The minute I saw Pontifex, I thought, "Clint Howard did it!" He first appears in a short scene, trying to fool us, meaning that Pontifex is just another guy in the series of guys Hume and Farve interview, but when we have some mystery man reveal, of course it's Clint Howard. (By the way, Pontifex... Is that a Talaxian name? Remember Neelix?)
But it turns out his motives were good, while I was expecting the kind of story in which he would have kidnapped the child for selfish reasons, maybe because his kid died and he and his wife couldn't adopt, or something. But no, he wanted to help the couple reach the Territories. (Just where the heck are these Territories anyway?)
I have an observation about the show, something I'm starting to realize now. This is the kind of show I enjoyed very much back in the 1980s and 1990s, but not so much today, when I tend to prefer serialized stories. But TR 2070 bears the storytelling identity we'd expect in the last couple of decades of the last century.
This is deceptive, because in the aspects of setting and atmosphere, it looks like a much more recent show. Oh, well, perhaps if CBS produced it now, it would be a procedural like this (minus the nudity). (Come to think of it, in many ways this reminds me of the also cancelled show Almost Human (2013), minus the banter between partners. Almost Human was the kind of show that brought up interesting points, but, unfortunately, favored the procedural aspect much more.)
When analyzing the episode of an old series, we may get tempted to observe it under the criteria we'd expect to find today. So, we see lots of topics that would have been explored in more detailed by modern serialized shows, like a society in which genetic screening determines who will become a part of it, Gattaca (1997) style (well, a 1990s show after all), genetic mutations caused by alterations in the environment, the government screening its citizens in order to get more compliant citizens. That, indeed, would be a terrible and controversial thing to happen, and it could be easily misused.
Instead, the show uses all these enticing ingredients just as an appetizer to set the background for a "human interest" story in which family and, if not adoptive, but adoptable children this time are featured. OK, David and Olivia begin to question the validity of the show thing, but his questions are more like rhetorical ones, since no real debate, with no real consequences occur.
But yeah, sure disruptive behavior has a lot to do with leadership. No wonder it was Evil Captain Kirk the one with the ability to lead. And based on the baby's father's records, he was more prone to take part in protest manifestations than commiting any real crime, which makes me think the government may treat political dissidents as badly as bank robbers, perhaps worse. THAT would be something I'd like to see. Oh, well, again, I must remind myself not to judge this show based on new shows.
And to think that, last week, I wondered if there were ever any kids in this show. OK, my question about the absence of children has been answered, and I hope they don't reward us with a third episode about children next week.
OK, "Baby Lottery" gets how many points? Let's find out. Let's roll the raffle drum! Rolling... Rolling... Rolling... And this time your lottery prize is... 6 (Six) 1999 71-year old Ford Taurus SHO (for Showtime) sedans!
reply
share