Yeah, the plot is thin, the acting is not of Shakespearean quality. If you like low budget comedies, this one is good. The women are pleasing to the eye, some of the jokes are funny, and the music is fantastic. Hey, you can also waste your time watching one of those movies that gets all the hype and costs a billion dollars to make!
shareHow's Michael (Bublé) in it? Is he good?
Don't talk to the driver while he's drinking.
-Hawkeye Pierce-
Yeah, it was not too bad. For the $1 I payed for it (DVD) I didn't feel riped off. It was good quality! Clear picture quality! That was one reason I enjoyed it. Yes, the acting and writing was "thin" and begginer. But it was not too bad. 6/10.
shareI not only liked it, I was ROTFL! Sometimes it is OKAY, folks, to just accept a low-budget comedy for what it is and not expect anything more. Not every movie made has to be Gandhi, for God's sake. For my money, it was more consistently funny than anything I have seen on Saturday Night Live for at least 20 years. Silly, yes, and overdone and all that, but I found it totally delightful. And I am not some young hound - I am an official female Old Fart. But I still have my sense of humor, and this tickled it big-time.
And Michael Bublé? Shut up! Those adorable puppydog eyes? That wonderful, rich, mature voice? He was way cute. Definitely the Sinatra of the Millennium. In case you've forgotten, not all of Old Blue Eyes' movies were Oscar quality, either, but always worth watching to see him act and/or hear him sing. Maybe Bublé has a future in movies.......I had no idea he had made this one, but I thoroughly enjoyed it. At least 6 out of 10 for the bellylaughs. Totally great soundtrack, too.
I agree with you. You are wise.
share