MovieChat Forums > Belly (1998) Discussion > This made no sense to me.. Help?

This made no sense to me.. Help?


It really confused me. Especially the minister part. So the feds wanted DMX to kill someone and this would keep him out of prison for life? It showed a white guy in the car with DMX talking about selling drugs, yet the guy he was gonna kill was black and yet he gave DMX a speech on how the world is scared of his thoughts and that the teens are polluted with drugs. And then we never know what the feds did to DMX because he didn't kill the minister. It just made absolutely no sense to me.

reply

I thought they said in the beginning when they first talked to DMX, something about drugs and the minister? ....but I believe maybe, they felt like the minister had too much powerto created a change, so they told DMX he sold drugs, (when he really didnt, at least I didnt see any thing in the movie) -kind of like the scenario w/ MJK-fear based hate ( people that have the power to truly make a change, seem to be assassinated. ( Malcolm x, MJK, JFK...goes on....) For whatever reason, the FBI wanted the minister dead and not for righteous reasons. I could be way off though !

reply

In the scene where the minister is driving with DMX at night, the minister is sitting there telling DMX about the bricks of cocaine he is importing! Also, the minister was white in that scene for some reason. Also, the FBI doesn't let a suspect just kill someone to get off free. It makes no sense!

reply

Wasnt that the FBI Agent that originally approached him?-He also called DMX "his ni**a"... The minister was light skinned black?

reply

It could have been. It was very dark in that scene. Regardless, it still makes no sense that the FBI would let someone kill somebody and then let them go free, especially someone as crazy as DMX.

reply

Made an account to reply to this...it's understandable to be confused, as the movie totally loses its way in the 2nd half, slips into ridiculous ideas the writer-director only had half-developed in the first place, and on top of that he has some important scenes where the dialogue is almost inaudible. ANYWAY, here's the deal...
The FBI agent/minister part, it's a lame attempt at representing a classic "conspiracy theory"...the minister is making the black community too strong by giving them hope and unity, whereas the "evil government" wants to keep them down with drugs and violence so they are easily controlled. A variation on the classic "the government invented crack, and released it into black neighborhoods to keep them controlled" conspiracy. Anyway, they want the minister killed so they can regain control and maintain the status quo, and they offer to wipe Tommy Bun's record clean if he'll do it.
Now, the reason they need TOMMY of all people to do this, is on even shakier ground than this ridiculous idea is in the first place. The FBI agent just says that they need a black guy to kill him, "For publicity"...which actually implies Tommy is supposed to get caught for doing this? But then I guess Feds help him disappear? Again, this part of the movie is not well thought out.

The minister is not dealing drugs or doing anything immoral...the FBI agent is the one driving in the car with Tommy, he doesn't meet the minister until the very end...but the FBI agent gives Tommy drugs to plant on the minister before he kills him, as "It's very important he's found with *beep* (drugs) on the premises". They're trying to set up an elaborate framing of an innocent man, for some reason using a random NYC thug...as someone (sort of) mentioned earlier in the thread, the whole conspiracy is supposed to be like a JFK thing. "Oh no, guys changing society too much, must kill him". Lemme know if you have any other questions, I've watched this movie ALOT, considering how ridiculous it is

reply

Great reply! It all makes sense to me now.

reply

I cant believe you needed this explained to you. lol

Reading your initial replies, you were way off.







Unless youre responding to me, dont hit reply to my post

I <3 Emily Blunt

reply

The FBI agent just says that they need a black guy to kill him, "For publicity"...which actually implies Tommy is supposed to get caught for doing this? But then I guess Feds help him disappear? Again, this part of the movie is not well thought out.

Not necessarily. I think they're meant for him to get killed publically or at least with a few witnesses to see that it was indeed a black man.

However I agree with your assessment. Plot is completely rediculous.






My Vote history: http://www.imdb.com/user/ur1914996/ratings

reply

[deleted]

Really nice job on explaining this plot section. I finally saw the movie last night for the first time and while there are many negatives, I enjoyed it. Compared to the majority of movies I see, it was a masterpiece.

You are 99% there in your explanation but I would like to make make one change: You say, "The FBI agent just says that they need a black guy to kill him, "For publicity"...which actually implies Tommy is supposed to get caught for doing this"

No, this isn't correct. the FBI agent (an uncredited Vincent Pastore -- who also played Phil Leotardo on the Sopranos) needs Buns because only a black man can get this close to the Minister this quickly. Remember, it's October when they meet on the basketball court so Buns has just two months to get into the Minister's inner circle before he gives his new year's day speech. That's not a lot of time to get close enough to the Minister -- and have a gun on your person to boot. Buns has no choice in the matter. Well, he does. He can spend his life in prison or go for this deal. Buns is supposed to cap the Minister then get out. the FBI will then relocate him and give him a new life. The FBI is now able to "keep the black man suppressed" as many black people think actually happens.

By the way, this is so far from reality. The FBI would and could never do this - despite what some inner city folks might think.

reply

Gotcha! Yeah I should've definitely included that, as that at least makes some remote sense. But there IS still a line (I'll try to find the exact quote and time) where he says, "We need a black guy to do it, for publicity"...or so I thought. Maybe he just meant it had to be someone from inside his organization, which, by definition, would be a black man.

reply

I have no idea what the entire movie was about.
The plot was silly, ridiculous, and made no sense.

reply

But god DAMN does it have style! A truly lovable b-movie, in my opinion.

reply

The idea was that the minister was too powerful for "white America" who like to keep "the brother down" and he could potentially get the black people on track...

If he could turn around a genuinly vicious bastard like DMX character than he could turn around anyone.

That's the idea, but I can understand you not understanding why... I've seen it about 10 times.



The plan is you drink a nice tall glass of shut the *beep* up.

reply

Yeah, I've actually seen it waaay too many times (for the type of movie it is) as well, haha. I got the whole 'He's uniting the up-til-now controllable minorities! We have to take him out!' plotline. What I was confused about was why they needed a black guy to do it, as I assumed DMX's character was supposed to get away with it. Having just re-watched it the other night, it is actually Nas' voice-over narration that makes the statement, while he's describing how DMX had to infiltrate the organization and started reading the book, he says "Apparently they needed a niggr to do it, for publicity, or some sheet." So, and I'm guessing here, I guess the idea was that DMX would assassinate him, then get 'caught', but that the corrupt government powers-that-be would help him disappear or something, but the public story would still be that a black man took him out, so it wouldn't appear racially motivated. Such a ridiculous plot turn lol

reply

Yeah that's what they meant to do, especially since DMX character was a known criminal so they wouldn't think that he'd be working with the cops like that.

But yeah it didn't really work and yeah woulda worked better in a 70's blaxplotation flick.

We don't have a dog. That was just some really violent sex.

reply