MovieChat Forums > The Wedding Planner (2001) Discussion > Wedding Etiquette Question (OT)

Wedding Etiquette Question (OT)


I don't know if anyone out there can help me, but I recently received a wedding invitation with a separate card that indicated driving directions, plus a website listing that included more details, photos of bride and groom, etc.

The website, but not the invitation, indicated a reception at a local country club following the ceremony. The website also indicated to return response cards by a certain date.

I received no response card, nor did a friend of mine who received the same invitation.

Are we to assume that we are invited to the wedding ceremony (held at a church) but not the reception afterwards? If so, is this not terrible etiquette?

I can't find any source on the web that addresses this at all. Is it common practice these days to invite someone to a wedding (ostensibly with the expectation of a wedding gift) but not to the reception?

I know this is off-topic, but I thought I'd give it a shot.

Lord, beer me strength!

reply

I got invited to a wedding reception once but not the actual wedding since the wedding consisted of just the family. I don't know if I've ever heard of being invited to the wedding but not the reception....if I were in your position, I would assume that I was not invited to the reception just for the sake of not embarrassing myself by showing up at something that I wasn't invited to. However, I wonder if there is someone you know who is close to the bride or groom that you could very discreetly ask whether or not you're invited. I do think it's kind of weird for you that you've sort of been put in a position to find out that you're invited to one thing and not the other, unless there was some sort of mix-up somewhere - you know that a stack of invitations went out without response cards....

reply

It is common practice to be invited to the wedding but not the reception to keep costs of the reception down. I wouldn't be offended if i were you, i've heard of this happening loads of times.

reply

Stargirl - I'm glad to hear your explanation! I know that I always feel a lot better when someone takes a minute or two to put things in to perspective for me...

reply

Really old thread, but as I just watched the movie, I'm looking now.

This may be common where you are, but considered extremely bad etiquette to invite people to a ceremony and not to the reception. There are exceptions, of course, such as inviting the entire congregation to the ceremony and keeping the reception private. But to simply not invite a wedding guest to the reception to save costs is rude. It implies you invited them for the sole purpose of squeezing a gift out of them, as they aren't important enough to be at the reception.

You can easily save costs by skipping non-essential things like centerpieces, chair covers, going for a less expensive chair, cutting out a few hors d'oeuvres, hosting beer and wine only rather than open bar, having your wedding on a Friday instead of Saturday, a less expensive dress, Etc.

reply

Nonsense! One may have plenty of friends from school, but wishes to keep the reception small. Still one thinks his old companions would like to know he/she´s getting married, so sends them invitation to the ceremony. It´s quite common. I personaly don´t wish to spend long hours on a boring reception of people I like only mildly - still I can attend the ceremony and wish them well.

reply

Etiquette is simply a set of social rules that you can choose to follow or not.

You don't have to invite everyone you ever met. Send them an announcement after the fact. Unless you are having your entire congregation to your ceremony, you should extend the invitation to the reception to all guests. Not inviting them to both indicates that those guests aren't that important to the bride and groom.

There are ways to do what the OP is asking without it being against etiquette. But to do it just to save costs? What about the costs incurred by the guest?

Why not adjust the budget? Is it more important to have elaborate centerpieces, a $3k dress, a super fancy cake, slipcovers for the chairs, etc. over inviting more people to the reception?

Again, you can have your opinion, but that doesn't change the fact that it's against proper social etiquette.

reply

It may not be a question of a budget. I simply like small, intimate weddings with really good friends and soulmates, and hate those big noisy parties with +100 relative strangers, who just disrupt a very special, personal day.

reply

I am with you on that. My wedding had sixty guests. I would have gone smaller, but those were the must haves.

reply

[deleted]

If you're invited to the Wedding at church it's assumed you will be at the reception. No question about it.

reply