Was that his real...?


I am curious if that was a prsothetic penis (à la Boogie Nights) on Neill Barry in that outdoor strip scene. Was it? Or should I have him call me?

The Nimble, Limber One.

reply

[deleted]

Well, well. Maybe I should give you my number!! I hope you like androgynous types.

...and now, The I'd DO Him Dancers!!

reply

[deleted]

well I do like androgynous potato chips...

does that count ;)
...if they happen to be hot 'n' spicy, yes!!

...and now, The I'd DO Him Dancers!!

reply

Looked real to me.

BUT, something you ladies might wanna keep in mind....if it's large when it's flaccid, it typically doesn't grow much more from that when it becomes erect. (As opposed to a guy with a smaller flaccid penis that grows dramatically more as it becomes erect).
At the end of the day, most guys are around the same ballpark when with hard-on.

And before anyone throws it out, no I don't have a little penis (I'm average sized). Just something that men realize more since we own them. lol

reply

Just something that men realize more since we own them. lol
Do you own them outright, or are some of you still making payments? I'd hate to have a repo man come in at an inopportune moment!

Carpe DO'em!!

reply

FYI, since we screw them, we are fairly well appraised of the variety available. Ownership may have its privileges, but viewing hours have perks too :P

reply


Ok, less talk and more pics of this guy's "member".


reply

I really think it was CGI enhansed.

reply

So how come we NEVER get to see a close-up of a VAGINA in a mainstream, R-rated movie? (I'm talking about the actual female genitalia, not just pubic hair) Movies can show full male genitalia close-up (pubic hair, penis, and testicles) but we never get to see full female genitalia in close-up detail. (pubic hair, clitoris, and vulva). Its a total double-standard. The women can see dick; we men should be allowed to see cooch too!

reply

Please. Whenever male gentalia is shown, it is usually for comedic effect, or in some other way not a turn-on. (Geoffrey Rush being unpleasantly stripped in Quills ad jumping on a trampoline in Shine spring to mind.) And it's rarely erect. (Intimacy is an exception.) If it were, it'd be an atomatic NC-17 I'm sure.

When women are depicted full-frontal it is made to be sexy.

Besides, this movie was hardly mainstream. It was a low budget indie which I doubt even made it to theatres.

But I do agree, close-ups for both genders down there would be nice!

reply

I disagree. Both the male and female bodies are beautiful.

reply

[deleted]

I'm not gay but I can admit to being impressed with Neill's cock. It was very ballsy of the director to actually show his penis whereas most films would only show a rear shot + reaction. I absolutely loved the reaction of the women--so ridiculously over the top! And their discussion afterwards was great, talking about how they wouldn't even know what to do with a cock that big--even though we all know they'd love to experience one that huge.

The only thing that kind of threw me off about the whole scene was the fact that his own SISTER knew how big his dick was. Did I miss a line that explained this? It's kind of unsettling but if you can remove yourself from the fact that Suzanne Cryer was playing his sister and just think of it has a sexy actress being blown away by the sight of a startlingly enormous cock, that element of the scene is much more enjoyable.

reply

I'm not gay but I can admit to being impressed with Neill's cock. It was very ballsy of the director to actually show his penis whereas most films would only show a rear shot + reaction. I absolutely loved the reaction of the women--so ridiculously over the top! And their discussion afterwards was great, talking about how they wouldn't even know what to do with a cock that big--even though we all know they'd love to experience one that huge.

The only thing that kind of threw me off about the whole scene was the fact that his own SISTER knew how big his dick was. Did I miss a line that explained this? It's kind of unsettling but if you can remove yourself from the fact that Suzanne Cryer was playing his sister and just view it as a sexy actress being blown away by the sight of a startlingly enormous cock, that element of the scene is much more enjoyable.

reply