MovieChat Forums > If These Walls Could Talk 2 (2000) Discussion > Why no 'if these walls could talk' 3 and...

Why no 'if these walls could talk' 3 and 4?


The 2 "if these walls could talk" movies dealt with social issues in different eras, mainly abortion and lesbianism. Well how about RACISM. One family could be blacks in the south during Jim Crow another could be Jews experiencing antisemitism and the 3rd could be hispanics being harrassed and maybe the fourth could be middleeastern emigrants after the terrorist attacks.

Then you could do the flipside of the 2nd movie and have a movie about gay MALE couples?

reply

[deleted]

How about a movie version of the classic children's book series ROLL OF THUNDER HEAR MY CRY about a family of black people struggling to get by in the South during the era of Jim Crow?

IF THESE WALLS COULD TALK was a GREAT idea for a series of movies that were anthologies dealing with different societal issues and CONTROVERSIAL ones to boot, yet it just stopped at number 2, what a shame.

reply

[deleted]

Let's be a bit more true to the original formula than that. Parts 1 and 2 were all about issues that plagued women! So for part 3, it should be about how a group of women found the strength within said 'Walls' to deal with the source of their problems - MEN.

After plotting their revenge, they all went out into the world, became dominatrixes and feminists, and ruined the lives of one man after another as only they can.

Or how about we just leave it the way it was. The first one was decent, the second, not so much. No need for a third, much less a forth.

Cheers!



Give me an inch, and I'll make the best of it

reply

the films are supposed to be about women's experiences and lives. having gay men means it's not about women

reply