Why is this rated better than Soul Reaver 2?
I was shocked by how many of the hardcore followers of the series rave on about Soul Reaver 1 after I finally played it. The story (the one we ended up with, not the one that was originally meant for the game) was extremely lacking. The gameplay was glitchy and had those dreadful box puzzles. The 'world' that was created, another praise I'm hearing....come on now, it was generic as could be. The complete void of a map and vague directions just made everything in the game seem a tedius chore, with no payoff at the end. I prefered Blood Omen so much to this it's not even funny.
And it doesn't even stand close to Soul Reaver 2. Yet it's pulling an 8.9 while SR2 gets an 8. Glancing at the GameFAQs.com reviews and gamerankings.com, the descrepency of SR1 being more highly regarded as 2 remains there as well.
Am I missing something? SR2 is one of the most satisfying games I've played in a long time, while I had to force myself to beat 1.