MovieChat Forums > Cruel Intentions (1999) Discussion > What if Anette was the one who had cruel...

What if Anette was the one who had cruel intentions!


It just came out to my mind when i saw the ending, when Annette drove Sebastian's car with a weird smile and somehow not showing any grieve at all. And suddenly all those flashbacks that show 'romantic' memories of Annette and Sebastian together were shown (or in my theory, flashbacks that show moments where Sebastian finally fall into Annette's arms)

What if, Annette was the one who planned to destroy these siblings (and we will never know why, but one thing for sure, she had already known Katherine and Sebastian more than they knew). And she started it by fake writing article in a magazine about how proud she was being that girl who wouldn't have sex outside marriage and made sure that Sebastian would read it, because she knew that Sebastian love all those challenging kind of girls. Besides that, it actually quite confuses me how easy she changed her mind and actually be the one who 'invite' Sebastian to have sex with her. Soooo somehow she managed to catch the siblings's (especially sebastian) attention and have them playing in her game. Sebastian's dead, Katherine's reputation was ruined, and she had Sebastian's jaguar as a bonus. Well, these siblings were no more than her toys. Oh! And it actually explains quite much about the poster (at least for me lol)

Well just a thought of someone who's craving for plot twist

reply

thats actually a cool theory! I'm diggin it!

I think Annette's article might be genuine, but I think it is a very intriguing thing to think of that maybe Katherine and Sebastian were set up themselves, or at least Annette caught wind of it early on and flip the tables.

Annette was very well informed of Sebastion before going to New York. Who's to say she wasn't informed of Katherine?

reply

Well that's one way too see it tho! but i still think it's way too easy for Sebastian to at least made her swam with him in the middle of the night, noting that she just knew him for several days and she had a boyfriend. (well it's weird for me probably because i'm an asian lol)

reply

[deleted]

Why should Annette or Cecile be punished or come to bad ends? They were hardly depraved or bad people if the bad guys had tried to corrupt them and succeeded a little. I liked that the movie was pretty true to the novel but I thought Valmont coming to have doubts, regrets and at least a little redemption was a change that worked.

reply

[deleted]

But in the film Valmont wasn't really trying to hurt Annette and Cecile, just hurt their reputations and nowadays having premarital sex isn't that ruinous to peers or the audience.

Even the original novel definitely had Valmont and Merteuil as villains but also had undercurrents that the broader society was flawed, that it left young women too uninformed about desire and seduction and then was too harshly judgmental of them if they were seduced. So it makes sense that in a different social context and attitudes the consequences be different and even the general sense of tragedy be reduced.

reply

Frankly, I think you're giving Annette too much credit. Besides, as Sebastian's girlfriend she could just ask to borrow the Jag whenever she wanted. Screw Kathryn.

Speaking of whom: in the 18th-century novel, the Marquise is afflicted with smallpox, which was almost a death sentence back then (vaccinations only having recently become available) and definitely a degradation in the days before plastic surgery. Perhaps it would have been more apropos - and more realistic in the context of the social behavior of quite a few American teenagers in the 1990s - if Cecile's mind had completely snapped due to her rape and she brought a gun to school and shot Kathryn in the face (although, come to think of it, she probably would have shot Sebastian instead, had he lived). Somehow, after all those dirty doings, seeing Kathryn in a hospital bed with her formerly beautiful face plastered up and living in terror that Cecile might somehow return to finish her off would have made for a more palatable closer.

reply

[deleted]

If you read the original book that is the "cruel" twist. That she was more manipulative than both Sebastian and Kathryn but was less obvious in her manipulation. She flaunts her body to get him interested, says no, no no and keeps him at arms lengths. Just imagine a very bored, wealthy guy with all the time and money in the world who spends it trying to seduce women and ruin their reputations. A much bigger deal during the French Revolution. That's how he gets his jollies. He's looking for a challenge, a conquest. The books is about letters, letters between young people, friends, potential lovers, fremenies and revenge. About two friends, rivals (and ex-lovers) who use seduction as a weapon to humiliate and degrade others. It's where the phrase "Revenge is a dish that's best served cold." Before Sebastian dies, he gives Danceny (Ronald) the letters (his diary) proving Merteuil's own involvement. These letters are sufficient to ruin her reputation so she flees to the countryside, where she contracts smallpox. Her face is left permanently scarred and she is rendered blind in one eye, so she loses her greatest asset: her beauty.

reply

I doubt it. At the end she is no longer the virginal goody-two-shoes she was at the start, and she has learned some coldness in her behaviour, like setting Katherine up the way Katherine has done to others, but there is no support for the idea Annette had this all planned from the beginning.

"Chicken soup - with a *beep* straw."

reply

That actually would make complete sense...First, she arrives at the Valmont home with no valid explanation...She drives off, showing no grief or remorse after her boyfriend's death...Annette could be the real b*tch who would take down Katheryn.

reply

I read this somewhere .....in the original ending Annette is driving away in the car, smiling. Test audiences suspected the same thing as the OP (that Annette had played everyone). However, this wasn't the filmmakers' intentions, so to speak. They then integrated the clips of Annette and Seb's romance into the driving scene to remind the audience that their love was real.

reply

I had exactly the same thought while watching the end. It also contributes to the movie's theme of circles and karma.

However, I have no doubt that they both fell in love with each other. Both of them had cruel intentions but both of them at the end fell in love and cared. This is why I can't phathom the idea that she published this. Why did she do that ? She exposed both of them, not only Kathyrn.

reply