MovieChat Forums > Vatel (2000) Discussion > Vatel's choice of method to end his life

Vatel's choice of method to end his life


Since Vatel's suicide was based on acutal events (indeed, it took 3 thrusts to complete his seppeku) I'm perplexed as to why he would choose such a painful and difficult method to achieve his moribund objective. It would have been common knowledge as to how skilled the Italians were at poisoning, particularly in the political arena. Not only were the ancient Romans adept at the art of poisoning, but the misadventures of the Renaissance Medicis abound with plots involving poison, but it must be said that Lucrezia Borgia created a mythical stereotype that overshadowed all the rest.
Vatel's daily life was filled meeting with purveyors of all the most esoteric and variegated foodstuffs, including herbs, roots, spices, medecines, odd alcoholic beverages, etc, etc, etc. I wonder why he didn't give more time in selecting a method of dispatching himself with far less pain and mess. It's a pity that monsters such as Goering, Himmler, Joseph Goebbels and Uncle Adolph were able to bite into a pill and die peacefully and quickly, offering them a death Vatel wasn't lucky enough to endure instead of the painful and ritual suicide he chose to execute upon himself.
The Japanese ritual of Hari-kiri were not known to the Europeans in the Golden Age of the 17th Century, so any proposal that Vatel was inspired by the Nipponese would be faulty. At any rate, I think Vincent and Theo would agree, if the fish were late, well than, that's that. The stomach was Vincent's target too out in the wheatfield, but I think I'd rather shoot myself with a small caliber old handgun than rip my stomache open with a sword, particularly had I been a chef, one who's life pleasure rested in eating exquisite meals. I hear Gerard in real lfe is a hopeless epicurean since he enjoys eating as much as Orson Wells, another corpulent actor and director who cared little for weight watching.

reply

Vatel chose a sword for various reasons.

1.First,only noblemen could have swords in the ancien regime and Vatel had been ennobled earlier so the sword was a sign of his relatively elevated status(remember he could have just used a knife). Vatel was promoted earlier to the minor nobility and granted the right to carry a sword. This order of the nobility was very low ranking and included those who were promoted for service--like the finance minister Colbert in the movie(note that he, too, is dressed in an expensive but plain black suit like Vatel) and they were of similar status; they were not born nobles but were made more elevated than mere peasants. Hence, sometimes Vatel wears a wig which is also a sign of nobility and wears black suits. This is also why Gorville states that Vatel "will eventually end up a Viscount"--that is the natural trajectory for those serving the Royal family in this way as they kept on being promoted as they aged. This is what happened to Gourville after the death of Vatel(see my long post on this board under Historical Accuracy Spoilers thread where I tell what happened to all the main characters in VATEL)as he eventually became a courtier and was hosting marquises and duchesses later in life. The real Vatel was concerned with his honor and the sword was a sign of his status--he was no ordinary cook but one who served only the highest nobility and royalty(his boss,Conde, was the first Prince of the Blood royal and was a cousin of the king).

In reality, the real life Vatel killed himself because he felt he had failed the king and his employer Prince Conde because he thought the fish did not arrive on time--and that the banquet would be ruined. The real Vatel probably would have loved to go to Versailles and take over from Louis XIV's famed chef Careme. In the movie, however, they tried to elevate Vatel's motives and bring social commentary about the class system into it instead of depicting what was a severe tempremental/depressive chef freakout exaceberated by sleep deprivation. If one reads the memoirs and letters about the incident, Vatel was very concerned with his status and was afraid he could not survive with his honor intact if his meals did not come off perfectly as he would be humilated as a great chef. He is also depicted as having gone without sleep or rest for days in all the accounts of the incidents including Madame Sevigne's and there is note of some previous glitches during the royal stay at Chantilly(mainly because as the movie noted, "they gave the wrong numbers!" of guests).

2.Roman generals, etc, were said to "fall on their swords" when they committed suicide to preserve their honor--they literally fell on their swords and so determined their own deaths before their enemies could. Vatel was going out the same way. Women were said to use poison--ie like Cleopatra. In general, women have more often been linked to death by poison as it is a more nonviolent method. Many historical female figures like Catherine de Medici, Lucrezia Borgia,etc, were linked with poisoning. Even today, men are more often noted to use violent means to kill themselves or others while women are more often associated with things like drug overdoses to commit suicide or in rare female murder cases, to poisoning others.

reply

Wow. Thanks, again for your illuminating and ever-so-interesting responses. I bow to your erudition. Seriously. Thank you so much.

reply