MovieChat Forums > The Cell (2000) Discussion > So basically Lopez character was pointle...

So basically Lopez character was pointless?


I must have missed something. Because it sure seemed that after all of that futzing around in his psyche, the break in the case, Vaughn remembering the symbol from the house and tracking it down is just good old fashioned police work. Or at BEST the result of Vaughn going into his brain, not her.

She basically contributed nothing in the end except that if she hadn't been stupid enough to be caught, Vinces character wouldn't have gone in after her and MAYBE therefore wouldn't have had his epiphany about the symbol.

reply

Yeah, pretty much.

That, and to mention how Carl thinks himself a god in his own mind, and then dresses herself as the Virgin Mary.

reply

"She basically contributed nothing in the end except that if she hadn't been stupid enough to be caught, Vinces character wouldn't have gone in after her and MAYBE therefore wouldn't have had his epiphany about the symbol."

So she clearly wasn't useless, was she? it isnt a maybe. Had he not gone back to get her he wouldnt of seen the symbol


Ruin is a gift. Ruin is the road to transformation (Eat, Pray, Love)

reply

Or MAYBE, the film was about more than just finding the serial killer's victim. Just maybe.

reply

No the movie was about showing us how pointless it can be.

reply

She fulfills the role of the Ultimate Woman (in the eyes of men of course). The female who had the capacity to both love and destroy Stargher, which is what he most secretly and truely desired. She also has a madonna/whore thing going on. She finds the little boy and provides a maternal caring for him that he never knew. To love someone you have to make yourself completely vulnerable, especially the kind of love a mother has for her child, which is how he is able to trap her and have her under his control through a mind meld or mind enslavement or whatever was going on. Vaughn's character is only able to save her through the remembered emotional pain of losing a younger sibling (she has her own issues going on). Near the end of the movie she becomes some sort of quasi-religious woman warrior symbol of justice to kill him.

The thing I'd like to know is what happened after she is 'lost' in his head and why she doesn't seem to suffer any mental or emotional consequences from this? Because she's a trained psychologist? It's also interesting to me that the only time her character is sexual is when she is 'lost' in Stargher's head. Otherwise she's mainly a compassionate social worker, a loving motherly figure, or a religious warrior.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

What this criticism misses is that in the beginning, she was the one who actually penetrated the killer's head. She initiated the process.

reply

the serial killer grew up motherless, JLO's character filled that void




so many movies, so little time

reply