Well, if your 'kids' are parroting the violence of Laurel and Hardy shorts, it's a sign that kids today are stupider than kids of previous generations. First off, kids who watched films like L&H, or even The Three Stooges, in the 1950's and '60's didn't grow up to be violent thugs, sending each other to the hospital with boards and hammers being beaten over their heads, or teeth knocked out from slaps in the face.
On the other hand, the amount of violence in today's society is enormous, especially in the lower income and ghetto neighborhoods, and most of today's kids and youth have no idea who Laurel and Hardy were, much less the Stooges. Much less nearly all of the "violent" cartoons which were aired daily during the 1950's and 1960's, whether Bugs was hitting Elmer with a rake, Porky was smacking Daffy with a pie, or roadrunner was causing coyote to run into an anvil. On the other hand, they get full plates of violence in thousands of action movies and television crime dramas.
Would that kids today saw more Laurel and Hardy and less Batman or CSI. And don't even get me started on so-called "sitcoms", replete with smutty, rude and crude double entendres. (Tall guy walks in and introduce himself as Dick. "Well, you're the biggest Dick I've ever seen!" says the office worker. Audience laughs like hell; and your kid picks up on the smut.) I'll take L&H, any day of the week.
reply
share