MovieChat Forums > The Sum of All Fears (2002) Discussion > Were more nuke scenes left on the cuttin...

Were more nuke scenes left on the cutting room floor due to 9/11?


I've watched the movie a few times (local cable plays it a lot, usually when I'm on the couch and the remote's out of reach haha) and it feels like there are bits missing from when the nuke goes off. There's just that one hospital explosion and then the shockwave. You'd think they'd have a shot of the stadium disappearing into a blinding ball of light or something, or a mushroom cloud in the middle of downtown or something. Did they have any extra shots like that but were left on the cutting room floor because they didn't want people to be reminded of 9/11?

reply

There was only ever one detonation.

They did make changes due to 9/11
Hollywood liberals didn't want to offend the animals that just attacked us on 9/11
so they altered who the enemy was from Muslim Jihadi terrorists to German Neo-Nazis.
In the Book they were Palestinian terrorists.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

In the Book they were Palestinian terrorists.


And if I recall (even more ironically) the Pali Terr got his head 'officially' lopped off by a Saudi with a big old scimitar.

reply

Didn't they also change it from terrorists to neo-Nazis before 9/11 'so not to offend anyone'?

reply

It's always amusing when you get a claim like this of liberal bias. The plotline actually makes more sense in the movie than in the book.

BTW ... there was actually a shot of the mushroom cloud over the city and a shot of the stadium just after the detonation. So complain to the editors if you want more close up and personal death and desctruction.

reply

"CGSailor" is completely wrong...

"They did make changes due to 9/11
Hollywood liberals didn't want to offend the animals that just attacked us on 9/11"

FALSE. The film was completed THREE MONTHS before 9/11. When scripting the film, the filmmakers decide the change from Arab terrorists to Neo-nazis because they felt Arab terrorists were cliché and having them pull off the attack would be unrealistic (which proved tragically ironic). Concurrently, there was a growing fear of neo-nazism in Europe at the time, with fascist parties gaining a lot of power in numerous countries, including Austria, Holland, Spain, France, Italy,...

As for your initial question, roximunro, it's called "style". Showing "a shot of the stadium disappearing into a blinding ball of light or something, or a mushroom cloud in the middle of downtown or something" would have been the obvious choice and no doubt a lesser director would have done just that. But what Robinson did was, IMO, incredible and just much more effective. Sudden, unexpected, destructive and done in an instant. Conveying the destruction and the horror of the siutation very simply and tastefully, without overdoing it. One of the best sequences in the film and that's saying something.

Drop it like it's legal precedent!

reply

Just for clarification. Holland is NOT a country. Holland is a part of The Netherlands; not the other way around.

reply

Whike technically, Holland is a specific oart of the Netherlands....
The name Holland IS ALSO USED IN A LARGER SENSE to refer to the whole country, especially in other countries.

This is the sense that the other poster was using Holland.

So he isn't "Wrong" just not fully accurate.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

I think the short answer is that they wanted to maintain the feel of a thriller, rather than turn the movie into a disaster flick. I personally feel it was a good choice not to dwell too much on the results of the nuclear blast. As one of the above posters notes, it was more likely a matter of directorial style.🐭

reply

I was wondering about this too. It just finished playing on AMC and there was an aerial shot of the city shown briefly just before the blast. For some reason I thought that the explosion was shown from that angle just before they cut to the hospital scene where the windows are blown in. It's very possible that there was never a bomb explosion shot from the air and I'm completely crazy! However, I'd be interested to see if anyone else remembers something similar. Films are often edited before being shown on TV for various reasons (violence, language, time etc), perhaps Sum Of All Fears has a television version as well.

As far as an edit being done due to 9/11, I think that would be very possible. I've never thought about that before, but it would make sense.

reply

It's very odd how they handle the nuke in the film. It goes off, pretty explosion, some random shots of debris and rubble and that's really the only sense you get of anything having happened at all. Millions of people just incinerated? You'd never guess.

"I said no camels, that's five camels, can't you count?"

reply

I don't think the death toll was in the millions. According to Wikipedia, the population of Baltimore in 2010 was 620,000 approx. In the pre-9/11 era, in which the film was set, it was probably lower than that. Furthermore, the bomb wouldn't necessarily have vaporized all of the city.

reply

the explosion was scaled down for ratings reasons

reply

[deleted]