MovieChat Forums > Cleopatra (1999) Discussion > Cleopatra wasn't black.

Cleopatra wasn't black.


She was Macedonian Greek. The Ptolemies customarily married their siblings, so she wasn't mixed with much of anything.

reply

[deleted]

Cleopatra was of Greek blood and descent, I have no idea how she would come to be the last Queen of Egypt instead of Greece (if they had royalty, I think).

From Yahoo Encyclopedia:

Cleopatra


(klēpă´tr, —pā´—, —p䴗) , 69 —30 , queen of Egypt, one of the great romantic heroines of all time. Her name was widely used in the Ptolemaic family; there were many earlier Cleopatras. The daughter of Ptolemy XI, she was married at the age of 17 (as was the family custom) to her younger brother Ptolemy XII. The force and character of the royal pair was, however, concentrated in the alluring (though apparently not beautiful) and ambitious queen. She led a revolt against her brother, and, obtaining the aid of Julius Caesar, she won the kingdom, although it remained a vassal of Rome. Her young brother-husband was accidentally drowned in the Nile. She then married her still younger brother Ptolemy XIII, but she was the mistress of Caesar and followed him to Rome; there she bore a son, Caesarion (later Ptolemy XIV), who was said to be his. Returning to Egypt after the murder of Caesar and the battle of Philippi, she was visited (42 ) by Marc Antony, who had come to demand an account of her actions. He fell hopelessly in love with her, and Cleopatra, conscious of her royalty and even her claims to divinity as the pharaoh's daughter, seems to have hoped to use Antony to reestablish the real power of the Egyptian throne. They were married in 36 Most of the Romans feared and hated Cleopatra, and Octavian (later Augustus) undertook to destroy the two lovers. Antony and Cleopatra were defeated off Actium in 31 , and, returning to Alexandria, they tried to defend themselves in Egypt. When they failed, Antony committed suicide by falling on his sword. Cleopatra, faced by the cold and unmoved Octavian, also killed herself. Her schemes failed, but her ambition, capability, and remarkable charm have left a great impression on history. Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra, based on Plutarch, describes the tragic end of the queen's career, and Dryden's All for Love: or, The World Well Lost is a reworking of Shakespeare. Caesar and Cleopatra, the comedy by G. B. Shaw, deals with the early years of her story.



ANIMAL LOVERS UNITE

reply

Tom, actually some people want to believe that she was. Over the years I've heard a number of black Americans insist that Cleopatra and all the rest of them were black.

reply

Actually, people in Egypt are Mid-Eastern. But it is true that Cleopatra was of Macedonian-Greek descent.

Did you know that Cleopatra didn't actually kill herself? Octavian had her murdered and since he was the man with absolute power, he could change the story around of how Cleopatra was actually killed. New historical facts today say so that she did NOT commit suicide.



"Ignore the ignorance."

reply

Cleopatra was not a Black women. She was a Greek born in Egypt. It's a common misconception since she was born in Egypt.


Trina said: <<< Actually, people in Egypt are Mid-Eastern>>>

The Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans, and not 'Middle Easterns', also know as Arabs. The Arabs along with Macedonians and Persians, ect invaded Egypt. None of those people are indigenous to Egypt. Arabs are NOT aboriginal people of Egypt.


Foton-You are NOT a decendent of Ancient Egyptians. And, yes, Egyptians were Black, much like the whole continent of Africa. I recommend you engage in some research beyond modern 'history'.


Jared-

We DO know who the ancient Egyptians were. They were Black. No amount of supremacy, whether its from Whites or Arabs or Blacks, will deter historical accuracy.







reply

I'm pretty sure that's not right. The art found on temple walls and on scrolls and papyrus show them as being typically mediterranean and olive skinned rather than black.

reply

webmaster-1348 said:
-----------------
Foton-You are NOT a decendent of Ancient Egyptians. And, yes, Egyptians were Black, much like the whole continent of Africa. I recommend you engage in some research beyond modern 'history'.
-----------------

Egyptians were not "black, much like the whole continent of Africa." They're like the rest of other native northern Africans before Arab influence. Take a look at the Berbers of Morocco, many of them to this day are still unmixed so they retain their look from thousands of years ago. That's a good picture of what the Egyptians looked like in the past. Mediterranean (a tad darker than Euro-mediterranean) skin, fine features, and fairly straight hair. It's obviously pointed out by geographical distribution. Africans in the very center of Africa are very dark, and as you start moving up north they get progressively lighter and lighter and their features thin out. It goes this way all the way until you get to northern Europeans which are very white. It's not just "all Africa = black, all Europe = white." There's quite a bit of middle ground there, regardless of what race you want to lump who into.

reply

It's not just "all Africa = black, all Europe = white." There's quite a bit of middle ground there, regardless of what race you want to lump who into.


Indeed. Races, especially colour-coded ones, are nonsense anyway.

And I am not sure what this thread has to do with this mini-series anyway, the actress playing Cleopatra is not African, she is Hispanic of very clear Native American and Spanish mixture, and I believe she is Hungarian and German also.


Formerly KingAngantyr

reply

Cleopatra should be played a Ginger actress, that's how the historians describe her.

"It's made up of facts, that doesn't make it true"-Spencer Hastings

reply

Indeed. A ginger Greek actress to be more accurate.

Formerly KingAngantyr

reply

Are any modern Greeks natural Red Heads? Modern Maceodnians are mostly descended from later Slavic migrations. The Ancient Macedonians were more akin to the Irish and Scottish then anyone in the Aegen.

"I knew it, I'm surrounded by @$$Holes"

reply

Descendants of Macedonians live in the Greek state of Macedonia. The Macedonians were as Greek as modern day Spartans and were actually Dorians, like the Spartans. Modetn day Greeks are the same people as ancient Greeks so why wouldn't they have red hair today? And Macedonians are no more related to Scots (who are a mix of various ethnic groups such as Gaels and Inglis, as it is more a national denonym) than any Greeks.

This damned jury's getting me. If I don't get away soon I'll be going blood-simply like the natives.

reply

The history of tribal migrations is very complicated.

"I knew it, I'm surrounded by @$$Holes"-Dark Helmet, Spaceballs

reply

The history of tribal migrations is very complicated.


It is but it hasn't quite changed the population of Greece in the modern era. No more than anywhere really IMO. Even places like Ireland have had about as much migrations.

This damned burg's getting me. If I don't get away soon I'll be going blood-simply like the natives.

reply

ANCIENT egyptians were blakc yes, when egypte was an empire and not a mere province of an assyrian, babylonian, persian, greek or roman empire

reply

The *beep* kings of Egypt were Nubian, and very dark skinned. However, they only ruled Egypt for a few generations. Other short-term rulers of Egypt were the Hittites, Hyksos, and Persians. The rest of the history of Egypt up to the Ptolemies, the native rulers were all olive skinned Mediterranean people like the common Egyptian, Libyan, etc. Then with Ptolemy, the rulers were very light skinned Greeks for about 300 years all the way down to Cleopatra.
The dark skinned Nubian people of Upper Egypt were subjects of the Egyptians for long periods of time, so they would have been imported into the main part of Egypt as slave labor and mercenaries. It is reasonable to assume that they interbred with some of the Egyptians and created mixed offspring, but this would have been largely confined to the slave class and to a lesser extent the commonest class of Egyptian, such as the camp followers.
Quite a bit of tomb art shows the dark skinned Nubians alongside the light skinned Egyptians, so it was clear that the typical Egyptian was not dark skinned.
Interestingly, one of the Egyptian gods, I forget which one, is usually portrayed as being black in tomb paintings.
Regardless of all this, if a black actress (or Asian, or Eskimo, or whatever) can do a good job at portraying Cleopatra, I'm all for it. It isn't important.

reply

What is "black" and what is "white"? These are just terms relating to skin color defined by society. Black people are not actually black, they are different shades of brown, and white people are from pale-pink to yellow.

Society could call Italians black or Ehiopians white if somehow the standards were different. Races blend into each other, and it is obvious that ancient Egyptians were somwhere between white and black.


Now today especially in the US, definiton of "black" is wide and basically includes all people with any kind of Subsaharan feature. What needs to be pointed out is the fact almost all African Americas have some European or Native American ancestry, The average being about 17-25%. This means the so called "lighter skinned" African Americans are almost mulattoes. That is why their skin tone is comparable to ancient Egyptians. If this wasn't the case all American blacks would look like Seal or Djimon Hounsou.

Go to Kenya or Nigeria and compare ordinary people there (not celebrities who are usually lighter) with Will Smith or Terrence Howard, and you will see what i mean.

On the other hand the definiton of white in US is quite narrow (White americans are overwhelmingly of North European dencent so the definiton is White = North and Central European; in many cases excluding even Greeks and Italians), compared to the more objective European definition, which usually includes Turks, Lebanese, Persians and lighter Arabs.


As for the Arab conquest People missunderstand the historic fact that Arabs came to Noth Africa from the East. As it is the case of majority of such conquests, they think this means they completely replaced the indigenous population. In reality the indigenous population only accepted their culure and religion with only minor genetic admixture from the conquerers. The Nile river had very high population density troughout history. Since today's Egyptians are of course overwhelmingly non-black, if ancient Egyptians were, this would mean they had to be completely eradicated and replaced by Arabs, which is very unlikely. Also modern genetic studies show Egptians are descendants of their ancestory who lived around the Nile, and their gene pool has not changed very much in 5 thousand years.

A crowd which is quite representative picture of today's Egpytians

http://shrani.si/f/42/1I/3fJz9Gpq/28670190675cdbb1c5eb.jpg



Also dental and cranial analysis from Mummies shows they are more similar to people of North African, Europe and Middle East, not so much Subsaran Africa, tough some similarities to them is present.

This picture very much debunks the black nationalist claims.

http://shrani.si/f/1/21/1EpjGMCA/1/races2.jpg

The Egyptian is the last one. Look at the facial features which are not similar to the Black guy's jaw, nose and mouth.

What partially contributed to darkness of pigmentation of ancient Egyptians is also exposure to hot sun. Majority of the population were farmers and spent most of the time outside. If you look at the wall paintings the are topless most of the time. The result is the reddish-brownish skin tone observed in the wall paintings and exactly what today's middle easternes look like who are much exposed to the sun.

http://shrani.si/f/1d/c3/2ISU6Tm2/145276066f9ecf80787o.jpg

http://shrani.si/f/2j/bx/2oC3RrT2/414113255bcf86b30c3o.jpg

Also woth noting is the fact Egypt conqered Nubia, and later for a while when Egypt weakened Nubians even ruled Egpyt. Immagine if India came to rule Briain after it's donwfall and much later some people concluded British people were brown, becouse the description of some of their leaders who were actually Indians.

I am white and do not think Ancient Egyptians were. But what bothers me when people want to "steal" an ancient culture from others, such as here some blacks and white nationalists want to steal the civilization from the rightful descendats, in this case today's Egyptians who are Middle Eastern.

reply

No, wherever you got this from, it's not only wrong, but it's nonsense. First, Africa does not equal black people. Africa contained and still contains a range of feature types and skin colors, and it always did, even before persians or greeks, The idea that you seem to have clutched onto where everybody is magically black if you go 50 miles southwest is astonishing just for that. That entire area is extremely packed with people of various kinds and colors.

The true black, not just mocha brown, people originated from the middle three-fifths of the continent, and this makes a lot of sense when you consider how that sits under the equator. People tend to be dark skinned around the equator, and lighter towards the poles, but migration does mix things up a bit.

Egypt, however, has one of the longest, documented visual histories in the history of the world, painted on walls, carved in temples, brushed on papyrus, inlaid in gold...thousands of years worth. Those are Egyptians on those walls, and they're tan, olive, or reddish tan, much like Native Americans in the southern states. They generally have sharp, delicate features, resembling europeans or asians with larger eyes, but in these images there are black people, with classic black features, and there would be: because they were visiting or captured from the areas they were native to, outside of Egypt. Many of those depicted are servants. Don't take that the wrong way though, because the other colors of Egyptians in those scenes are also servants. They were divided more by family ties than race. Everybody is a slave.

I have been reading an uptick of people claiming things like Horus and Osirus were truly balck, take back the black gods, etc...but this is so repugnantly misleading just on the face of it: Horus is a hawk headed God, whose face is made of features. because...Hawk Head! He does not have a Black hawk head, whatever good that would do your movement, and his body is never represented as dark skinned like a nubian, and there are dark skinned people represented, but they are not the majority of the figures.

Saying that Egyptians were black until they got rolled by outsiders is the kind of fantasy you have to be completely ignorant to believe. All of the records of ancient egypt left by the egyptians in paintings and sculptures over thousands of years strongely indicate the opposite. Sometimes they had Nubians over for a birthday party, and you can see the difference in the features side by side on the same wall. It's so clear, if you can be bothered to even look.

reply

King Tut's grandmother, Queen Tiye, does look like a black African to me, so does her son, Akhenaten; and so does King Tut and her other grandchildren, plus her husband Amenhotep III looked black African too (who is known for marrying several foreign wives): http://www.stewartsynopsis.com/images/tiyi2.jpg. I think they say Queen Tiye's father could have been Nubian. Seems like an interesting story that has yet to be told in cinemas. http://youtu.be/j55j1NZoAKk

I honestly don't know how people could look at statues of Amenhotep III and Queen Tiye and say these people were Caucasian or White. Their various statues make them look like Sub-Saharan Africans; and King Tut is their grandson and his own statues have black African features (http://i.imgur.com/fnb7VR3.jpg), yet there's still a huge debate on what race King Tut was. Even this king from the Third Dynasty looks black: http://i.imgur.com/fqwJlzs.jpgBut either way, the whole Egyptian race thing debate could go on forever. I like to think of them as a multiracial society (Egypt today is pretty mixed, one Egyptian could look more Sub-Saharan or Middle Eastern than another; and they don't have demographics separating white from black, they are all Egyptian). I mean, it's a civilization that's thousands of years old and was surrounded by other countries in the Mediterranean, the Middle East, and the Sahara, and, through the Kingdom of Kush, was connected to Sub-Saharan Africa. Egypt was conquered by a variety of different kingdoms/countries, ruled various other regions, and traded with many different groups of people. How could they not be multiracial?

Now King Tut and his family could of been biracial...but, I would not look at any one of their statues (and those of some other Ancient Egyptians), and say, "Hey, that looks like a White person!" How other people do is beyond me. Anyways, I think one DNA testing company from Sweden tried to do some kind of DNA test on him and his father and grandfather and determined that they shared a Y-Haplogroup (R1b1 or R-M343) with most Western Europeans, but that excludes their maternal lineage and doesn't really mean they were Caucasian themselves. It just that they could have had paternal Caucasian ancestry. The belief that this automatically makes him White, like some people say, is wrong. It's a 20,000-34,000 year old haplogroup and people of the Central Sahel Region of Africa (reaching all the way to Equatorial Guinea) share this haplogroup as well that supposedly originated in the Middle East or South Asia. I think you could probably test nearly half of all Black American men and find their Y-Haplogroup or paternal line and match it to the ones shared by Western Europeans (I know you can for my dad because I had his paternal line tested. My father is black and hasn't had a white ancestor since my great-great-great grandfather who fathered my great-great grandfather with a woman from Guinea, West Africa, yet he is of the R1b1 haplogroup, specifically R-U106 which is descendant from R-M343); most of the popular DNA testing companies say they find the average African American to be 20% European. West Africans have only been in America for a few hundred years, think of what that says about the black people in Africa and the admixture there. I think they tested Rameses III's DNA too (http://i.imgur.com/H5HqADU.jpg) and found it to be closest to the Haplogroup E-V38 from E1b1 (a common Sub-Saharan African haplogroup said to originate in West Africa with a frequency rate of 90-100% from various West and South African tribes tested), which can be found in many African males throughout all parts of Africa (West, Central, South, North, and East) and the E-V38 haplogroup seems to be strongest in West and South Africans (like Yoruba, Mandinka, Bamileke, and several other Bantu tribes found in West and South Africa) and lowers the further east you go (though it's strongest at a 47% frequency rate in the nomadic Tuareg people from Niger in Northern and Eastern parts of Africa: http://i57.tinypic.com/alq7ev.png). However, I believe they say DNA testing on mummies isn't 100% accurate. So, it appears the race of Ancient Egyptians is more complicated than just black or white. Africa is the most genetically diverse continent on Earth, so Egypt could have had pharaohs from many different haplogroups throughout the centuries (it is one of the oldest kingdoms on Earth).

reply

The Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans, and not 'Middle Easterns', also know as Arabs.


Actually the Egyptians were an Afro-Asiatic group related to Arabs. And most modern Egyptians are Arabized Egyptians, not actual Arabs. It is for this reason that many spoke of the same families that speak Arabic used to speak Coptic, and a minority still speak it.

They were Black


Only if we use ''black'' to mean darker Afro-Asiatic people. The Afro-Asiatic people of Egyptian are related to Arabs and Berbers. They are not closely related to Sub-Saharan Africans.

Formerly KingAngantyr

reply

[deleted]

funny becuz the exact opposite (could) be true, namely that she was of arian race, considering that Cleopatra was from the Ptolemaus family, one of the 4 generals who took a forth of the greek empire, made by Alexander The Great (a blonde boy)

nuff said?

reply

Nobody really knows what she looked like.
Upon doing some research on her origins, I'm beginning to visualize her looking rather like your average italian female of today. Dark hair, dark eyes and olive skin.

The Ptolemy dynasty was descended from the Greek Macedonian Ptolemy Soter, established as ruler of Egypt by Alexander the Great's conquest of Egypt in 305 B.C.E. (In other words, they were imperialist outsiders.) Many of their marriages were incestuous, with brothers marrying sisters - but not all the children born are known to have had both fathers and mothers who were Ptolemies.

We are not certain of the heritage of Cleopatra's mother or her paternal grandmother. That leaves 50% to 75% of her genetic heritage unknown -- and ripe for speculation.

Is there any evidence that either her mother or paternal grandmother was a black African? No. "We don't know the heritage of" means just that. We don't know.

Is there any evidence that either of those women were not black Africans? No, by the same reasoning.

reply

Nobody really knows what she looked like.
Upon doing some research on her origins, I'm beginning to visualize her looking rather like your average italian female of today. Dark hair, dark eyes and olive skin.

The Ptolemy dynasty was descended from the Greek Macedonian Ptolemy Soter, established as ruler of Egypt by Alexander the Great's conquest of Egypt in 305 B.C.E. (In other words, they were imperialist outsiders.) Many of their marriages were incestuous, with brothers marrying sisters - but not all the children born are known to have had both fathers and mothers who were Ptolemies.

We are not certain of the heritage of Cleopatra's mother or her paternal grandmother. That leaves 50% to 75% of her genetic heritage unknown -- and ripe for speculation.

Is there any evidence that either her mother or paternal grandmother was a black African? No. "We don't know the heritage of" means just that. We don't know.

Is there any evidence that either of those women were not black Africans? No, by the same reasoning.


Yes we do know the heritage of both her mother and paternal grandmother and they were NOT black Africans. They were of Greek-Macedonian ancestry more then likely Ptolemaic Princess and Queens themselves because the Ptolemies were very xenophobic and didn't inter marry or produce heirs to their Dynasties with people who were NOT like them. Plus we have plenty of descriptions and depictions of what Cleopatra looked like and she was not black African or mixed black or whatever, all her ancient depictions from her lifetime clearly show a white woman with fair complexion and auburnish hair color, which by the way fair coloring was very common among the Ptolemies.

reply

I am Egyptian woman myself ,and please let me sort somethings about my country as it hurts me so much to read all those horrible misconcepts about Egypt & Egyptian people !
First of all Cleopatra is AN Egyptian Queen ,but she ruled Egypt during plotemey era . Some would wonder why she is Egyptian then???!!
Egypt is like a crucible it absorbs every new comer to it and after mixing with its people you are Egyptian to the bones . In fact people here still have the same features and skin colour of the ancient Egyptiansm and their way of life (Which Westerns like to call Pharoes ) Pharoes were ancient Egyptians also . And they are not black by the way . We don't discrimnate people here by the colour of their skin and catgories them into black & white !!!! You can find a blonde, a brunette and black walking down the street and they are all the same thing Egyptians .
Another thing I was so frustrated and disgusted about what other thnik of Cleopatra . Egyptian women are very strong and respectable and they are no prostiutes !!! It hurts any Egyptian woman to see such a degrading portayal of women in her country as this completely is bare from truth.

reply

[deleted]

If Cleopatra hadn't murdered Arsinoe, Arsinoe would have murdered her. Besides, thats alot of conjecture. The only thing known for sure is that Cleopatra wanted Caesar to have Arsinoe killed, because she would be dangerous if left alive. And since Arsinoe was an active supporter of Caesar's murderers, Cleopatra was right.
Besides, it was part and parcel of being a Ptolemy to murder family members

reply

[deleted]

They crowned her Queen of Egypt when they went East..and she declared that they were hero's for killing Ceasar. Thats pretty self-explanatory as to where she stood on the whole subject.
Besides the point...Arsinoe was a nobody. Who cares that Cleopatra murdered her? I'd rather read stories and history books with Cleopatra in them, then Arsinoe.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

She was not black. Also Egypt at that time was not even part of Africa. Egypt was its own thing and was mostly composed of greeks and jews. When you traveled down the Nile for about 7 days (their time) you would run into Africa proper where the citizens were black.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

It doesn't matter what egyptions looked like because she was GREEK.

reply

Can't we all just get along?

reply


Really, this is a stupid discution, because there are DRAWINGS and PICTURES that show that ancient egyptians were olive skined, not black. There's visual proof of that... DUH!

«And that's all I have to say 'bout that»

reply

So you've never read ANYTHING about them and their history. A lot of the pharoes before her were black and olive because they were not part of the same family so in keeping with tradition they were all painted to look like so their line would appear timless and unchanging (much to her sons dipleasure). Read a book!

reply

The more we get together, the happier we'll be.

reply

Exactly! If Ancient Egyptians WERE black, then why would they paint themselves as tan on their walls and murals?

Some people are so gullible when it comes to the Afro-centric views of Egypt.

If you can't fix it, you gotta stand it. -- Ennis Del Mar in Brokeback Mountain

reply

Get your facts stright they painted themselves brown and black a lot on
the walls too rhion
You must be totally taking in by one of history little white lies



stop quoting homo movies ok!

reply

[deleted]

nobody has denied that she is an Egyptian Queen, but her roots are not egyptian or africa, but she has ptolemian roots, aka she is teh daughter of a greek

reply

you sound quiet ignorant for someone living in egypt, sometimes the real truth hurts so much, that you cannot accept it, cleopatra was a mere tool in the hands of the men back in those days, sorry if it hurts

reply

[deleted]

Cleopatra was not a Black women. She was a Greek born in Egypt. It's a common misconception since she was born in Egypt.


Trina said: <<< Actually, people in Egypt are Mid-Eastern>>>

The Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans, and not 'Middle Easterns', also know as Arabs. The Arabs along with Macedonians and Persians, ect invaded Egypt. None of those people are indigenous to Egypt. Arabs are NOT aboriginal people of Egypt.


Foton-You are NOT a decendent of Ancient Egyptians. And, yes, Egyptians were Black, much like the whole continent of Africa. I recommend you engage in some research beyond modern 'history'.


Jared-

We DO know who the ancient Egyptians were. They were Black. No amount of supremacy, whether its from Whites or Arabs or Blacks, will deter historical accuracy.







reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

You need to study about the Ancient Egyptians a little further. Look at some photagraphs or something. By now everyone knows they were black. You were left behind or blind to the truth. Black is not just a skin color--it is a state of mind (ignorance). Even as mixed as the modern Egyptians are today they are still black--whatever their shade. I suggest you read Chiekh Anta Diop's book "African Origins of Civilization: Myth or Reality". IT IS AN EYE OPENER!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

First of all, very little is known for certain about Cleopatra. She was definitely of Macedonian descent. Alexander the Great conquered Egypt and died at the age of 33, after which his general divided up his territory, and Ptolemy I got Egypt and started the Ptolemaic line. Cleopatra MIGHT have had some Egyptian blood in her; while generally the Ptolemies married their sisters, this was not always the case. However, it is extremely unlikely that Cleopatra was even slightly Egyptian, since Alexandria had a very large and very affluent Greek community under the Ptolemies. Contemporary depictions of her--in busts, coins, etc., show a woman with bulgy eyes, a crooked nose, and a long neck (she was, after all, very inbred).

Despite her Greek descent, she was the first of the Ptolemies to speak colloquial Egyptian, and she clearly identified herself as Egyptian--she believed that she was a reincarnation of Isis (not unusual for Egyptian kings, who all identified themselves with Horus/Osiris and Amun-Re).

And really, no one knows whether the ancient Egyptians were white or black or Middle-Eastern. Previously to the Ptolemaic period, the Nubians (who were black) had invaded Egypt and served as kings for a short time, before being ousted by the Libyans (who were white). But technically both Nubians and Libyans were Egyptians, so ancient Egyptians' skin color really depended on where you were in Egypt.

reply

The modern Egptians are direct descendants of the ancient Egyptians. The population only became Arabised in the 13th and 14th centuries etc adopting the muslim faith and the Arabic language just as the modern Iraqis are descentants from the Ancient Babylonians, Akkadians, Assyrians, Sumerians and the Lebanese from the Ancient Phoenicians. The ancient populations of the near east- from the tigris and euphrates to eastern meditteranean seaboard, just south of Anatolia- complextion was from dark to light brown with black straight or woolly hair, they were diffently not Caucasian Germanic/Nordic types so perpetuated by the Eurocentric film and television industry for so long. I remember the BBC did a historical documentary on Jesus as part of their promotion on the Radio Times they had an artist depiction of what an 1st century AD Jew/Hebrew would look like or what would Jesus look like we was bronzed-brown skin pigmentation with straight black hair not an European Caucasoid type.

reply

[deleted]

this is only a recent thing the ancients never had ideas about black or white especially those from the medtereran sea who were olive brown skin color both egyptians and greek alike. and eventually the ptomely dynasty mixed they did mixed it was once in a while but they did. never listen to white historian who think white are supeior and never listen to a black historian who think blacks are superior. the ancients really did not have race and all that racism thing this a fairly recent idea about 500 years

it's better to love and lose to love than not to love at all

reply

this is only a recent thing the ancients never had ideas about black or white especially those from the medtereran sea who were olive brown skin color both egyptians and greek alike. and eventually the ptomely dynasty mixed they did mixed it was once in a while but they did. never listen to white historian who think white are supeior and never listen to a black historian who think blacks are superior. the ancients really did not have race and all that racism thing this a fairly recent idea about 500 years

it's better to love and lose to love than not to love at all


No they didn't mix and what is recent is Afrocentric false claims in trying to make white Europeans like the Ptolemies into 'blacks or mixed' just because they ruled over an 'African' country. NEWSFLASH: ROYALS NEVER MIX WITH NATIVE POPULATIONS. I suggest people actually read some credible history on this Dynasty. THIS is what the real Cleopatra looked like...does she look like she 'mixed' or 'black'? No because she wasn't. The Ptolemies looked down their noses at native Egyptians and black Africans and neither did they intermix with them to produce heirs to their thrones who they believed only true Hellenic Ptolemeis were worthy to rule over them and native Egyptians as well as black Africans were not true Hellenic Ptolemeis.
http://www.wc.pdx.edu/cleopatra/cleopatra_vii.jpg

Both set of Cleopatra VII grandparents and her parents were of the Ptolemaic bloodline, in other words EUROPEANS. Ancient busts and coins of Cleopatra depict her Caucasian ancestry, not mixed. Aside from birth marriage and death records of the Ptolemies, ancient artifacts and coins that clearly show the Ptolemies were of 'white' European origins, other evidence that Cleopatra and the Ptolemies had zero African blood in them is the fact that Cleopatra's FULL sister Berenice's show she was fully of EUROPEAN Caucasian origins and given Ptolemiac birth records show us that she was Cleopatra's FULL sister, meaning they both had the same mom and dad, well there is another nail in the coffin of those pseudo Afrocentric trying to turn Cleopatra into something that she was not, meaning this is more evidence that Cleopatra had zero African blood in her. Oh and this is how Bernice, full sister of Cleopatra, looked. Notice the European 'white' facial characteristics, no black admixture to them:
http://www.margheritacampaniolo.it/archeo/ptolemaic%5B1%5D%5B1%5D.gif
http://www.margheritacampaniolo.it/archeo/berenice%5B2%5D.jpg
http://www.narmer.pl/dyn/ima/berenike2.jpg

reply

ok you right i just spoke to a historian and he said cleopatra was greek but he did say the people around the meditterran were of a light olive brown to dark olive brown skin. race and racism he said is a recent thing the ancients were not racist as we put it today and yes the ptomilies did mix but cleopatra and bernenice were fully white and yes dynasty to do mix when very rarely but they do once in a while
it's better to love and lose to love than not to love at all

reply

[deleted]

I'm really not here to debate this but, personally I like the image that Michelangelo portrayed. It captures african and european at once, the hair of caucasians, the physical features of africans, and it is probably the most realistic depiction of her, maybe not realistic but it has what everyone wants her to be which is either white, or black, either way she was a successful queen.

reply

[deleted]

Considering the geography, it would be logical if we thought of Cleopatra being of a dark olive skin colour. Egypt is about level, laterally, with the Arabian countries so it would make sense if she were not black as there is the whole thing about the skin becoming darker as you go further to towards the equator because of the concentration of sunlight.

Egypt is in the Northern part of the African continent so naturally people's skin colour would be lighter than is she was from Kenya, for example. If she was, like many people have pointed out, of Greek descent it would further emphasise this skin colour as they are of the dark olive skin type.

Either way, I don't think her skin colour really matters. It doesn't really change a whole lot of history. It's the actions of people which are documented.

reply

Considering the geography, it would be logical if we thought of Cleopatra being of a dark olive skin colour. Egypt is about level, laterally, with the Arabian countries so it would make sense if she were not black as there is the whole thing about the skin becoming darker as you go further to towards the equator because of the concentration of sunlight.

Egypt is in the Northern part of the African continent so naturally people's skin colour would be lighter than is she was from Kenya, for example. If she was, like many people have pointed out, of Greek descent it would further emphasise this skin colour as they are of the dark olive skin type.

Either way, I don't think her skin colour really matters. It doesn't really change a whole lot of history. It's the actions of people which are documented.

reply

Who cares what color she was lets just get along please!!!!

reply

Indeed. I don't think she was black either. There is no record saying that any of her family were black, so she couldn't have been either. Her family were Greek. It doesn't really matter cause we just don't know, but I'm pretty sure she must have been Greek.

-

Shooting Stars [HMC Site] - http://sophie-lou.tripod.com/

reply

Cleopatra was Macedonian Greek; they typically had fair skin with blonde hair and green eyes, or olive skin with brown hair and brown eyes- this is from research that I've done. There is talk that maybe one of her relatives- I'm thinking it was her grandmother but I could be wrong- was of another race. But during that time period there were so many people of different races and varying skin colors living in Egypt that it is hard to pinpoint just one as being the 'true' Egyptian.

reply

some say Jesus was black too

reply

Let's not even start that discussion, he was a hebrew descendent, it was likely that he was dark skinned(not necessarily black), but that is for another day.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

exoticbeautiful91, thank you for pointing that out. Although, I think it was her grandmother (who was acually the mother of both her parents) who was not a Ptolemy. She was a concubine/slave and was likely of African descent. I personally hold the belief that she was of both greek and Egyptian (African) heritage. Also, I would like to add that the idea of Cleopatra being black is not a new idea put together by contemporary African-Americans. According to esteemed researcher and author J.A. Rogers, Shakespeare described her as black and many from the Renaissance thought of her as a black women as well. There honestly is no real proof as to what she was, but saying she was white because she came from a greek line does not cut it. Also, as a person who as studied ancient Eygptian art, Egyptian queens and kings often did not look like their "portraits". These portraits often served some sort of purpose.

reply

People are repeating misleading myths that only were brought forth in recent times. There is absolutely no proof that either of Cleopatra's grandmothers, mother, father or whoever was of Egyptian or African origins.

Most reliable scholars admit Cleopatra was not of African/Egyptian descent. Even Afrocentrism scholars such as Ibrahim Sundiata, Asante and even Erich S. Gruen of wayout-liberal Berkeley tacitly admit that there is no evidence which point to either of Cleopatra's grandmothers of having African/Egyptian blood.

The Ptolemy Dynasty were very xenophobian but the xenophobia that they had, had nothing to do with race. The Macedonian Royalty, which Cleopatra was part of, have always believed they were descendants of the Greek Hero Hercules. To keep their Herculanian blood line "pure" the Ptolemaic Dynasty inbred like crazy. This belief is one that even Cleopatra herself believed in. She made sure she had her children from Roman families who supposedly traced their genes to the Trojans. This was not by accident on her part. Her son Ptolemy Caesar, she had with Caesar, who's family traced their well-known patrician family (gens Julia), to Julus, the son of the Trojan prince Aeneas, who was the supposed son of the Goddess Aphrodite/Venus. The earliest Hellenic explanations, in fact, had Greeks themselves, claiming the Trojans as ancestors there-fore ancestors of Rome - a fact that Cleopatra being of Greek origin would have been familiar with. As might be expected, these stories began to take shape in the era of Greek colonization in the west ala modern day Italy.

Antony's children, Cleopatra Selene and Alexander Helios, she believed she had with a family, Mark Antony's, which claimed descent from Anton, son of the Greek hero Hercules. Her alliance with Mark Antony was not only on the basis as lovers but infact both believed their families were descendants of Hercules there fore in a way making them kinfolk - in other words their families were related through Hercules. I know, I know, today we look upon Hercules as a fictional Greek mythical figure but to the ancients their mythology was actually real, in other words they believed in it as some Christians believe in Jesus, the Jews in God and the Buddist etc. etc. etc. (i.e. as really historical figures).

What people fail to mention about Cleopatra being of African descent is the fact that this theory was not raised until the 16th century - that is thousands of years AFTER Cleopatra's death. Most writers who question her heritage are not even ancient writers but modern revisionists.

The first American writer to suggest that Cleopatra had a black ancestor was J.A. Rogers, in World's Great Men of Color. Rogers muddled the Sibling-Loving family tree to the point were some use his theories as 'proof' of Cleo's questionable heritage. For one he claims her father was Ptolemy XIII, which is wrong, he was Ptolemy XII; he claims her grandfather was Ptolemy XI, which was wrong again, it was Ptolemy IX.

Another of his sources was the play Antony and Cleopatra by Shakespeare. Shakespear descripes Cleopatra as being "tawny" or "mulatto". Personally I wouldn't give much credit to Shakespear's authority on Ptolemaic geneology.

Roger's other 'evidence' of Cleo's questionable parentage was Ripley's Believe It Or Not where Ripley says "he has proof that Cleo was 'fat and black'" even though he hasn't produced any evidence of the fact to back up this claim.

Another perpetrator of false Cleopatra information is by modern writer John Henrik Clarke, professor at Hunter College. He uses a modern portrait of a black Cleopatra to support his claims. He also says that in the Book of Acts Cleopatra describes herself as "black" but does not give the chapter and verse that this claim is made - the reason for this is that anyone familiar with the Book of Acts would tell you Cleopatra is not even mentioned in the Book of Acts. A lot of modern writers have used Roger's and Clarke's illogical/false theories as their bases to support the questionable birth of Cleopatra.

The Ptolemaic Dynasty followed the matrilinear nature of succession, a system in which one belongs to one's mother's lineage; inheritance of property or titles through the female line. A tradition that many ancient Greeks followed since the times of the Minoans and Mycenaeans. If Ptolemy XII's mother was not of Ptolemiac blood, there were other Ptolemaic children who's moms were that would have been chosen as rulers. For Ptolemy to become a ruler his mother had to have been of Ptolemaic bloodline. The Ptolemy also believed that the "sister-born" was a prerequisite of legitimacy and for a Ptolemaic princess to be a recognised sister she must also have been a queen. The biological mother of Ptolemy XII had to have been in a relationship with Ptolemy IX and she also had to have had sufficent standing for her son to be recognized as Ptolemy IX's heir. A non Ptolemic concubine's illegitimate off spring would never hold the status of ruling over the Ptolemy royal house hold since we have evidence that there were other legitament Ptolemaic children in the royal household to take that spot. Cleopatra VII herself followed the family practice of marrying within the family. She married her two brothers (Ptolemy XIII and XIV) in succession (after the first died in suspicious circumstances, she had the second murdered).

There is evidence which points to the fact that Ptolemy XII's mother, Cleo's grandmom, was Cleopatar IV, she was not a ruling Queen when she had Ptolemy XII but that does not mean she was not of Ptolemaic descent. Ptolemy XII's father, Ptolemy IX, was married for a brief period to his sister, Cleopatra IV, who was not a concubine as some have falsely suggested. It was during this period that they had Ptolemy XII, Cleo's dad, before Ptolemy IX was king of Egypt. They were both forcibly divorced by their mother, Cleopatra III, because she wanted Ptolemy IX to marry their other sister, Cleopatra Selena. Since Cleopatra IV, was not a ruling queen when she had Ptolemy XII, Cleo's dad, then any mention of her would be removed and disregarding. Thus labels such as "bastard" and "illegitimate" were given to Ptolemy XII but not because he was of an "unknown" concubine or whatever origin but because his mother was not a ruling queen when she had him. From his titulary Ptolemy XII claims to be heir to the god Soter but does not mention being heir to his mother. This is because his mother was not a ruling queen when she had him but she was of Ptolemaic descent for Ptolemy XII to be giving rule over Egypt, especially when legitament Ptolemaic children were a plenty in the royal household and could have been chosen if Ptolemy XII's mom was not of a Ptolemaic bloodline.

Just in case anyone is wondering: Paternal Grandmother ~ Cleopatra IV[famed Cleo's grandmom ~ dad's mom] she was the daughter of Cleopatra III Euergetis and Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II Tryphon ~ her parents were uncle and niece ~ Cleopatra IV had with her husband and brother Ptolemy IX Soter II ~ Ptolemy XII Neos Dionysos Philopator Philadelphos ~ he was famed Cleopatra's father; Maternal Grandmother ~ was Berenice III Cleopatra Philopator[famed Cleo's grandmom ~ mom's mom] she was the daughter of Ptolemy IX Soter II & Cleopatra Selene I and first cousin/sister to famed Cleo's father which I will explain in detail below ~ her parents were brother and sister their parents were Cleopatra III Euergetis and Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II Tryphon ~ (in other words Ptolemy IX, Cleopatra IV and Cleopatra Selene I were all siblings) ~ Berenice III Cleopatra Philopator had with her husband and uncle Ptolemy X Alexander I Philometor ~ who was also the son of Cleopatra III Euergetis and Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II Tryphon ~ Cleopatra V Tryphaena ~ she was famed Cleopatra's mother. Yes for those who have noticed famed Cleopatra's paternal and maternal grandfather is one and the same, he had children with both his sisters: one gave birth to Cleo's father, Ptolemy XII Neos Dionysos Philopator Philadelphos, and the other gave birth to Cleo's maternal grandmother, Berenice III; Cleo's maternal grandmother, Berenice, married her uncle(Bernice's father and mother's other brother, Ptolemy X Alexander); from that union they had Cleo's mother, Cleopatra V Tryphaena; Cleo's mother, Cleopatra V, then married Cleo's father, Ptolemy XII, who also happened to be Cleopatra V's uncle/cousin. Oh and just in case anyone is wondering about fame Cleo's great-grandmother, Cleopatra III Euergetis, who was both the paternal and maternal great-grandmother of fame Cleo, she was the daughter of Ptolemy VI Philometor and Cleopatra II, her parents were brother and sister. If anything the Ptolemies had some Persian in them. One of the Ptolemies very early great relatives, Ptolemy III Euergetes Tryphon, married Berenice II who was from the Greek rulers of the Seleucid Dynasty and we know that Berenice's great-grandfather, the Greek ruler Seleucus I Nicator, one of Alexander the Great's generals and creator of the Seleucus Dynasty, married the Persian Princess Apame, the only one according to ancient texts, of the Seleucid rulers to marry a non-Hellenic woman. Seleucus I Nicator and Apame's son, was Antiochus I Soter; Antiochus married the Greek Macedonian Princess Stratonice; Antiochus and Stratonice were materinal grandparents to Bernice II, their daughter Arsinoe Apama was Berenice II's mother; Arsinoe Apama husband and Bernice II's father was the Greek Macedonian ruler Magas. So you could say its through Berenice II, who's maternal great-grandmother was Persian, that the Ptolemy had something like 5% Persian in them.

Cleopatra VII spoke several languages for diplomatic purposes such as Latin and Egyptian but her first language was Greek. None of the former Ptolemaic rulers spoke any other langauge but Greek. Cleopatra however knew that being able to communicate in other peoples languages would help her gain the power which she was aiming to achieve. Plutarch tells us that her linguist skills were "extraordinary". He says she spoke 'most languages' and there were but few of the foreign ambassadors to whom she needed an interpreter for. Some of the languages which he specifies were - aside from Greek of course - Latin, Egyptian, Ethiopian, Coptic, Hebrew, Syrian, South Central Semitic, Persian and Mede(probably something close to Avestan and Scythian). Scholars have found her handwriting in Greek on royal decree. She chose to portray herself as an Greek and Egyptian not because she was an Egyptian biologically, but because she was ambitious to stay in power.

reply

Whoever said that Egyptians and all Pharoahs aren't black, can just *beep* it. If the Egyptians are so Middle Eastern to you (I'm trying not to sound racist) then why aren't in the Middle East? Egypt is Africa (look at the damn map), so they are of course black. If they had declare Egypt as a part of Middle East, then y'all stupid heads can tell me something. So what you're telling me is for example a black girl saying she's a white girl or puerto rican or whatever that she's not.

Cleopatra wasn't black, then why in the hell she's Queen of Egypt and not the Queen of Macedonia, huh?




Say who are and what not you'll be,

"All of y'all can kiss my black ass"
Steve Martin "Bringing Down the House"

reply

Cleopatra wasn't black, then why in the hell she's Queen of Egypt and not the Queen of Macedonia, huh?


Yup, you got it right, Cleopatra wasn't black, I suggest you learn the difference between people migrating to an area and ruling over it and that people do actually migrate to different regions of the world and it does not mean they are actually "natives" to those regions, i.e. what's your explanation of White South Africans in that part of the world...they are really native Africans but just turned white? Egypt, specifically the city of Alexandria which was build by Greeks, was populated and ruled by Greeks from 332 BC until the Romans took over after Cleopatra's death and was for centuries the center of Greek culture. Natives Egyptians were the subjugated people of their Greek rulers. Even the title of Pharaoh, which means "Great House", a designation of the palace, actually comes to us from the Greek language. The Egyptian word for "Pharaoh" is actually Per-aa. Not one of the Ptolemy Kings and Queens were African, Egyptian, Middle Eastern, or whatever biological descent; biologically they were as much native "Egyptian" as the White South Africans are to South Africa. Nationally, meaning they were born in Egypt, yes they were, but being actual native Egyptians in the senses that their origins were from there? Nope they were not and not one person who has studied Egyptian history would mistake them for being such. They also looked down upon their native Egyptian subjects and not one of them even spoke Egyptian, they all spoke Greek; Cleopatra was the first the last and the only one of the Ptolemy to learn the language but that was more for political reasons then anything else since she also spoke numerious other languages. Of all foreing Egyptian rulers the Ptolemy Dynasty were the least Egyptian. I suggest you actually read some legit history books instead of the back of cereal boxes.

"Even though they adopted Egyptian customs to a certain degree, the Ptolemaic kings and queens were Greek. They spoke Greek and they thought that Greek culture and peoples were better than Egyptian culture and peoples. Greek became the state language, and cities were renamed. In fact, the word "Egypt" is a Greek word (the Egyptian word is "Kmt" or Kemet). On the whole, native Egyptians occupied the lowest social positions. The Ptolemies, though, as well as their Greek administrators, were highly tolerant and even interested in foreign religions. The most enduring cultural product they produced was a Greek translation of the Hebrew scriptures; the Ptolemies were interested in the Hebrew religion because of the large number of Jews living in Egypt at the time. Because of this translation, the Hebrew scriptures became one of the most important documents in the history of Western culture; had they ignored the book, it would probably have faded into the dust of history within a few hundred years."
http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/EGYPT/PTOLEMY.HTM
~Washington State University

"The achievements of the Greeks in the ancient world, by no means few, may have reached their peak in the city of Alexandria. No less a ruler than its namesake, Alexander III of Macedonia (Alexander the Great), Alexandria dominated the eastern Mediterranean world culturally, politically, and economically for more than nine hundred years, the latter three hundred of which it competed with even the eastern capital of the Byzantine Empire, the famous Constantinople. .... The arrival of the Greeks brought an unprecedented amount of change in Egypt as they overlaid the existing society with that of their own. At first glance, the Græco-Macedonian period seems to lack the romance and awe of the Pharaohs who came before, but it was during this time, between Alexander's conquest and the Arab takeover of Alexandria in AD 642 that Egypt made some of its most significant contributions to the classical world, as well as absorbing its influences. ...... Alexander the Great took Egypt from the Persians in 332 BC and made it a part of the the Greek Empire. .... For the next two-and-a-half centuries, the Ptolemaic dynasty of the Greeks would successfully rule Egypt, mingling Hellenic traditions with the mighty legacy of the Pharaohs."
http://www.touregypt.net/alexhis1.htm
~Tour of Egypt

By the way, Egypt still has a pretty big influencial Greek community and when you drive through the gates of the city Alexandria side by side in huge big letters the city's name is written in Arabic and Greek. Oh and the only Egyptian woman to ever win the Miss World pageant was of GREEK ORIGINS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigone_Costanda

Here you go, here are a few more Greek-Egyptians...look at their features...they all have Greek features.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Greek_Egyptians

reply

[deleted]

She might not have looked exactly like Elizabeth Taylor, but Liz was a far better casting choice than oh, say...Whoopi Goldberg.


You can say that again.

reply

[deleted]

Cleopatra wasn't black, but Egypt did have a reign of black Pharoes. The Egyptians skin color was more light brownish resembling those of the modern Middle East and the debate about blacks is because the Nubians who were south of Egypt invaded and conquered Egypt. The Nubians had a dark black skin resembling most of what people think to be Africa.

reply

[deleted]

You are a very ignorant individual and your knowledge of history is very lacking. No pictures or depictions of Cleopatra show her light brown or tanned or whatever. The two official sculptures which we have and know that they are of the Queen show her as a white individuals with Greek features. Cleopatra was of Greek Macedonian descent who's family intermarried one another. Her family didn't want to intermix with anyone who wasn't of the same Greek Royal Household as them, never mind intermixing with total foreingers. How moronic ignorant.

reply

There have been many depictions (mostly from native egyptians) depicting cleopatra in many shades ranging from tan to ebony. I'm not saying that she was, I am only correcting the statement made. And for Lost, because the world is in a state of mind that light is beautiful, and if "the majority" did admit that they were beautiful, intelligent, and strong, then they would have to look at them as if they're human beings, or worse, equals...and we don't want that, now do we??

reply

No you are wrong, they are not many depictions of Cleopatra, there only TWO depiction which scholars confirmed are really of Queen Cleopatra and they do NOT depict her as tan and they defiantly do NOT depict her as "ebony". People need to get their facts straight and stop spreading Afrocentric crap.

reply

Okay, first of all you don't have to get so defensive, gosh. Second, I said they're are many depictions not "many confirmed depictions." So before you start screaming white power, read AND comprehend, not assume, because you know what happens when you assume? You make an a** out of yourself.
one love
yaweh

reply

The only one making an a** out of themselves is you since you ass-ume that some unaccounted for Egyptian depictions mean Cleoptra was BLACK or tan or whatever. Second of all, this has nothing to do with White Power and everything to do with historical content, so don't go playing the freaken race card with me. If you actually read any of posts, you would have known that I call people with EUROCENTRIC views just as moronic and STUPID as those who hold ignorant AFROCENTIC views. Get your facts straight. Once more there are NOT "many" depictions of Cleopatra as tan, black, gold, or whatever, period. Those Egyptian depictions of Cleopatra do not show her as anything other then being of GREEK MACEDONIAN descent. And please do not tell me that you are basing this ignorant view on the fact that some of the Egyptian works that some claim being "Cleopatra" are made from certain materials which are dark or gold coloring 'cause if that is the case, then I suggest you take a class on ancient art and learn what that really means...I'll give you a hint, it is not suppose to depict a person's skin tonations that's for sure.

reply

Well apart from some modern Afrocentric views, there is no evidence what so ever to support this audacious claim of Cleo being anything but Hellinic in origin. But like Alexander claimed by the homosexual community, Orpheus by the Bulgarians, the Makedones themselves claimed by Slavs, even Homer claimed to be a Turk.... every wanna-be scholar with an agenda to promote makes claims on Hellinic history.

Now to all those that support the rediculous, "Egypt is in Africa = Egyptians black" analogy.
Please do explain the blonde hair of Queen Hatshepsut (long blonde to be exact), the reknowned pre-dynastic mummy niknamed "Ginger" (do to the hair color) found in the British Museum, Yuya-(Joseph II) dated 1400BC and his wife Thuya also found to be blonde and Caucasian, RamsesII the red-head...etc

There is far too much evidence to simply overlook.

reply

I wasn't assuming anything.I know the geneology of Cleopatra isn't native egyptian(black/nubian), I find it perfectly ironic that you all want blacks to get away from afrocentric views yet you insist on imposing that if white people said it MUST be true! And just for your own personal addition of information I know many egyptians and they happen to be all different colors. So before the pot calls the kettle black or in this case white. Just realize that the stupid things running around in your head are actually being broadcasted.thank you

One Love
Yaweh

reply

I wasn't assuming anything.I know the geneology of Cleopatra isn't native egyptian(black/nubian), I find it perfectly ironic that you all want blacks to get away from afrocentric views yet you insist on imposing that if white people said it MUST be true!


Irony, my friend is your rediculous comment of 'whites saying so' when you allegedly know her true origin.

reply

It was a general statement. Like that Jesus was white.

reply

It was a general statement. Like that Jesus was white.


Oh please, do not tell us your one of those people who actually believes Israelites being of Semitic branch actual means of a different 'race' rather then linguistics, a theory that once more is based mostly on modern idealistic views and not anthropological evidence. Yeah, right, the Israelites, who were/are just as xenophobic if not more so of non Jews then the Greeks were/are.

reply

I find it perfectly ironic that you all want blacks to get away from afrocentric views yet you insist on imposing that if white people said it MUST be true!


Unlike your false theories, its not because "white people said it" that it must be true BUT unlike the Afrocentric theories thrown around by some individuals, what I am saying is based on HISTORICAL EVIDENCE, heck by your theories, you might as well claim Alexander as such too.

reply

No I beleive that jesus was jesus, nothing less.History is told through the eyes of those who won, unfortunately that being "whites" call them what you want.

reply

Whatever.

reply

Apro I do have a question, what exactly was her mother, because there was speculation that she wasn't Greek.

reply

Apro I do have a question, what exactly was her mother, because there was speculation that she wasn't Greek.


Nope, no speculations what so ever, Cleopatra VII's mother was Greek and of the Ptolemaic family branch ~ her mother, Cleopatra V, was her father's niece/cousin:

Paternal Grandmother ~ Cleopatra IV[famed Cleo's grandmom ~ dad's mom] she was the daughter of Cleopatra III Euergetis and Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II Tryphon ~ Cleopatra IV parents were uncle and niece ~ Cleopatra IV had with her husband and brother Ptolemy IX Soter II = Ptolemy XII Neos Dionysos Philopator Philadelphos ~ he was famed Cleopatra's father; Maternal Grandmother ~ was Berenice III Cleopatra Philopator[famed Cleo's grandmom ~ mom's mom] she was the daughter of Ptolemy IX Soter II & Cleopatra Selene I and first cousin/sister to famed Cleo's father which I will explain in detail below ~ her parents were brother and sister amd their parents were Cleopatra III Euergetis and Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II Tryphon ~ (in other words Ptolemy IX, Cleopatra IV and Cleopatra Selene I were all siblings) ~ Berenice III Cleopatra Philopator had with her husband and uncle Ptolemy X Alexander I Philometor ~ who was also the son of Cleopatra III Euergetis and Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II Tryphon = Cleopatra V Tryphaena ~ she was famed Cleopatra's mother. Yes for those who have noticed famed Cleopatra's paternal and maternal grandfather is one and the same, he had children with both his sisters: one gave birth to Cleo's father, Ptolemy XII Neos Dionysos Philopator Philadelphos, and the other gave birth to Cleo's maternal grandmother, Berenice III; Cleo's maternal grandmother, Berenice, married her uncle(Bernice's father and mother's other brother, Ptolemy X Alexander); from that union they had Cleo's mother, Cleopatra V Tryphaena; Cleo's mother, Cleopatra V, then married Cleo's father, Ptolemy XII, who also happened to be Cleopatra V's uncle/cousin.

Hope that explains it some, because they married each other the Ptolemaic Family Branch can be confusing if one does not study it in detail.

reply

[deleted]

But maybe you could once again supplement your data with links to hot Greek chicks. Of all your posts those are by far my favorites. Yeah baby! :)


For you, knvobrien my friend, anything...I'll do even one better and post them live.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlUPU5jq_uM&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTut-JxFb48&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCQCgf5Un0c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85tY6ELX0H0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYFqCPdPc3M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYtZiJdhQqk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgkG-IXBfaY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imB1CalGPqk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvCF6GC2MwE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5RBCAdZpeQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ma-bEbHJk4E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuK_I-WpTVU

More to come when I have more time.

reply

[deleted]

I don't know how I missed your post, knvobrien, but you are welcome.

reply

[deleted]