CONFUSED


In the climatic scene when the villagers are at Ned's funeral and the lottery fellow is driving toward the village with the check, what is the purpose of the helicpter? I found it very distracting.

Thanks for any responses.

reply

The helicopter was the method the lotto man traveled from Dublin to Tullymore. Showing it was an indicatino that he was on his way ... and at a very inopportune time! With everyone in the church, toasting Ned, the lotto man was sure to catch on to their scam ... in other words, the helicopter was used to build suspense for a possible ruin of the villagers' plan.

reply

But as I recall, the helicopter was shown alternately with the lotto man's car. I still have the tape and am going to re-view that part. Back later.

In the meanttime, thanks for taking the time to respond.

reply

I don't think the shots between the helicopter and the Lotto man in his car alternate. I've only seen the film once, but as I recall, first you see him coming by helicopter, and then the suspense builds even more as he's shown in his car, driving toward the village. Those shots are intercut with shots of the people in the church, and we in the audience realize the Lotto man is getting closer and closer to the church . . . as another poster put it, threatening to bring an end to the villagers' plan.

reply

hello -
whatever the individual interpretation of this scene, this was a truly enjoyable movie.

thank you for your response.
pamela

reply

You're confused about that? Try going to the movie title page and looking at the if you like this, try these recommendations! Smokin Aces?!?! WTF?




- The Don

reply

Wow, I just bumped a really old thread. Hahaha! Sorry.

- The Don

reply

Yes you did. Tsk, tsk.

reply

I'm confused about the start of the movie. The guy watching tv wasn't the winner?????? How did he get the numbers?

The loser is always at fault.

reply

He called out each number after it appeared on the TV, to fool his wife into bringing him the dessert.

reply

Come to think of it what difference does it make if Ned's dead? They just need the ticket. Right?

The loser is always at fault.

reply

It has been a while since I saw this film and I do not recall if there was a reason why Ned had to redeem the ticket. So - you make a good point if indeed there was no reason.

reply

Ned had signed it on the back. Therefore he has to redeem it.

reply

thanks for clearing this up. I really want to see this film again.

reply

Hi. We got this DVD a few days ago and watched it yesterday. I'll try and help your confusion:

1) The lotto man arrives from Dublin by helicopter and is met on the road into the village by a smartly dressed woman who asks to be dropped off. I'm guessing it was a car hire firm. Similarly, when the funeral is taking place we are shown the helicopter so he must have been on his way again. We are not shown the bit where he gets the car.

2) Ned had signed the ticket so Michael had to pretend to be Ned.

3) The two people mentioned at the end in the dedication: I noticed one of them was the "Key Grip", the other name I didn't spot amongst the credits.

Lovely, gentle comedy. If you like this, try "Keeping Mum" with Rowan Atkinson.

"Good evening Dave. Everything's running smoothly, and you?"

reply

Thank you for taking the time to explain this. I have put the film on my Netflix list so I can watch it again. And I will certainly add "Keeping Mum."

reply

That lottery commission has a rule that they must verify that the person who claims the win is the one who bought the ticket, to prevent rewarding a thief.

If the winner is dead, the money would normally go to his legal heirs. But Ned had no will and no known relatives, so if the lottery commission knew Ned was dead, the money would have been unclaimed.

reply

The young boy would have had Ned's DNA, and so as the only surviving relative of the winner he would have inherited the entire £6.8 million........it would not have remained unclaimed

reply

I said that Ned had no known relatives because Maggie, the boy’s mother, was concealing the paternity so that Finn would think that Finn was the father. Maggie thought it was more important that the boy have a happy father figure than have all the money.

I agree that Maggie might have revealed the paternity if, otherwise, the money would have been unclaimed.

reply

A very funny movie with interesting people. However at the end, I watch credits for some unknown reason.

It was dedicated to two individuals and the phrase the men toasted with at the end of the movie was the same as the dedication. "to whom we will be indebted forever".

Does anyone know what that is about? I couldn't find it anywhere on IMDB. It almost seems that the writer took a true story and re-wrote it to make it more interesting for the screen.

Does anyone know anything about the dedication?

reply

Probably a couple of very close friends or family members of the filmmaker(s). Somebody in this thread noted that one of the names matched the "Key Grip" of the crew (head electrician basically). So maybe he died before the film finished post-production.

No matter what, it was a sweet and befitting gesture to make for the two missed people.

reply

true. even though ned's signature was on the ticket. it could be easily forged.

reply

[deleted]

The helicopter is to get to the island where a car meets him as in the scene where Jackie and Michael were at the beach.

reply

I think part of it was to show how remote their village was from the rest of the world. The guy had to take a helicopter and a car every time he came to visit.

reply

Exactly.

reply