MovieChat Forums > Cut (2000) Discussion > I thought it was good.

I thought it was good.


Though I have to admit it was B - Grade.

The concept of how the killer existed because of the old footage of the orignal scenes from the unfinished movie and how they decided to get rid of it by destroying the film was clever.

The speical were pretty good for movie of this type. Seeing the creature melt while the film was beeing burnt looked particuly effective.

This is very good for a Australian film.

reply

i must say i agree. this movie was much better than wolf creek too, which was also an australian film. there were some slow parts but i think other than that it was pretty good. very impressive

reply

I agree. This movie was very good, I bought a used VHS copy from BlockBuster yesterday. I like that B-movie grade of film style. Nice plot.


San Diego Ca, Indie Filmmaker

reply

Although I did enjoy this film a considerable amount, I don't think it even came close to Wolf Creek. But this movie does kick some ass.

"Hail to the king baby."

My Movies http://us.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=15840103

reply

i loved it was really good one of the best australian horror flicks i have ever seen kicks the *beep* outta wolfcreek that movie was lame same as the undead

reply

No way. Wold Creek was wayyyyy better (my opinion of course). This movie wasn't too bad (it served its purpose of giving me the chills) but the ending really sucked. So lame.

reply

[deleted]

Just watched it for the very first time ever on FEARNET Free On-Demand ( and on all this month ) . A most amusing film indeed lol but I definitely viewed it out of curiosity too and because one of my favorite actresses Molly Ringwald was in it . However I agree with mikepth the storyline concept of this film was clever . Thanks mikepth for your subject post .

reply