Can good actors save bad movies?
Preamble: if you want to know what it means if an actor says he/she only did it because they needed the money, look no further than the talent wasted in Judas kiss.
Superb Alan and Emma cannot save this junk. Pearls before swines etc...
Al Pacino was in some pretty poor fare too, but I cannot think of any movie that turned out as pityful as Judas kiss. But maybe I'm mistaken? If not, is Al Pacino the better actor? Or was he just lucky?