MovieChat Forums > Malcolm in the Middle (2000) Discussion > Lois really was a horrible mother many t...

Lois really was a horrible mother many times.


Humiliating Malcolm in front of the whole school by freaking out over a single stain on his pants, messing up his first year at college...
Lois Battles Jamie is an episode all point out to defend Lois's tacticts. She burned Francis's teddy bear in front of him so he would learn not to play with lighter fluid. What was the lighter fluid doing there on the floor anyway, being such an easy access to him? Not to mention that she had a terrible attitude towards Francis's wife despite disliking the way Hal's family had been treating her. She admitted to holding a grudge against him, which presumably spurred on the unhealthy relationship they had later. So, in order for her to be happy, her child had to be miserable? That is just incredibly selfish and just wrong, 
Hal is mostly passive most of the time but actually isn't much better than Lois. Episode Morp shows that well. Dude, you kicked out your thirteen year old son out of the house, at night, alone, with a free access to your money and credit cards, so you could have sex with your wife. What if some creep offered him a ride or he ran into some junkie wanting a fix etc.? From what I remember, they didn't exactly live in an upscale-or safe-neighborhood. 
Yes, she stood up for Reese when those girls humiliated him etc. but that is like a free ice cream in Hell if you get the comparisson. 

reply

It's a comedy. I think you're taking the show too seriously.

reply

And the boys were horrible, horrible sons.


Pobre de Dios que no sale en revistas, que no es modelo ni artista, o de familia real...

reply

Because of her.

reply

It's pointed out many times that it's due to having a house full of boys and she being the only girl. The testosterone flowing through that house is insane, and the only way she can remain in control is to be even more over the top than them. Hal used to be just like them until he met her, it's just in their blood. The episode with Francis as a baby shows it's not her but Hal's DNA. She was a saint to him and he was still a little hell raiser...


'Get yourself a real dog. Any dog under 50 lbs is a cat and cats are pointless' - Ron Swanson

reply

She wasn't a saint, that was closer to negligence. Kids that age don't understand dangers/rules and Francis was only making problems because he could-why was there a lighter fluid just there on the floor, easily in his reach, for example? You don't just let your children grow up in a jungle, basically, and then borderline abuse them when they do something wrong.

reply

I agree with that. That kind of stuff shouldn't be in the reach of little ones.

I've been rewatching the episodes and thinking it over. There are a lot of people on this board or other sites that say the boys were in fact in the wrong and Lois had to be severe because of how the boys acted, but it could be that the boys were acting out because of Lois taking it to extreme levels on disciplining them. If they're going to get in trouble for things they didn't do anyway, then might as well have some fun while they're at it. For example, in Red Dress, she put them through all of that when they really didn't do anything wrong. She didn't even consider the fact that it could have been Hal, she immediately assumed it was them. I understand why she's flipping out over them setting stuff on fire, as she doesn't want them to burn to death in a fire, but she didn't even know it was them and didn't consider the fact they could be innocent. So if she always just assumes that they are being bad and they get punished for things they didn't do, I'm not surprised they act out.

Just to clarify, I'm in the middle of this debate. On the one hand, yes, Lois at times does take it to extremes when she shouldn't. Like in Evacuation, she had no right to humiliate Malcolm the way she did just because he stayed to study at Stevie's. Then there are times when it's understandable why she's freaking out or upset. I just compare her to other guardians and decided she isn't as bad as she could be. She isn't like the mother in flowers in the attic and abusing her kids to that extreme but she also isn't like Aunt Petunia in Harry Potter that let's her son get away with everything. Letting the kids get away with everything has just as much damage because they are not learning right from wrong.

I agree, she could tone it down a bit as there are times she goes overboard in her 'teachings' when she humiliates them[mainly Malcolm] or freaks out more than the situation calls for, but it's also good she isn't just letting them get away with things they do wrong. She's involved in her kids lives and tries to raise the to what she thinks is right[most the time]. Cause there's another part about Lois that makes it seem like she's just sadistic rather than teaching her kids right from wrong-when she tells Malcolm to do something and he's wrong for doing that and then when he does what she wants -he gets punished for that too. That seems sadistic more than parenting.

There are also times when Lois shows how much she loves them and defends them or helps them when she doesn't need to. Where other parents would just shrug it off, she helps them in some way.


I'm a Timelord.
Right, not pompous at all then.

reply

To be fair, I think the point is that Francis was the type of kid who would have found and played with the lighter fluid no matter where they put it. Some kids are more rambunctious than others. I wasn't particularly unruly, and I had a pretty good childhood. I think it just so happens that when Hal and Lois mix their genes, their offspring produce typically more spirited children.

Interestingly enough, not all of the kids were like that. I think a lot of their behavior problems were the result of them growing up, doing what the others were doing and being influenced by each other, and playing off each other. For instance, Francis came out fighting, as did Reese. That was who they were from the start. Jamie was like that as well.

But if Malcolm and Dewey had been raised together without anyone else- or even just on their own, I think the house would have been significantly calmer.

Because the show is shot from Malcom's point of view- one of the "good" children, a lot of the punishments or lectures he has to endure because of what someone else did seems especially unfair. But I notice when it's just Lois and Malcolm, or just Lois and Dewey on screen, Lois seemed to be a bit nicer. Like the time Lois spent the episode playing cards and baking cookies for Dewey. Or the time Lois and Malcolm got sick and spent the day bedazzling stuff together. Or when Malcolm felt insecure about joining the Krelboyne class, and Lois said she would kick anyone's ass, including Malcolm's, if they ever said he was a bad person.

I think it was the little moments like that in between the chaos that showed she was a good mom who actually cared about her kids, and just wanted them to survive. I think anyone who has more than one child, probably has to go a little crazy sometimes just to keep themselves sane, if that makes sense.

Finally, I think it should be noted, that we actually get to see the woman who raised Lois. This is a woman most everyone could agree is 10 times worse. She literally stabs Francis in the knee once for provoking her. Can you appreciate what it must have been like to be raised by that level of instability? Yet, Lois never stabs anyone. We never see her lay a hand on any of her kids really. She yells, she lectures, she makes up creative punishments, she grounds... she's a big improvement over the parenting she endured. If any of her children have kids, they will also improve on her.

Little girls shouldn't look for four leaf clovers!

reply

Yeah she could be a bitch at times, but so could they. The point of the show is that this family isn't perfect and many times the lines are blurred and the parents are acting like adults and at times the out of control children can teach the adults things. They aren't perfect parents, but like it was pointed out in the first season, you at least knew where you stood in the family. They didn't pretend to trust you and appreciate you and then you find out it was all a lie. They can be obnoxious at times and take things too far, but they also stick together and get through things together and can be their kookiest selves around each other. There are times they stab each other in the back and there are times they have each others back.

The parents aren't always perfect, but they do love their kids and try to raise them right.



I'm a Timelord.
Right, not pompous at all then.

reply

I agree. But if you go look at The Middle board you read how Frankie is one of the worst tv moms according to some users.

I actually feel Lois was worse. She clearly had anger problems and almost joyfully took them out on her kids.

But all in all it is a tv show and comedy. Lois is based off the creators mother. He played Adam on Little House On The Prairie.

reply

I always thought Lois was a great parent. She was tough as nails but she had to be considering how bad her kids were.

reply

They were bad because of her.

reply

I use to hate her as a when I watched this show as a teen.

However, she herself grew up with a horrible mother. She probably doesn't know how to be a loving parent.

This sounds bad but I don't think she intentionally wanted kids! She just couldn't keep her legs closed lol

reply

The worst is probably the way she treated Piama. And who was she to criticize the way Francis lived his life by that point? I seem to remember him emancipating himself.

reply