MovieChat Forums > The Last Man on Planet Earth (1999) Discussion > Would it?

Would it?

posted 14 years ago by River-K
2 replies | jump to latest

I have seen this movie years ago, and I thought it was ok. ( Funny fact, I became a big Paul Francis fan after seeing him in Tears of the Sun, Paul playes Adam in Last Man ) The reviews are mixed, some people like it, some don't. That's ok, we can't all like the same movies. But I can't help wondering, would it have been better if they would've done somethings different? Like different cast ( I really likes Paul in this role, I thought he did a good job considering it was his first 'big role' ) Better crew? Better location? Better set?

Your thoughts??

[–] thadcastle 13 years ago

Half your questions answer themselves. Would it be a better movie if there were 'better' crew, location and set... I don't know how you measured how much better this location was but by saying it was better in the first place would lead to the assumption that it would improve the movie.

Of course the movie would have been better if some things were done differently due mainly to nothing being perfect, just do the imperfect bits perfectly and there you go, a difference that betters the movie.

Sorry for being such a d-ck about this its half 1 in the morning and in a weird kinda of calm rage I'm stumbling around forums, finding unanswered questions and finding in my fatigue I have no effort or patience to answer anything constructively.

[–] River-K 13 years ago

Haha it's ok. I was in the same state when I started this topic, or sort of. And you're right, I answered my own questions. Thanks for your answer and opinion.