MovieChat Forums > Kadosh (1999) Discussion > 'Kadosh' and 'Ha Ushpizin'

'Kadosh' and 'Ha Ushpizin'


I somehow failed for a few years to see this film, although it has been quite successful and generated a lot of discussions in Israel. I am sorry that I did not postpone indefinitely seeing it.

The theme of 'Kadosh' is a very real and painful one for those who know the Jewish religious world - the place of women in the orthodox family and society. The basic situation that sits at the premises of the film is possible, the problem is that the way it is brought to screen and the 'solution' that the conflicts described receives in the movie is wrong. Gitai does not seem to have too much sympathy for men in the religious world, but his approach of picking characters that are either fanatic, or unable to express their human feeling makes the whole story seem simplistic. Neither does he a much better service to his women characters, although here at least he shows more sympathy and he also enjoys the participation of two beautiful and gifted actresses. Overall Gitai's vision is too one-sided, his cinema means are too basic, he focuses on the technical details of the Jewish religious life, which may be interesting for people who do not know them but are really not relevant at all in the context of the whole story. Starting from interesting premises what we get here is a boring film which seems longer than it is, with a very static way of acting, obsessive use of music that plays in the same register not only from a musical but also from an emotional perspective and a very inconclusive if not even confusing ending. What difference between this film and 'Ha Ushpizin' inspired from and describing the very same social landscape and which succeeded to transmit human feelings on the screen. The later also seemed to be much more authentic in the description of the religious aspects of the Jewish life, and this without going in that many details as 'Kadosh'. In 'Kadosh' there are both too little cinema and too little human emotions.

reply

I felt Kadosh was 100% more realistic and authentic, and 100% more serious and emotionally poignant than Ha Ushpizin.

The latter was melodramatic and comedic and simplistic compared to the mesmerizing Kadosh.

(I rated both films highly, though, don't mistake my trivialization of the Ushpizin for a dislike of the film - both films represent antipodal themes, and both films depict those themes in a starkly contrasting manner.)

Kadosh was swellingly pregnant with emotions, but the emotions were forcibly constricted (good G-d, the wife diesfrom her emotions...), which paralleled the religious theology and lifestyle of the characters, and the psyche of the religious Jewish mindset and worldview. Kadosh also embodied, and transcended, social and religious and political landscapes (just like Gitai's Free Zone) that were never addressed, directly or metaphorically, in Ushpizin.

Kadosh is designed to paint an extremely destructive portrait of not just ultra-Orthodox (generic label) Jewry, but the sum total of the [religious] Jewish mindset and overall worldview, and perhaps even presence.

Ushpizin is designed to paint a positive portrait of ultra-Orthodox Jewry, offering them much-needed support in a world where most people, including Jews, lean towards Gitai's heavily critical mindset.

I watched Ushpizin maybe two years ago, and my feelings went from pure joy to indifference. I watched Kadosh about a year ago, and my feelings continuously raven up and calcinate within me, and surge outward, wishing to, I'm ultimately not willing to say what I want to say.

One film speaks a truth that nobody should fear and the other film is a mask that does not need to be worn.

reply