MovieChat Forums > Festen (1998) Discussion > reaction of the guests

reaction of the guests


Hi everybody. As most of you, i really liked this movie, but i wanted to ask your opinions about the reaction of the guests to the revealed truth.

i found it quite unnatural that the guests were even dancing after listening to such terrible things and having breakfast in almost nothing-happened mood. And also Helene looked so happy and relieved during the breakfast. Is it because she already knew the truth before finding Linda's letter or she could cope up fast with the horrible secret of her family?

reply

I thing that's one of the main points of the movie: how the guests who might reperesent the "mass" in our society can act like "nothing happens"? How can they be so hipnotized by the media (or the music and hedonism in this case)? Basically none of us wants to leave our comforting and enjoyable status.

Of course this view is a little bit magnified but it is what actually happens in many families and in the world.

Most of us do not like to see the ugly parts of our planet, of our families, of ourselves, its more appealing to focus only on the nice portion, as if the the rest of it was not our problem...

reply

this is just a thought. The guests weren't given a choice - they were being forced to stay. Kim hid their keys and cancelled any cabs. So they had to continue on and deal with the evening however they might. I too, did think their behavior was a bit strange. But I think the poster above is right in that most people don't want to see the ugly truth and will just carry on and try to ignore it.

In a way, Christian and Linda had to do the same. They weren't given a choice. But they had to go on living under false pretenses for many years.

reply

At the beginning, I didn't quiet liked the film, although I was fascinated by the style, and the whole Dogme 95 thing basically. But as the film went on, I started liking it. Because of the conflicts, Christian's suprising speeches, the disturbing brutal fight scenes, and of course that strange behavior of the others etc. the whole party has a bitter taste. You can see many moments of them having fun, smiling, laughing, but you can feel during the whole thing that there is something not that much fun behind all that. That is one of the main reasons, if not the main reason I find this film great.

And I like the first answer, I would have never thought about that.

reply

Vinterberg, the director, actually did an experiment on filming this particular scene. He wanted to know what the typical reaction on recieving such news amongst the typical Scandinavian/Dane. So none of the guests at the party was told what Christians speach was to be about. They thought it would be a nice birthday speech. So when rehersing this scene, they actually heard it for the first time (which means they did not know the contents AT ALL before that). Their reaction was completely natural. Vinterberg had a theory that when faced with troublesome news that were too difficult to handle, the typical Scandinavian would rather ignore them and pretend it never happened, rather than face the truth. This scene was a proof of that, because that was how the actors reacted when they heard what Christian had to say.

**********
- Who's the lady with the log?
- We call her the Log Lady.

reply

Yes, I agree. Its probably cultural, Scandinavians are very cool people (ie not easily shocked) and the upper class everywhere are known to have dirty little secrets in the family. Also, being friends and relations, maybe it wasn't such a surprise to some of them.

reply

The fact that they knew they were actors in a film means that their reactions were as unnatural as if they'd been told what to do by the script. It may be a realistic reaction in the sense that people who aren't actors in a film might react in the same way, but there's a difference between realistic and real, and this was certainly not the latter.

reply

So I have a question for the non-Scandinavian posters on this board- how do you think your own particular culture would react if you were part of a dinner party in the same situation and stuck at the party-ie. hidden keys, cancelled cabs? I would personally say/do something if I had enough wine in me (maybe), I wouldn't be dancing, singing, or smiling afterwards. So the question is- perhaps this is- as the other posters have mentioned- Scandanavian behavior, or just human behavior in general? My partner works for an EU organization with many Nordic persons who are also my friends, and they are all very passionate and extroverted souls-I can't see any of them being passive in this situation- but then again, do we really know for sure how any of us would react? Shock may just silence all of us. This is a great examination of our psyche.

reply

I'm French and I don't think it's a question of culture. I have friends who live in a "tight knit" Christian family who puts a premium on "family values" and you would be amazed at the things that are being swept under the carpet and whenever someone brings them up, someone else turns into a joke and takes the "offender" away for a talk. It's not at all unlike the beginning of the movie.

I believe, however, that with the escalation, the fact everyone is coming back to eat, dance and stuff... is unrealistic. There should be a few people saying at least that they've had enough and staying in their room until the drama plays out. it would have been more credible for me if the circle of guests got smaller and smaller until only remains the children and their parents so that they could have it out and get to the truth.

For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco

reply

I'm sorry, but that is a load of *beep*

They might not have known what the speech would be about, but they sure as hell knew they were filming a movie and that it wasn't real.

Those were NOT natural responses, and there is no possible way the night would continue as planned if any of this happened in real life.

To see the true responses, you'd have to do it for real. With a group of people who don't know that they're part of an experiment.

reply

[deleted]

Interesting study of human response, isn't it?

Having had incest exposed in my mother's side of the family, all I could think of doing was to add a perspective of someone touched by it.

The first thought that struck me was the courage it takes to stand up to the adults of your childhood and be the one to yell out that the emperor has no clothes on...

And then to be as committed as Christian to keep coming back to face the fear that almost paralyzes you, trying again and again. Yes, he temporarily weakened when cornered by his boogeyman papa, but then even the Apostle Peter weakened after being warned that he would by the Christ. His character demonstrated amazing fortitude until his quest was completed.

But I stray... On the subject of this thread, I witnessed my grandparents covering up for my uncle's possible incest as they also did with his adolescent emotional problems, possibly as a result of Encephalitis lethargica, which was common in the 1920's. I might also mention that it was also common for adults in those days to keep secret all manner of failings by family members. Grandpa may have been an alcoholic, a great uncle may have died from syphilis, a great aunt who manifested signs of schizophrenia committed suicide laying under her umbrella at the beach one day... However, all such things were hushed up as though to speak of them might somehow create a common guilt that would infect all the other family members by association. Oh, and you would no doubt be looked down upon by society in general as well.

In my case, the crime of incest was exposed by a very courageous cousin of mine, and the driving motive was to sound the alarm and try and protect extended family members, grandchildren, etc, which may well have been on the character Christian's mind as well. My cousin's sisters reaction to her divulging this painful and very personal truth was oddly enough, anger. Even though they were without doubt molested too, they were bitterly angry with my cousin for making such crimes public, at least publicly to the family. It's been years now, and I'm not certain that the other girls have ever been quite able to come to grips with their suppressed memories and confronted the truth.

Another motive may have been what is common knowledge in medical circles that molested children sometimes grow up to be molesters themselves, and that all eyes should henceforth be wide open in the aftermath of such revelations, in an effort to prevent history from repeating itself.

It seemed to me that the family and friends portrayed in the film were at one point making a desperate attempt to flee the scene until it became obvious that they were being made to stay and become witnesses to this uncomfortable expose. Yes, what would we do? What could we do, other than serve as witnesses?

We probably aren't in a position to offer evidence and have either of the parents arrested. We may be drunk enough to express our horror by verbal or physical attack. But, on the whole, the evidence remains heresay and the problem primarily a family matter, to either report the father, deliver him to medical care, disassociate from one or both of the parents, or perhaps all three. In this case, the father inferred disassociation was a given.

The film was moving, and I've always been amazed at the frequency of such a crime in this day and age and in a society that considers itself, for the most part, civilized.

reply

I'm glad that someone else who knows about incest was able to respond to this thread. It happened in my family, and I've also read a lot about it. It's amazing how people will just act so casual, and that's even when they believe that incest happened. But usually the accuser is not believed, and then people can go about their business and act like nothing happened.

We want people to instantly band together and protect victims, like in most movies, but that's rarely the case, and that's shown here. Even the victims will be brainwashed and protect the rapist, in real life.

I'm not going to get personal, so I'll point out Oprah's experience. She was 9 when she was raped by her 19-year-old cousin. They were then both invited to various family get-togethers and she was surprised to find herself preparing food for him. That's real life, unfortunately.

reply

Poor Buzz ....did you get raped by Kevin?


"Baba Booey! Baba Booey!"

reply

I guess the invited guests trying to honor the host whatever happens and I feel they assume what Cristian say is not necessarily true, plus Helge stories about Christian's imaginary friend who can muster the opinion that Christian have mental illness. And after Helge's daughter (I forget his name) read the Linda's suicide letter all guests were trying to understand because there are words of frills in a dream when Linda returned raped by her father. For me it is the words that are intentionally added by Helge's daughter so that guests assume Linda have hesitate at the time, and for a scene of the last meal for me it not for Helge cause Michael expelling Helge to out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last film's I've Saw (All Re-Watch Expert Vinding Vivian Maier):

Festen 9,75/10
Colossal Youth 9,40/10
The Wire S01Ep05 The Pager 10/10
Tokyo Godfathers 8,45/10
Vinding Vivian Maier 8,60/10
Chaplin (1992) 7,15/10

reply

Contrast this with the reaction of the town's folks in Vinterberg's "The Hunt" (2012) - where after hearing the accusation, the whole town turns violently against Lucas.

reply

Yes, here they just ignore it and in The Hunt everyone freaks out. Same director. I just think he didn't even go for realism. He just wanted to make 2 movies with simple people where everyone were a bit idiotic.

reply

Maybe in 1998 people were not, generally, as fearful towards accusations of child sexual abuse as they later became in 2012?

reply

Watch the documentary the Witch Hunt narrated by Sean Penn, free on YouTube. It very shortly mentions the witchhunt feminists started in the 70's against a huge satanic cult that had killed and eaten 10.000 children in USA. They really believed it and the news ran with it - all news about fear sells. A lot of people were imprisoned for it. It was as big a fear back then as terror is a fear today.

Hundreds of years ago we feared death not molestation as many people died young. We always have something to fear. It's nothing new. But today we also have intelligent psychologists telling us how fear works. In the 80's it was totally new to us. So Vinterberg probably had never heard of it when he made Celebration. Today false confessions and false rape claims are all over the news all the time and we know how the police can manipulate children into making up rape claims.

reply

Speaking of witch hunts, did you know that over 500 years ago there were these witch hunts against people who believed that those people are ACTUALLY witches, and yet paradoxically, in places like Ancient Greece, possibly before that, pedophilia was accepted and seen as normal.

reply

well the circumstances are different. In "the hunt", it was a little girl who told that she was sexually assaulted. children are believed to be pure and naive, and who would thought that such horrible thing will come out from a small girl's mouth? that leads the people to think the crime is true. people love children, and will do everything to protect a child's pureness.
however in Festen, the "criminal" is the father, who is the authority of this family and everyone has a deep respect for him. When such heavy accusation occurs, people tend to pretend it doesn't happen because on the one hand it is very hard to believe this nasty accusation contradicts with the image of their respectful father, and on the other hand, they don't dare to accept and admit this challenge to the authority.

reply

Some reactions were more realistic than others.

reply

I think the guests were startled but thought Christian was maybe mentally ill.

It's that man again!!

reply