Dane Cook
Dane Cook was the only good part of the movie he is hysterical
share[deleted]
He ain't so great. There's funnier people that deserve much more exposure.
-Andy-
[deleted]
Jerome Pradon (Ashton) was the best by far
this face, the infection which poisons our love
lol i wanna see it even though i heard bad reviewss
and how much of dane is in it anyway?
Dane ... and his bad Jim Carry impression.
I felt sorry for Dane back then. Now he's got his act together.
he´s so annoying in this movie
shareI agree, Jerome Pradon (Ashton) was the best of all the actors. Dane Cook reminded me of a friend in the school cafeteria trying to do a Jim Carrey impersonation. Badly but with a lot of enthusiasm.
>O Stands For Osom (awesome) ~ New York<
There's nothing good about Dane Cook. He isn't funny in stand-up or when in a movie, he cannot act, and he's not very entertaining even on a "so bad it's good" scale.
The only good thing he did for this movie is completing the Crap-Cycle. Had he been anyone else this movie may have risked having something good in it. With Cook... it's terrible all around, and that's consistency. Gotta give them credit for that.
He sucked, and he wasn't funny then, and isn't funny now.
shareIf you honestly felt Dane Cook was hysterical then you have the sense of humor of a 6 year old. I feel like the movie could have at least been one of those bad but watchable action movies had it not been for Dane Cook. He is so unfunny and annoying it hurts. This is who Dane Cook was back then and still is. The only difference between Dane Cook back then and when he became big was back then he had the dark short hair with the long sideburns and used to wear a black tanktop and jeans on stage to do his act. He realized that wasn't working so he grew his hair out, put in some highlights, found some trendy clothes and then people thought he was hilarious. His act is still the same, just screaming jokes and trying to rely on a lot of movement but he had different results because he dressed more trendy.
share