uncircumsized


notice that most of the guys there were uncircumsized :)

reply

Of course, that is how males are born.

reply

In Scandinavia only a few percent of the male population are circumsized. It's strictly for jews and (some) muslims.

reply

thanks guys for the bit of information. cheers!

reply

Not some but- all muslims

reply

Same in New Zealand where I live, that's the point I was making, circumcisions are only done for medical or religious reasons.

reply

"Circumcision of newborn males is a religious requirement of the Muslim and Jewish faiths, commonly, but not exclusively, performed on the eighth day after birth. It is also practiced by the majority of Americans, South Koreans and Filipinos."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumsision

"Define 'interesting'..." [deadpan] "Oh God, oh God, we're all going to die?"

reply

I suspect only a small proportion of the circumcisions performed in America would be for religious reasons.

reply

There's great irony in circumsizing for religious reasons; it's like saying: ' God was wrong when he created man.' XD

This chick Marla did NOT have testicular cancer.

reply

Damn' good point! I'm going to keep that in my "interesting quotes" text file!

reply

"thanks guys for the bit of information. cheers!"



i laughed my head off by this message!! thx.

reply

It seems that an excpetionally large part of the american people are circumsized, and some believe that this is because the first immigrants that came over from Europe saw America as "The promised land" and thought of circumsision as a "new covenant". Supposedly an idea that has been a part of american self-understanding throughout history. Americans are silly.

reply

i want my foreskin back ! i had no say in the matter.

reply

Interesting theory although when you consider how much plastic surgery goes on in America, it's hard not to come to the conclusion that they love unnecessary operations.

reply

notice that this isn't an American movie ;)

Go uncircumsized guys! :)

reply

There is nothing wrong (AT ALL) with going with the procedure! It does have it's advantages! And it does not diminish sensibility at all! So when people dye their hair, put on make up, and put on clothes....is that not also contradicting God's gift to us, having a body? Is that not saying we think God is not perfect??? Besides, many agree, circumcised looks better...but that is a personal opinion of many!
GO CIRCUMCICED BOYZZZ!!!

reply

I once read that many guys do it to make their hairy salami look bigger XD

If it ain't broke, don't fix it; same goes for weeners.

This chick Marla did NOT have testicular cancer.

reply

The thing is though, dying your hair, putting on make-up or clothes is not slicing off a part of your body! It's an operation that very seldom has any medical justification, so unless it is done for religious reasons then it is purely cosmetic/unnecessary.

As for the "personal opinion of many" comment: America has a high circumcision rate, but they are pretty much on their own here (again I'm talking about cosmetic reasons, not religious).
Now here's a thought: Where else does America ignore what the rest of the world is doing? Answer: The metric system.
Maybe they still do circumcisions because the length of our appendeges sounds bigger in centremetres! (see next comment)



The whole religious/cultural thing is another issue of course. Since I'm not religious, I'm of the opinion that religion itself does not justify slicing off a part of the body, but I know that religious people sure do take this whole religion thing seriously! I have to wonder why religions do circumcisions when human beings were supposed to have been made in God's image! But as I said, since I am not religious, someone else may enlighten me on this one.
It's interesting that female circumcision, which could be argued is a cultural/religious ritual is considered bad, ie cultural/religious reasons is not a justification for doing it, but male circumcision goes on for religious reasons.

reply

Actually it was just proven a week or so ago that circumcision does reduce the possibilities of getting and/or spreading aids/hiv along with other sexually transmitted diseases! A 25 year study in some American University just proved this, you should check it out guys, along with the other benefits it has, like hygene and reducing the risk of penile cancer and some other crazy bits out there in and around that area! So you should think it is necessary, especially in todays world!

reply

Nah, that study has been circulating for years. Fact is: the difference between circumsized and unsircumsized in that study is so slight that there is no real advantage to circumsizing (it's even possible that, if done with another test group, stats would be in favor of uncircumsized). Another fact is: People still die from bloodloss during circumsision (not many, but not many people get penile cancer either). Plus, there is a chance of penile deformaties following circumsizion; That's why I like to keep sharp objects away from my happy place.


This chick Marla did NOT have testicular cancer.

reply

Yeah, that is why it was tested on hundreds of men, to make sure, from different backgrounds! Actually, the bloodloss numbers are pretty slim also, and they usually take place at backdoor clinics, not in with people who are certified to perform the surgery, that goes with the deformities as well! Always get someone certified! I dunno, all I can say is that when in Europe, the ladies prefered the cut meat by far, many surprised and delighted that such thing existed! While in the States, even tho the cut is the norm, they still prefer it over the experiences with the uncut, although that's just an opinion of many! And for the person saying it's only done in the USofA w/o being a religious act, Canada has a great number in the English speaking part, and Australia is also emerging, low, but rising! But they are all just opinions and preferenses in the end, but the facts are that there are many advantages to that of an uncut man!

reply

Lol, I heard the contrary; cut men often produce more soreness. But hey, women will tell you anything to boost your ego. XD

By the way... the foreskin pulls back, so I can go with or without :)

This chick Marla did NOT have testicular cancer.

reply

yeah, they can say anything to boost your ego, but the facial expressions, priceless! As well as what comes after, and the calling you over and over again...for they want more...yeah, the charity work! But like I said, it is all opinion of the person, and the facts are there, so....no soreness! :D

reply

Facial expressions? I won't ask how you were able to compare the facial expressions between cut- and uncut sex XD. It's funny how cut men always try to defend their weewee by boasting about it's properties; usually, defensive macho behaviour is a result of insecurity.

This chick Marla did NOT have testicular cancer.

reply

Hmmm, lol! you're funny! I never said anything about how I compared with the uncut...I'm just telling you that was no ego-booster! But wouldn't you be doing the same...boasting about the properties of the uncut...insecure? Thank God I'm happy with what I got! Defensive Macho behavior...LOL! WOW! And no one was talking about penis size...wow...that's another discussion I don't need to get in...back to my math exam...cheers!

reply

That last comment was barely coherent, what on earth are you going on about?
And who is this "opinions of many" you keep referring to?

Anyway back to reason. Going back a few comments to the study that being uncircumcised reduces the chance of getting a sexually transmitted disease. I just don't buy into that. It does not take into account that if you practice safe sex (if you are not in a monogamous relationship), then there is very little chance of catching an infection. The suggestion of having a circumcision to try to avoid a sexually transmitted disease is just plainly ridiculuous not to mention irresponsible. If you follow this stupid statement you could say why not go all the way and be castrated - that way there will be a 100% chance you want get a sexually transmitted disease!

reply

Neptorjan,

The only way you could know the difference between cut and uncut, is if you are gay. Are you gay Neptorjan?

I usually take everything a woman says with a boulder of salt. A woman who is satified after sex doesn't have much to say anyway, they are usually to tired and spaced out after I'm done with them.

This chick Marla did NOT have testicular cancer.

reply

I htink the study was made since not all condoms work properly for there are risks of them breaking or other issues! i don't think it is meant to say, hey, get circumcised and go f-k the world! NO! And as for the relationships between two people lasting a life time, we all know thats crap! Seriously, like harrybastard said "I usually take everything a woman says with a boulder of salt."; they cheat, we (Men) cheat, so seriously, another form of protection is not bad! And no, I am not gay, although I do understand there is a fetish for the uncut. As for this comment "A woman who is satified after sex doesn't have much to say anyway, they are usually to tired and spaced out after I'm done with them." I also remember this comment by you harrybastard: "It's funny how cut men always try to defend their weewee by boasting about it's properties; usually, defensive macho behaviour is a result of insecurity." LOL! Insecurity there mate? Whatever! Cheers!

reply

Just stating a fact dude, if you have an energetic chatty woman next to you in bed after sex, talking about how great it was etc. etc., you can pretty much be sure the sex sucked (for her) and she's trying to boost your ego so you'll grow more confident and be better next time. A satisfied woman is a silent woman XD.

This chick Marla did NOT have testicular cancer.

reply

LOL! You need therapy! Serious help! Get some! Cheers!

reply

LOL! Can't! Too busy pleasuring women with my huge uncircumsized member! Bottems up!

This chick Marla did NOT have testicular cancer.

reply

I prefer uncut a whole lot more... and Nikolaj Lie Kaas is soo hot (just thought I'd add that in there).

reply

That may be the funniest desperate attempt to save ones self esteem ive ever read on here

reply

Tragic thing is that nobody is circumsized because they want so. They cut them when they are babies, and they have no other choice than to live with it, and convince themselves that it is great.

reply

thats ridiculous.

that are absolutely zero benefits of that amputation. the only benefit is if you are born with some deformity of the skin.

when you look at the statistics, they are totally irrelevant, dealing with like 0.5 and 1%.

dont be mislead by some people trying to push their pro-circumcision agendas! it is barbaric, unnecessary, and un-wholesome.

plus, who they heck wants their genitals to be covered with a huge ugly circumcision scar? wtf.

reply

There is absolutely nothing good about genital mutilation.

reply

That's quite normal you know. Only in the USA and certain jewish and muslim countries little boys are mutilated like that.

Did you ever notice that people who believe in creationism look really un-evolved? - Bill Hicks

reply

I saw this on Sundance with black bars over the males genitalia. What was that all about?

reply

Don't forget about Africa. At least in some non-muslim countries they do it on a large scale as well. There's even cases of forced circumcision by peers on secondary schools.

reply