Jane and the return to Thornfield
This subject has been sparked by a discussion on the 2006 board about Rochester's morality. I wonder what people on here think about it?
An aspect of the book that I have often wondered about is what did Jane expect to do when she fled St John and returned to Thornfield? She dropped everything when she heard Rochester's supernatural call and hurried back to find him. She didn't know about the fire and that he was, in fact, a free man. She talks of just seeing him but admits that she might then run to him " and if I did - what then?"
Would she have then surrendered the principles that made her run from him in the first place?
By the way, although I have been reading lots of posts on the 2006 board - which is very active - I'd better just state that this (1973) is still the version I love best - complete with its dated production values! I know that just now, with the release of the 2006 DVD, everyone seems to be raving about Toby Stephens but whilst he is a good Rochester, and suits many people - he will never be MY Rochester: that accolade belongs only to Jayston!