[deleted]
[deleted]
I think they wanted to oddly contrast the downbeat ending with a message of hope. Yeah, Tony’s likely dead but his family can make good lives for themselves if they choose.
shareNot likely, he is dead. Anyone who thinks he is not did not pay enough attention.
shareHe is dead, plus they can make good lives for themselves, especially now that their link to the mob has been cut.
shareNot likely, he is dead. Anyone who thinks he is not did not pay enough attention.
Pay attention to what? Editing shots? Something a character said that, in retrospect, seems to foretell Tony's demise?
Chase didn't know how to end it and played us all for chumps with that steaming pile.
share
"Pay attention to what? Editing shots? Something a character said that, in retrospect, seems to foretell Tony's demise?"
Since you're asking sarcastically, it is clear that you don't understand film, that's fine, but then maybe stfu and learn instead of being all edgy about it?
There are tons of analysis videos on YT about this, most of them explain very well why he is absolutely dead. But hey don't let that stop you.
In case you do want to jump over your own shadow:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy7tMx6ix8g
There are tons of analysis videos on YT about this, most of them explain very well why he is absolutely dead.
Hmm.."analysis" videos... Yeah, I've seen those crocks of shite and while they manage to string together a decent theory, at the end of the day they mean exactly zip. If Gandolfini hadn't died, there's an excellent chance they would have done a movie sequel, and there is nothing in the final episode that says he's dead that would have prevented the sequel. If it wasn't filmed - it didn't happen. The scene went to black. End of the story. The rest of the mental masturbation that fans put themselves through is just self abuse.
Chase played his fans for fools, and they're dancing to his out of tune fiddler on cue seeing something that doesn't exist.
share
I love how you blatantly dismiss "analysis" (it is exactly that, why the quotation marks?) videos without a single argument. That's a good keyword actually, arguments. So far, you had none except "lol I am right and you are stoopid".
And that is why I won't waste any more time on you.
Don't feed, let them starve...
Well, you certainly do enjoy your arrogance! Oh, and make sure you ignore this:
If Gandolfini lived and they did a movie sequel, there is nothing in the final episode that says he's dead and would have prevented the sequel. If it wasn't filmed- it didn't happen. The scene went to black. End of the story.
share
So by that rationale is any movie character that dies offscreen still, in fact, alive?
share
I won't even dignify that remark by explaining it, or did you not read my post at all?
Yes, you said ‘if it wasn’t filmed, it didn’t happen’ and so I’m asking by that rationale is any movie character that dies offscreen still, in fact, alive?
What is your answer?
Family Guy is on right now. Go watch it.
Why are you running away from the question?
share
I don't expect you to understand reductio ad absurdum or the word "context" for that matter, nor will I try to explain either to you. In the meantime, good news: there will be a new series of Beavis and Butthead coming out. Enjoy.
Let’s try again. You said ‘if it wasn’t filmed, it didn’t happen’ and so I’m asking by that rationale is any movie character that dies offscreen still, in fact, alive?
What is your answer?
Your "question" is a non sequitur and doesn't deserve an answer.
You think you're laying a trap with your question but you're really a lot like Elmer Fudd trying to catch rabbits. You're setting your trap in the woods and everyone else is on the main road.
You had a chance to go back and read the thread in context and, assuming you did, still can't comprehend how inane your question is or why anyone would dignify such an inane question with an answer.
But before I go, there's more good news!:
https://collider.com/bill-and-ted-3-on-demand-release-date-trailer-keanu-reeves-alex-winter/
Let’s try again. You said ‘if it wasn’t filmed, it didn’t happen’ and so I’m asking by that rationale is any movie character that dies offscreen still, in fact, alive?
What is your answer?
Your "question" is a non sequitur and doesn't deserve an answer.
You think you're laying a trap with your question but you're really a lot like Elmer Fudd trying to catch rabbits. You're setting your trap in the woods and everyone else is on the main road.
You had a chance to go back and read the thread in context and, assuming you did, still can't comprehend how inane your question is or why anyone would dignify such an inane question with an answer.
But before I go, there's more good news!:
https://collider.com/bill-and-ted-3-on-demand-release-date-trailer-keanu-reeves-alex-winter/
It’s a question about your assertion, all you need to do is clarify what you meant.
Let’s try again. You said ‘if it wasn’t filmed, it didn’t happen’ and so I’m asking by that rationale is any movie character that dies offscreen still, in fact, alive?
What is your answer?