MovieChat Forums > Children of Men (2007) Discussion > What is so great about this movie?

What is so great about this movie?


Every post I see raving about it talks about how profound it is, it's such a masterpiece, etc.

What am I missing?

reply

Besides no shot wasted, every moment loaded with meaning, first class world building, amazing long shots, and basically doing everything the right way. It is the subtlety of it. It never turns into an over the top dystopia. It is a subtle bleakness that makes it so engaging and believable.

My favorite all time move is Lord of the Rings. The best movie I've ever seen is Children of Men.

reply

I'd only add its ability to show the darkness in humanity while highlighting the beauty and hope of our struggle to make it through our own eclipse.

But, yeah: you nailed it: it's just great art.

reply

You mean long takes

reply

Nothing. I think people like it because it is pro-(illegal/irregular)migrant propaganda and it was kind of ahead of its time in pushing that agenda. The 'good guys' are lefties, the bad guys are 'nazis', that's really the intellectual depth of the film. There's not much else to say about it.

reply

Zilch. The storyline is so ridiculous as well as the whole script. The only redeeming value is it has some good actors and tries to create a dystopian world with dark lighting, etc. I mean when Clive Owen said, "I've got to take the day off because I feel so bad about the death of the 18-year-old superstar" (who is only a superstar because of his age), I knew what to expect for the rest of the film and its mediocrity did not disappoint. Once the great Michael Caine had to stoop to lines like, "look at my finger" it lost me for good.

reply

That line to his boss was character building. We already know how apathetic Theo is towards the crisis in the opening scene (which was brilliant exposition). This shows how far his apathy goes. He's will to lie about his feelings of what seems to be the end of civilization, just to get out of work for the day.

reply

It's the end of civilization because some 18 year old snot died?

reply

No, because humans have gone infertile. There haven’t been any babies born for almost two decades.

reply

This is what I understood as well. Theo actually didn't care at all about the death of "Baby Diego". He lied just to have a day off. He was totally unmoved, elbowing through the crowd watching the news at the coffee shop.

reply

Exactly. That is where his character arch starts and ends in a much different place.

reply

You pretty much answered your own question when you gave your two cents on The Lighthouse. You're just not an art guy.

reply

You're right on that. I was expecting it with The Lighthouse, though.

reply

I saw it in theaters and was blown away at the time. The 8 minute single take action sequences, the familiar dystopian society that resembled certain post-9/11 world, everything on screen appeared fresh and relevant. It even seemed prescient a few years later with the refugee crisis and Brexit.
But on closer inspection the movie is a little under and conveniently written for the main characters to get out of insane situations relatively unharmed, or unanswered logical question - eg how or why the Army just let the only child anyone had seen in decades walk away from a war zone at the end.

I agree that the idea of imminent human extinction in such a banal manner is existentially depressing and incredibly interesting to see people react to, but it feels like the world isn’t explored enough by the filmmakers. I used to rate it quite highly, but these days I would lower it down to the 7 or even 6 range as okay to pretty good. By comparison, I would probably rate Cuarón’s last movie, Y Tu Mamá También, a lot higher.

reply