-Hamlet-'s modern days vs -Romeo+Juliet-'s modern days
It's easy to compare this modernization of HAMLET to Baz's modernization of ROMEO + JULIET, for all the obvious reasons (some reasons being- the original Shakespearean text, the modernization etc.).
Both versions can be praised and criticized for many different motives, yet I wanted to address the fact that the adaptation of HAMLET to this particular scenario just doesn't work.
While ROMEO+JULIET is a tragedy about two people of opposing families that fall in love, and notwithstanding that their tragedy affects not only them, but the families too, HAMLET's modern life adaptation is not as simple.
When you adapt a love such as Romeo and Juliet's, there is no real need to be overly carefull with the specific setting etc. It's a universal and timeless kind of love, that could happen anywhere, and not just in the setting of the original play.
But HAMLET, as well as being a play about personal anguish, melanchoky, lack of strength to act on something, etc., is also a play about how for Kings and Princes, decision making is not the same. When a King makes a wrong choice, the whole kingdom suffers.
Now, when you adapt that from a Danish kingdom to a New York corporation... you just loose half of the play's impact.
I have nothing against this kind of adaptations, I think there are adaptations that try to be more loyal to the original and fail a lot more alarmingly, but to me it's a real shame that this particular issue was not taken into account.
If you agree, disagree, have any more views to share about this modernization, or Shakespeare modernizations in general please speak up, I'd be very interested in hearing more thoughts on this!