She really grew up a LOT between the filming of this and when That 70's Show started. They both came out in 1998, I wonder how much time passed between the two?
shareBased on some of the postmarks on letters in the movie, it was 1993.....or 5-6 years before.
shareMilo was released March 1998.
Mila Kunis Birthday is August 1983, which would make her 14 at the time of the release...and probably 13/14 during filming, since they filmed a large portion in school it would have easier to film during the summer when it was closed.
That 70's Show premiered in August 1998, with Mila just turning 15. I remember her making a statement about how awkward she felt on the show because she was the only one who as the same age as her character, Ashton Kutcher was 20 at the time...which is probably why they prolonged the Kelso & Jackie's first time until she was of age to film those PG scenes closer to her 18th birthday.
A lot of changes can happen to a body during puberty in a 1-2 year period between filming.
I know I started puberty at 12, and by the time I was 16...waiters at restaurants thought I was 21 and kept rattling off the daily alcohol beverage specials assuming I was of age.
I don't think "Milo" was filmed in 1998. It seems that it was filmed a few years before, but for some reason, it couldn't be released right away. Mila Kunis looks like a little girl (maybe a preadolescent) in "Milo" and in "That 70s Show" she looks way older, like a different person.
"I really felt quite distressed at not receiving an invitation" - Maleficent
I spotted her right away! I was like no way she would be in a low-budget movie like this, but boy was I wrong. I guess you have to start some wheres!
shareShe was also in the first remake to Piranha, which was also a low-budget horror movie. She had a bigger role in that and that was filmed right around the same time as Milo, maybe even before.
share