Janet Jackson


I thought she looked really pretty in this movie. She wasn't as thin as she has been in the past, but she looked good with a little meat on her bones. I am female, and straight, but I just have to give credit where credit is due. Am I the only one who feels this way?

no day but today

reply

I agree. Janet looked very pretty, as always. And she is a great actress.

reply

HOTT as hell. She is one of my oldest celebrity crushes and she looked breathtaking in this movie.

reply

Yeah, pretty maybe ... but compared to Jada's character in the first movie, I found Janet's character whiny, 'precious' and could see her being a bit of an emotional drain to be involved with. Jada's character was more upbeat, more sure of herself, and not whiny.

Still loved the movie though - bought the two as a set and enjoy watching them every now and then. Some of Eddie's best work, to me

reply

She looked hawt!

reply

She's as pretty as Michael. That's neither good for a man, or a woman.

reply

i do not think so may be she looks good at the level of shape and diffidently she has pretty smile but at the level of acting she was not impressive at all

reply

@amrelmarakby Acting? Who said anything about acting?

reply

Her acting was okay but I agree, she looked very hot in this movie.

"I am the ultimate badass, you do not wanna `*beep*` wit me!"- Hudson in Aliens.

reply

[deleted]

I never really thought Jane was attractive,but in this movie she did not look bad

reply

She was really attractive in the film, but she is a better singer than actress.

reply

Michael Jackson with T*ts

reply