MovieChat Forums > Shurayukihime (1974) Discussion > Shurayukihime vs. Kill Bill

Shurayukihime vs. Kill Bill


I personally don't think Kill Bill was a rip-off, but an improvement of Shurayukihime. I think Kill Bill is better, because you get to learn more about the characters, even the bad guys, and I think Tarantino is an excellent screenplay-writer, whereas in Shurayukihime the dialogues were average at the most. The story was excellent, though, that's why Tarantino used this as an inspiration for his Kill Bill vol. 1 & 2.
I loved Shurayukihime, and Tarantino picked out all the great parts and put them in his own movie. In my opinion that's not ripping, but more like honouring.

reply

It's not so much the plot elements of the film
that got "ripped-off", but rather, Tarantino's
choice to create a likeness between O-Ren Ishi
and Yuki. In addition, there are certain scene
locations and camera angles that are mimicked
quite frequently in the Kill Bill volumes.

But when it comes right down to it, Tarantino
was just paying his respects to a classic film.

He wasn't trying to pass-off the ideas as being
his own; otherwise he wouldn't have paid hommage
to the Shaw Brothers intro, or mentioned Shogun
Assassin (though, you think a more hardcore fan
would have reference Lone Wold & Cub instead)

To say that he "ripped-off" the Snowblood is overreacting.

reply

I'm thinking that he used the Shogun Assassin title instead of Lone Wolf and Cub because of his friendship with the Wu Tang Clan. RZA used a sample from it on one of their early albums. "His brain was infected by devils ..." I think it was the 36 chambers album but it could have been liquid swords. It's been awhile since I listened to either.

reply

it's GZA's liquid swords

reply

Not at all. Tarrantino has yet to do a film of his own with a totally original plotline, and "homage" is just a gentlemanly way of saying "rip-off" in cases like these. I really hated Kill Bill One and I saw if AFTER the second one. He has to make a film that is his own and just gives a nod to the types of films he loved when growing up before he convinces me he is anything more than a maker of pastiches. I think his last great film was "Jackie Brown." With a script version of the book "Rum Punch" by the great Elmore Leonard, it had just the right touch of 70s blaxplotiation and intelligent dialogue to make it real. I really loved the Lady Snowblood pictures as much for their Japanese history lesson as anything else.

reply

"Tarrantino has yet to do a film of his own with a totally original plotline, and "homage" is just a gentlemanly way of saying "rip-off" in cases like these."

Or is "rip-off" the haters way of saying "homage"?

reply

I think the differences between Homage and Rip-Off comes down to the motivation.
Tarantino is such a fan, he wants to essentially re-create what he loves and share it with a whole new audience. A rip-off artist usually has no affinity for what he's ripping off. He sees that it has market potential, and without tact, style, or affection for the material, he reproduces it quickly and shamelessly. The Asylum mockbusters are generally perfect examples of rip-offs. Kill Bill is definitely an homage.

reply

Lady Snowblood >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kill bill

reply

For my money, I have to geaux with Lady Snowblood because it's less popular than the Kill Bill. Less people liking it and mucking it all up for the rest of us.

reply

Kill Bill is the best but it has all of the advantages being new and basically using every trick Lady Snowblood uses. Lady Snowblood is amazing though. Great for its time and still great now.

I'm quietly judging you.

reply

As much as I love Kill Bill, I give this more credit for being the "original" while Tarantino pays homage to many "asian classics" (notably Bruce Lee series) in his movie (with great style!). This one gets a sure 10 out of 10.

reply

I have to geaux with Lady Snowblood

Heh. Never thought I'd see another Louisiana native on IMDB.

I like both equally. They're almost entirely different films.

L.S. is a dark samurai film that moves at a fairly slow pace.
Kill Bill is a fast-paced action film that moves at a music-video level pace and doesn't take itself seriously.

The only thing they have in common is bloodspray.

reply

So you judge movies based on how unique and special they make you feel for liking them? If a movie is good, how does more people liking it "muck it up" for you in any way?

reply

I loved both Lady Snowblood and Kill Bill equally, personally.

reply

I find it amazing that so many rip-offs use the word "homage" as though that word makes it all right. Tarrantino had run out of ideas and does these "homages" routinely now and no amount of inside film jokes, TV references and the like will make it anything more. "Jackie Brown" as far as I am concerned is the last original thing Tarrantino did. After doing his "Elmore Leonard" turn, he is just recycling.

reply

[deleted]

There's certainly a lot of similar elements in Kill Bill. Off the top of my head he used:

1) The music
2) The shot when her mother kills the first guy
3) The battle in the courtyard against the precursors of the crazy 88
4) The death scene outside in the snow
5) The plot segment where she kills the parent of the sympathetic daughter
6) The over-the-top violence (chopping off limbs/exaggerated arterial spray)

The thing is, he puts it all to much better use than the original. Of course that's not saying much as the original had horrible editing, crap dialogue, and a volatile plot (ranging from excellent to sub-par).

reply

Lady Snowblood by far. Tarantino is an excellent editor with fine style, but this earns much more credit for actually being the original. I also just enjoy the fact that this movie is quite beautifully done for its time and resources. True, it's not sleek and glossy like Kill Bill, but I enjoy it more. Plus, Meiko Kaji is just lovely. One of the first great film female badasses.

I'm not wise, just uniquely stupid.

reply

Horrible editing? Crap dialogue? Where?

Volatile plot- A plot that is readily vaporizable at a relatively low temperature?

reply

I own Lady Snowblood and enjoy it lots but I have to go with 'Kill Bill' a million times over. As much as I doubt that 'Kill Bill' would ever have materialised (at least in the form that it did) had this film not been made, I think, as someone else put it, QT improves on the many things he nicked from here. One of my main points would be the fight scenes. In Lady Snowblood, there isn't a fraction of the choreography of the ones in KB, almost all of them a few flicks of a sword and then the iconic blood splaying. I think the fight scenes in KB are some of the most entertaining around.
Also as much as some of the fantastic shots in LSB are stolen, they are used to much better effect in KB. He stole the shot of the four gang members stood over LSB's Mother but when done in KB it looked for more threatening.
Plus people forget that there are so many elements in KB which don't come from LSB. The scene with Buck in the hospital room, the fantastic dialogue, the varied enemy characters and the use of the music. Even the title song is used in KB to much better effect. I really like LSB and I acknowledge aspects such as the time it came out and budget, personally KB will always win for me.

reply

tarantino is unoriginal, creating from his own influences

reply

"tarantino is unoriginal, creating from his own influences "

Everybody creates from their own influences. That's how inspiration works.

reply


I was born in the 70's so I'd probably would of never have ended up watching this movie if not for Tarantino. I really enjoyed both movies. There will always be a debate about Tarantino as a director,screenplay, writer, but either way Kill Bill was a great movie I'm sure it'll be considered a classic if not already. Though you could say he "ripped off" or paid homage to LS I think he did a fantastic job, I can't imagine anyone else doing that and making it their own.

reply

I like QT, but thought Kill Bill was awful. Way too over the top and not in a good way. I like Lady Snowblood though.

reply

Kill Bill was really awful. Comparing Kill Bill to anything truly Japanese is like comparing a commercial of apple juice to a real apple. So after reading so many comments comparing Kill Bill to this movie I'm really hesitating whether I should waste time with it.

reply

Ther both great tarintino is the man and LSB and KB kik ass!!

I'm not a lady I'm an anthropologist

reply

Kill Bill Vol 1 was one of the worst movies I've ever seen, but I really enjoyed Vol 2, a much more coherent film. Tarantino is an idiot that basically takes scenes and ideas from movies he watched over the years (usually bad ones) and tries to be clever by putting them together and trying to pass it off as his own. Of course over the years other director's have been influenced by their predecessors' works, but they don't directly rip them off the way this hack does. The difference between homage and plagiarism is in the acknowledgement. It's time for people to stop being duped by this guy already. A long drawn out conversation about what they call certain burgers in France or madonna songs is not genius, by any stretch of the imagination.
Now that I got that off my chest, Lady Snowblood was far superior:)

reply

"The difference between homage and plagiarism is in the acknowledgement."

So should Tarantino annotate his film with works cited entries? How do other directors acknowledge their influences?

The fact that we even notice these parallels should suggest that he's paying homage. If Tarantino really felt as if he was doing something underhanded, why would he be so obvious? He could clearly mask these specific set pieces far more effectively.

This is actually a pretty common postmodern practice. Leone did it as well in "Once Upon a Time in the West." Almost every director in the Fench New Wave did this too. (Both influences on Tarantino.) What I think you need to remember is that his films (as with Leone and the French New Wave) are, more than anything, movies about movies: They use movies within their movies to get whatever specific points or purposes across.

It shouldn't be Tarantino's responsibility to "subtitle" his films with annotations. It is up to us as discerning viewers to spot them.

reply

Are you saying that anything that's not Japanese is inferior? Talk about nationalism!

I thought Kill Bill Volume 1 was extremely entertaining (my rating: 8/10). Volume 2 was too slow for my taste, though (my rating: 5/10).

reply

I love both films but I must say this.

If not for Kill Bill I would never have even heard of this film.
I just watched it for the first time and I'm so glad I looked into it.

So, when people bash Kill Bill for '...being a rip off' or something like that I know better. It was a sign post that guided me in the direction of this real cool movie.
:)

I can't wait to share this film with my friends.

reply

I dont consider myself to be a QT Fan. I didnt particularly like Kill Bill I or II. I LIKED reservoir dogs and pulp fiction because it was good writing (as far as violent crime movies go-- I think the name 'pulp fiction' pretty much says, "chalk this up as cheap entertainment"). As far as direction goes, hes nothin great ("OMFG! a perspective camera shot from the trunk of a car? Thats... Thats... .... pretty much all hes got"). I see him as a MUCH more driven movie fan, than I do a director. That explains his compulsive "borrowing"-- theres a HELL of a lot of it in ALL his movies. I'll be surprised if there ever comes a day I see a QT movie that doesnt look at least a LITTLE familiar, haha...

Just saw LSB today. It was good. The camera work wasnt bad like everyone says. It had some style even. I think the fact that it doesnt fall into the "blinding speed editing of non-stop action!" made it that much more dynamic than Kill Bill-- I need to see some "slow" before I can appreciate the "fast".

(Also, I dont see how in the world Tarantino based his arterial effects from this movie at ALL! I was expecting RIDICULOUS amounts of blood, and I would have been disappointed too, except that it looked really good! Blood color pardoned, because nobody got that right till the mid to late 80's anyways...)

A couple people here have said that they thought the characters in Kill Bill were more developed than Shurayukihime. I'm on the fence for this one. Lady Snow Blood had more character, in a "I know where shes coming from" sort of way (Think about Kobue Takemura, throwing her baskets into the sea, so her father wouldnt know they were broke). Kill Bill had more character, but in a "I know what these characters are like" sort of way-- a "I know the Bride is a scared of no one, tough as nails, kick-ass bitch!" sort of way. It all depends on which sort of movie you like best. Personally, I like the LSB way. I dont think you need to cram things down the viewer's throat... we're not as dumb as they like to think.



As far as the two stories go (and somewhere near here, there be spoilers... watch out now!), I have to give the win to Shurayukihime-- and not just because I appreciate old stuff (I try to keep that in check).

In Kill Bill, we all pretty much knew The Bride was going to "Kill Bill". We didnt know EXACTLEY why she got betrayed. We didnt know HOW he was going to "Kill Bill"-- but I think every person in the theatre knew that her baby wasnt REALLY dead!

For those reasons, I label this the "pulp fiction" or kung-fu, or samurai, or japanese cinema, or whatever you wanna refer to it as. I always call them "Bad Kung-Fu Movies" (not based on the actual quality of the movie... its just how I refer to them.). Kill Bill was funny at times. Cool most of the time. and bloody ALL the time. When the movie was over, I didnt care where the Bride went. The blood had stopped spraying, and Bill was dead.

Depth of story wasnt an issue-- I think the fact that QT regularly wrote new scenes and added them to the script says something about the foundations of the screenplay.



In my opinion, Shurayukihime accomplished more by its use of simplicity. It didnt try to be clever with it's cinematography. It conveyed exactley what it needed to, and it wasnt BORING to look at-- There are two moments in the movie that I love, both using the same camera move. The camera is focused on Yuki, then it zooms in and over her shoulder... both times I was like, "What the hell...?? What are they getting at?" just as they rack the camera's focus and dissolve to another scene. Theres something to be said for an almost cliche move.

The bottom line is this. Shurayutihime didnt have great dialogue-- and the action wasnt as compact or shot as well. That I will concede. However, I lay my case at the feet of the viewers. There was little to no point to Kill Bill aside from exploitation of violent movies-- which is great. Its fun to watch, if you've got time to burn.

But I'd trade 50 of those movies for two classic scenes from this movie that struck a chord with me:

When Yuki discovers the woman (cant recall the name) has hung herself rather than be murdered (dont tell me you didnt get chills when she stared at you hanging there), she realizes that 20 years of preparation has been stolen from her. That she has failed at her life's ambition. She gets worked up and in a fit of rage breaks all her training, and splits the corpse in half (although the effect was so crumby, it can break the serious mood if you let it).

We see what happens when Yuki fails. They didnt cram it down our throats, but the message is recieved. I started to wonder what would happen when she succeeds? I never ONCE wondered what would happen at the end of Kill Bill... just didnt care enough.

So later on, when we see Yuki complete her task, and she is walking through the snow bleeding, we see what happens when she succeeds. She permits a bitter Kobue to stab her in the side. Like,"Yeah, go ahead. I'm done here anyway...".

Then when we think she has died (that scream was heartbreaking!), the sun rises, and she picks her face out of the snow. Its like, "OH! I GET IT!". Now that Yuki has fullfilled her Mother's wish she can move to her own life. The sun rise purged her, of her Mother's spirit. The movie had a point aside from blood, great!




The only thing I can think to compare that moment to is (and I'm ashamed to be bringing up a trendy director, because it almost goes against my point) in "The Darjeeling Limited. When the brother's all throw their father's luggage to the ground to catch their train. One of them even says, "Dad's baggage isnt going to make it...". After that, they are okay as brothers again.


I hate when people say they love movies, but then miss the only TRUELY important message in the movie. Its disappointing.


Go see Shurayukihime, The Darjeeling Limited, and if your in the mood for a Lark, Why not rent Kill Bill I & II. At the very least its a good collection of 'head nods' to movie history.

~TW

reply

I would say that 'Lady Snowblood' is superior.

"Computer! Take me to the weasels!"

reply

Well, there will always be people who say '...this is better because it's older.'

Randy Rhodes is a superior guitarist to George Harrison.
But there will always be people who say 'While My Guitar Gently Weeps' blows away anything Rhodes did. And that's fine. But on a technical level Rhodes smokes him up, down and sideways. Not everybody can play like Segovia and pull it off. Rhodes could.

My point is that just because a thing is older doesn't mean it's better.

I happen to enjoy both films and if I had to, I'm sure I could find parts of LSB that I can say look boring or snobbish or trendy or whatever.

Either way, I'm glad that I can look at, listen to and enjoy both films without acting like a wanna be film critic.

It's not curing cancer... it's just entertainment.

reply