This movie cost more than Return Of The King.
While this movie is not as terrible as everyone might have you think, it's still prety dull. But what's more laughable is that it cost more to
make than "Return Of The King".
Pathetic.
Ever seen the ol mel brooks movie "the producers", where do you think all that money went.....
shareYes, they intentionally made this movie a flop to launder money. The 100 million it cost probably came from shady russian mobsters or drug money or some other dubious source, and might have cleaned the money by spending it on actors salaries, production studios, digital effects companies, etc. There's no other explanation for it, no one intentionally goes out to lose 95 million dollars, not in these days of high-powered marketing executives and corporate financial gurus with their excel spreadsheets, out to protect the investors. It's just impossible that this movie should be such a spectacular flop.
share