MovieChat Forums > Scum (1991) Discussion > Why were two versions made?

Why were two versions made?


Anybody know the reason for the two versions - if it was the violence surely they would have edited the original. Was it due to the film quality?

reply

The original version was commisioned by the BBC as a TV Movie, hence they owned the rights to it. Just before it was due to be aired it was pulled by "The Establishment" as it was seen to be a bit to "Documentry" like. After two years were up Alan Clarke was free to use the story and make the theatrical version.

reply

And in the BBC TV version, there was a lot more made of the sexual relationship between some of the boys.

The 1979 version was billed as "the film they didn't want you to see", but of course it was a remake, eventually shown on Channel Four shortly after it began broadcasting.

The 1977 TV play version didn't make it to air for fifteen years.

reply

So which one is the best to see?

reply

[deleted]

Is the 1979 version the one where Carlin has his bitch, a pretty boy in his cell? I can't remember what his name was.

I've seen both versions and I can't remember which one it was in but one of them had this storyline entirely cut out.

reply

Hey, answer my nerd question: which version has better visuals? (shot composition, film stock, lalala)

reply

[deleted]

yeah, in the 79 version Carlin has a 'missis'. there was a scene where he explains to the lad what he wants from him etc.

reply

Does anybody know which release is the best one to get; the UK 2-disc tin edition, or the Blue Underground 2-disc edition? Can't seem to find which one is the better, and I really want to see the version I've not yet seen. any help appreciated. thanks

reply

It was in the 1977 TV version that he had the bitch. Carlin was not gay in the theatrical one.

reply

The 1977 BBC TV version. It seems more realistic, the 79 film added some extra unnecessary stuff, like the extra suicide (laughable) and extended rape scene (urgh...why?). Some of the scenes just didn't have the same feel to them. Maybe it's because I watched the 77 drama followed by the 79 film, but I much prefer the 77 TV drama, it's shorter but it's more concise and the flow is quicker. I also think the violence is more extreme in the 77 drama than it was in the 79 film and thought they made two versions because the TV drama was too realistic, so they added things to the 79 one to make it less believable.

The BBC drama had much more impact on me then the later film had and I will always show the 1977 production to people who haven't seen it rather than the 1979 feature film.

reply

I have a feeling the extra suicide scene was in the BBC version but might had been edited out. Having seen both versions, the film version is more cinematic in a low budget way whilst the BBC version is obviously a tv play but has David Threlfall.


Its that man again!!

reply

I've seen both versions on the Blue Underground discs. That's craftsmanship. Criterion quality.

The missus was in the BBC version. Carlin, with some difficulty, discuses it with the boy he picks. "I ain't a *beep* puffter," he says. And so they make their arrangement. One of the men involved with the two versions of the film was unhappy to have lost the subplot because it gave Carlin a vulnerability.

By the way, it's hard to confuse the two versions. The BBC version was shot on grainy 16mm film. The theatrical version stepped up to colorful, vibrant 35mm. Each medium has its advantages. And each version of the film has its advantages. I give the theatrical version the edge, but neither film should be neglected.

reply

I think the BBC version is my favorite, because I love David Threlfall's Archer...and I like Phil Daniel's adorable puffy hair :P.

-Amanda

"She will remember your heart when men are fairy tales in storybooks written by rabbits"

reply

I definitely prefer the 1977 BBC version. There was really no point in having a remake.

reply

There was really no point in having a remake.


There was a point, and it has already been brought up.

The BBC owned the rights to the original TV version. The BBC banned it from being shown.
So the film version was made and released instead.
If there was no point in having a re-make...most people would never had seen Scum.

God didn't create man, man created God

reply

The Wide Boy was written by my brother Mike Khan (Please note that credits mispelt the name).

The Amazing Mike Khan Band (later changing their name to The "Khan Band") performed around the world for many years.

Due to a very bad contract with EMI in the early days the band sold their own tapes, disc's and later CD's at gigs.

Roy, who wrote "Scum" and Alan who directed both tv and the film were very good friends of Mike and admired Mike's music, So it was with no surprise that Mike was asked to write the score for the TV play.

I have read replies to questions on the TV Play and must put this matter to rights.

The BBC and political climate at the time saw fit to ban the showing under the guise that it was not a realistic view of borstal life.

As soon as Alan and Roy were free to remake "Scum" as a film they battled to have Mike's music released from the BBC, but to no avail. Otherwise Mike's music would have been included in the film version.

Mike died in 2008 leaving behind over 300 complete songs and many more songs he didn't feel happy enough to call finished.

If you enjoyed "Wide Boy" then you will certainly enjoy other songs written and performed by Mike.

"Amsterdam", "Bastards", "Joey", and "Dancing with the moonshine boy's" to name but a few.

reply

[deleted]