MovieChat Forums > Shaft (2000) Discussion > Peoples's fear of the wealthy

Peoples's fear of the wealthy



Just posted something similar to this on the "It Could Happen To You" board, re: people harassing lottery winners but not corporate CEOs who make more in a year than any dozen lottery winners.

I saw this film less than a decade after the L.A. riots, when I was living frugally enough to rent in Crenshaw, just blocks away from what happened to Reginald Denny. The scene between Peoples and Wade struck me then and sticks with me now for that reason.

This is only my theory, which I reached during the riots, but does anyone else think there's an almost religious deference given to the super-wealthy in the U.S.A.?

This difference is of course often characterized as a "class divide," but I think it goes deeper than that.

During the riots, the rioters trashed all the supermarkets, auto parts stores and, eventually, fast food joints (the fast food joints were left alone for the first few days - I guess they thought they might get hungry). They did this in their own and all adjacent neighborhoods.

Then, they worked their way all the way up to Hollywood, where they looted Frederick's and various stores (but oddly left the magic store untouched - I guess there were no nerds among them) before trying unsuccessfully to set those buildings ablaze.

They hit Koreatown pretty hard along the way, except that the Korean grocers started shooting back (almost all of them are ex-Korean-army).

But, and here's the part that really struck me, THEY LEFT BEVERLY HILLS UNTOUCHED. They marched right past Rodeo Drive and the Beverly Center (someone cracked a window, that's all). PRIME LOOTING, and they left it all alone!

My theory: at some gut level, the lower and middle class view those places as "holy ground," where they feel SO unwelcome and out of place that they cannot even bring themselves to LOOT there.

Again, it's just a theory, but it explains so much in my view.

It suggests to me that, in the eyes of most "normal citizens," super-rich people live mysterious lives. Really, what the heck does ANYONE need with $10million PER YEAR? People don't ask that question, because they assume the "ways of the wealthy" are inscrutable and forever beyond them.

Luckily, people are starting to question it at last.

reply

[deleted]

Come on, the looters were not dumb enough to attack places like beverly hills... because they knew the moment they set foot there hell would break loose with the police REALLY kicking some arses and possible even the military.

"Dadinho é o CARALHO! Meu nome agora é Zé Pequeno PORRA!"

reply

@tuimjedi speak on it bro

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

as a black man i agree w/ you

reply

[deleted]

let me hip you to something i also learned during the riots. there is 1 cop to every 10 citizens living in beverly hills

there is 1 cop to every 23,000 citizens in south central LA. you do the math

reply

At some point, the rioters don't consist of politically motivated people, it's not anymore about suppression of minorities or whatever, it's all down to pure hate of everything and the will to wreak havoc. The more intelligent or lets say thoughtful persons leave the riots because it doesn't server their purpose anymore while more and more criminals, lunatics, people with anger issues and whatnot join the riot. Finally, for a short period of time, they can release their anger, steal, smash things ... it's like hooligans in europe that start fights and street battles after football (soccer) games, whether their team won of lost, it doesn't matter, it's not about football, it's about primordial urges.

So, at that point of the LA riots when they did their march it wasn't about poor vs rich anymore. Why did they leave Beverly Hills untouched? You said it yourself: When the koreans fought back, they left them alone. The rioters just picked on the easiest victims and Beverly Hills certainly is one of the toughest. Not only because of the better police coverage, also because of private security agencies, better protected houses, watchdogs and whatnot.

reply

My theory: at some gut level, the lower and middle class view those places as "holy ground," where they feel SO unwelcome and out of place that they cannot even bring themselves to LOOT there.


Interesting theory but I have to disagree. I was unemployed at the time of the riots and living with my parents in Van Nuys, watching the proceedings on TV with great interest. From what I recall the LAPD were not prepared for this. The National Guard came late because of a screw up with not having live ammo or some such nonsense so they couldn't come down right away. The police did not do as much as they could have for the first couple of days. Then, when the rioters approached the "westside" of LA - they seemed to swing into gear. Yeah, call it racist, call it what you like. I remember clearly that once the upper classes were about to be affected suddenly the cops got their cajones back.

At least that's the way I remember it.

reply

To protect and serve...protect the rich and serve the powerful.

reply

Ever consider that the looters just ran out of steam? Quit assuming everyone shares your Marxist class warfare hangups.

reply

Your right, and that's how the country was designed. It's not Marxist, it's reality. I wouldn't change anything--but I'm going to live in some freakzoid delusion because I'm too weak mentally to think for myself.

reply

I think its more a fear of injustice this movie is getting at, unfortunately wealth can buy "innocence"


I am the son of a man named Tom.

reply