MovieChat Forums > Partition (2007) Discussion > Who would have been better cast?

Who would have been better cast?


Since the casting of Kristin Kreuk has sparked a lot of debate on this message board, I'm just wondering who else would have been better cast in the role of Naseem (Kreuk's character)?

A friend of mine suggested Jessica Alba and stated that she would have looked more 'Pakistani' than Kristin.

reply

Jessica alba is retarded for this kind of role...she is way too commercialized and haughty to play a humble indian girl

looks wise, yes she would worl

but mannerisms and aura..gotta give it to Kristin

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Hi Everyone,

I think for this movie for the role of Naseem they should have given a chance to an actress of South Asian descent (Indian or Pakistani) from the British television/movie à la Naveed Andrews or "Goodness Gracious me" or from India's movie industry (a lot of talent there especially in the art cinema) or casted an aspiring actress in UK, US or Canada.

I am a big fan of Kirsten Keurk, she is talented and beautiful but I feel only a South Asian can fully do justice to a role involving that period of subcontinent history. All Indian and Pakistani famillies have stories to tell of having to leave their ancestorial hometowns and what they experienced when they fled or left their homes behind.

Only a South Asian can portray the mannerisms, accent, the cultural difference (the importance of religion and rituals in South Asia) and relationships within family and outside family (The importance of the Urdu language in the cultural identity for the Indian Muslims, the concept of patriarchy, respect for elders, close families, the low emancipation of women in society etc...) and have an understanding of the complex relationship beteen Hindus and Muslims in India, why there are sometimes social ties and why at the sametime deep divisions. One should have an understanding of the feeling of helplessness as the events unfolded back then. I have heard many people express a certain nostalgia for life befoe 1947, maybe a wish that the clock could be turned back.

So a person of South Asian decent should have been given a chance to play the role not only because of the reasons I mentioned above but also because "there is" talent out there not only in our home countries but also in the diaspora of the South Asian community in UK, USA or Canada. People who are studying theatre and film who may have thought maybe I have a shot at least being type cast as Indian or Middle Eastern in Hollywood or Western Cinema and Televison.

If you want to do commericial cinema then fine get any actress that can bring in people to see the movie (taking into account the US and UK market). But dealing with the subject of Partition is a very sensitive topic, I feel its a part of history which belongs to South Asians and it was an event that was tragic. So even when you are potrying it in fiction yout need to put in a certain amount of realism and at the same time put in a certain amount of facts in prospective.

Take Care,

Bye,

Jawad (We have so much in common where are we fighting each other).

reply

[deleted]

The producers obviously wanted a box office "name" in one of the three main roles--no one outside the UK has heard of Jimi Mistry, and Neve Campbell has kinda fallen off the map in the past few years, mainly by choice, as she decided to concentrate on challenging indie-film roles rather than do "Scream VII." That leaves Kreuk, who clearly was cast only for the marquee value of her name--she can't act, and her ethnicity and appearance are totally wrong for the role.

So who would have been better? A lot of people have suggested known Bollywood stars, but that kind of misses the point; this film is being made for a North American mass-market audience, and, aside from _maybe_ Aishwarya Rai (who is surely too old for this part in any case) no Bollywood actresses are known enough in North America.

But there is one performer who does come to mind. Consider this:
1. She is a terrific actress with amazing and proven dramatic range.
2. She is reasonably well-known on both sides of the Atlantic, having starred in one of the biggest sleeper hits of the past few years and (currently) in one of the most popular TV shows in the world.
3. She is of authentic South Asian descent.
4. She looks considerably younger than her 30 years, and could surely pull off the role of Naseem.
5. She is even from one of the contries behind Partition, a British-Canadian co-production.

I refer, of course, to Parminder Nagra, star of Bend it Like Beckham and ER. This casting choice would have seemed like a no brainer to me. Whaddya think, guys?

PS: Is it just me, or does director Vic Sarin's filmography not make him exactly seem like one of the shining lights of the Canadian film industry? "Left Behind: The Movie", anyone? Kreuk or no, I have a LOT of trouble beliving Partition will be any good . . .

reply

haha jessica alba?? she would have a fit to even be cast as a pakistani more a muslim girl. i mean it seems dat jessica alba would only do roles dat potraty her as a caucasian chick ... check her board she seems to dislike her mexican heritage thingy.. aint sure ..

reply

Honestly i know how some of you might feel, like whem memoirs of a geisha came out, i was like Wtf is michelle yeoh doing in this movie, but besides that, we should look at the movie for the cinematography and good acting and good script, i mean you cant judge a boook by its cover right? maybe this is her breakthrough role i mean come on who would ever think reese witherspoon would have won an oscar i mean she DID legally blonde, i think she fits the aprt quite well i know some pakistani girls who have more caucasian features then people reckon, theres this whole stereoptype that they have to have dark hair and brown eyes, etc, i mean look at this picture

http://images.bestwebbuys.com/muze/books/65/0792269365.jpg


People i saw the commercial and its looks pretty friggin awesome

reply

99 % of the popultation has dark hair , brown skin and dark brown eyes only less than one percents have somewhat caucasian features. and all pakistanis should be proud of their own featues rather than being something they are not. similarly many italians have golden tan skin and are brunettes but they are many who are blond, they love to potray themselves as tall dark handsome , rather than blond fair...

reply

Pakistani people r ethnically white...

Pakistanis are Euro-Asians... or Indo-Aryan

Where as Indians are Indian

and people from Bangladesh, Sri Lanka are Afro-Indian...

I read a geneology study

reply