MovieChat Forums > Vertical Limit (2000) Discussion > What do you mountaineers think?

What do you mountaineers think?


I wanna know what real climbers think about this film. I've been watching everest documentaries and read survival stories etc. and re-watching this film made me cringe. The whole idea of it is complete nonsense. People continually die on these mountains and there are great stories everywhere, this could have been something great. I mean it's not easy to film actors climbing mountains, it must be pretty difficult but why did they have to add to it with nitro glycerine
backpacks and mountain side helicopter rides etc.? Scott Glenn climbing a mountain all by himself would be good enough for me. lol


Ronpaulfestival.org Tampa, FL August 24-26, Happy 77 Ron!

reply

The director clearly wanted to make an entertaining popcorn thriller. THe nitroglycerine adds the suspense. If you don't like Hollywood popcorn thrillers, then by all means watch the documentaries on climbing, but judge this according to what it sets out to be. It sets out to be a popcorn movie and it is successful in that. What "real climbers" think is kind of irrelevant - the movie is not targeted towards them, it's targeted towards the movie-going public at large.

reply

I'm just asking them because this film makes climbers look a bit ridiculous and I'd love to maybe hear a good story or two.

Ronpaulfestival.org Tampa, FL August 24-26, Happy 77 Ron!

reply

Oh, God, where to start. It isn't Rainer, or even Everest. It is an extremely remote location with limited access; just reaching K2 takes about a week, on foot, packing all your gear. People do not helicopter in, unless it's the military, airlifting an injured climber. The base camp alone is at over 16,000 FT; the trek in is part of a climber's acclimation process. So the scene of the BC party, with multiple wood fires for ambiance, is silly. There are no trees, no wood anywhere nearby. (Maybe the billionaire could afford to have packers trek it in, or got the military to fly in a helicopter full of firewood.) Speaking of helicopters, maybe a stripped-down Llama equipped for high altitude might get to a climber on a mountain, but, an injured climber can wait for some time before even getting a ride out of base camp there. The reality just goes downhill from the opening scenes. Almost everyone behaves like idiots; climbing K2 is exciting and dangerous enough without having multiple climbers packing nitro for whatever ridiculous reason (perhaps they need more avalanches), and, and, and. I liked Scott Glen's character, but when he and Chris find Scott's frozen enamorata, he says they're at the vertical limit, yet they are walking around and breathing as if at sea level. Emphasis on level - the architecture of K2 at that altitude is very steep- unless they've found a snow cave inside the frightening Balcony serac. I'm sure others will have much more relevant criticisms than my poor observations. The mountain scenery is nice, though.

reply

I'm not a mountaineer but I do know several people who have driven them. This movie seems fake. There was no mention of cannibalism. Not a hint. Also where are all the Yeti? There were not even yeti foot print although that could be explained by frequent avalanches. Perhaps they were scared away or even injured by the constant avalanches. They may have been scared by the exploding boot.

These avalanches, which the movie disparately attempted to down play were caused by Global Warming. Al Gore had warned of this. The good news was with the rising sea level the Vertical Limit was several thousand feet higher and Scott Glenn did not need his pressure suit from the Right Stuff.

Most real mountaineers are not as smart or as safety conscience as the people in this film. Few of them have the foresight to carry nitroglycerin which can be very useful on a mountainside.

Besides downplaying all the avalanches and cannibalism, this film tried to make mountain climbing appear much safer than it really is. Notice that several mountaineers survived the film. This may have been for a sequel

reply

These actors look about as much like they're on a 28,000ft mountain as they are on the sun deck of the Beverly Hills Hotel. The girls especially. Boy, their eyeliner sure looks perfect for girls that haven't even had a bath in a month. And the parties at base camp? Are you kidding me? This is pure baloney as far as the realities of mountaineering are concerned. lol!

reply

They couldn't even get the matte painting right at the beginning. In 2000 for Gods sake. They barely tried to get the mountains insane scope and topography correct. No one was acclimatized at any point, meaning that all would've suffered extreme altitude sickness. The three lead climbers and the rescue party would never have been transported at any time via helicopter.
If they were on the Shoulder and making their way to the summit when the decision to turn around was finally made, there would have been no possibility of a super crevasse cave where they could hold out like they did. Oh my God I could just go on and on with this one. Rifftrax needs to chew this one a new *beep*

reply