Unoriginal???? Storyline taken from a bolly wood movie

I find the storyline of this movie unoriginal mostly because it stole the relevant parts from actual events. Take a step back and remember that this was real. Whatever crappy movies show you, remember that they are sensationalizing serious events that shaped two countries. At best, we have one-sided accounts of what happened and at worst a third party stepping in to judge our history for us. Either way all I have to say to this is get bent.

I’m sick and tired of these films that exploit historical events just to push out some craptastic love story that wouldn’t hold up by itself. So if we can’t get this storyline to hold up itself, lets graft it onto a historical event, ignore the politics and history of the time but morons will watch it. Bet yet, morons will argue of the stupid piece of crap movie and get us free publicity.

If you don’t agree think about it for awhile, how many substandard movies have you watched where the main storyline isn’t worth a damn, but the historical connection is what got it attention. I’ll start the list:
- Mannat
- The English Patient
- Gadar
- Titanic
- Pearl Harbor (in anyone of its silly incarnations starting the line
with Ben Affleck)
- Udham Singh (random and sundry collection of movies that didn’t
bother at all with historical accuracy, too many to
start listing titles individually).
- The Patriot
- The Last Samurai

Bored now . . .