this movie is no more historically accurate than the first one
It's really annoying to see people saying: "Well read up on your history, Pocahontas married John Rolfe so this movie is more accurate than the first one!"
Seriously, that's a horrible argument. Nothing in this movie was historically accurate. At least the original film had a great story -- this was just an attempt to profit off a brand that already existed. Disney wasn't trying to set Pocahontas's story straight, they wanted to make a quick buck, so they took a magnificent movie and made a crappy sequel that cancelled out the entire previous story. Sad, but true.
How do people not understand this?