I'll let your response to the car-I don't know what really is shown to support it. I differ with your view on the phone call.
I don't know what has been posted on the Sweet Hereafter site, so I cannot say whether that's fair or not.
What I believe is fair is to say that the daughter had some complicity in the affair. Before anyone flips out, please just focus on my reasoning.
Due to the fact that the incest had been going on for some time, and that the particular scene we are referring to was instigated by a phone call by the daughter, they are both active in the incest in a purely factual way. Now the question is, why did she make the call and why didn't she tell her mom?
I think there are two things- but please keep in mind I'm not an abuse specialist or psychologist-her shame over her vicimization, and the wanting the love of a parent.
From what I know of shame, a child believes that their parents are perfect. If something imperfect happens then the child must be responsible for it. So they supplant their needs and goals, and can suffer greatly for it. I think that is why she never told her mom or anyone-because she feels it's her fault. Of course it isn't.
Now why assist him in the incest by calling? This also ties to two (edited & paraphrased) quotes: Why don't you do it like with mom, and you ___ up the ___ dad.
I didn't think much of them at first, but I have a thought that sex with dad is what love looks like for the daughter. Dad loves mom, has sex with her. Dad loves me by having sex with me. To get his love she lets him have sex with her. Kids will try to win the approval and love of a parent at the cost of themselves. What might make the whole experience even worse for her is that it's not the same kind of sex, which might be why she was so specific in that last quote.
Let me be clear: She was a victim, and he was fully to blame. What I'm talking about is the way we can adapt, and twist logic to survive and attempt to be accepted by our parents.
reply
share