MovieChat Forums > Fight Club (1999) Discussion > Why weren't there any women in the fight...

Why weren't there any women in the fight club?


It made it seem like it was an all-boys club.

Were women not allowed to join?


reply

They would join but soon as they would break a nail they would quit.

reply

Or they marry/babymama an NFL player and get all the full-contact violence they want there!

reply

I can imagine Marla beating the crap out of everyone there, lol

It was pretty clear that it was an all-men's club

When you play the game of monopoly, you win or you go bankrupt. There is no middle ground.

reply

[deleted]

No woman would last more than an hour on the porch...

reply

Because it's a fight club.

reply

We are a generation raised by women, I am starting to question if another one really is the answer to all our questions.

reply

Why not? They could decorate the place. In fact, that'd be the only thing women could do.

reply

Seriously: because the movie is a male-centered fantasy about having been neutered and sedated by a vast commercial conspiracy (all the testicular cancer, let's all cry and confess our feelings stuff) and resorting to their most primal, bare knuckle brawling, blowing up *beep* male selves to become whole again. There's no place for women in such a fantasy (except as sex partners, which is the only reason Marla is even there). It even blames its problems on "a generation raised by women", nastily enough. ==There's a lot more to it than that, needless to say, but that's the reason it doesn't have or require female characters; there's no room for our point of view in it.

reply

That. Also, the Narrator has a fear of women on some level. He in part concocts Tyler because he's attracted to Marla but is too insecure to act on it. It's a "safe" male-only space.

___
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qssvnjj5Moo

reply

The Narrator *is* Marla. And Tyler. etc. Ponder it.

reply

I have, and rejected it.

___
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qssvnjj5Moo

reply

by forthesafetyofpuppies (Sat May 16 2015 13:12:35) IMDb member since July 2006

I have, and rejected it.


^^^...this is why you will continue to ponder irrelevant questions like the one posed in the thread title...

...and why you will continue to post incorrect piffle that 10 seconds of effort would have prevented you great embarrassment, like this one...


by JayCeezy (Sat May 16 2015 12:37:02) IMDb member since July 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by forthesafetyofpuppies (Sat May 16 2015 12:32:59)IMDb member since July 2006

They both came out in '99.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nah. Fight Club, 1999. A Beautiful Mind, 2001. Two years later.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0268978/?ref_=nv_sr_1

reply

^^^...this is why you will continue to ponder irrelevant questions like the one posed in the thread title...

You may want to inform the cast, because I mostly stole my observation from something Helena Bonham Carter says on the commentary. A commentary, which I might add, contains not the slightest allusion to the crackpot theory you've subscribed to. 



Really, you can interpret a film any way you like. But why get p!ssed when someone disagrees with it?

___
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qssvnjj5Moo

reply

The cast are not the writers. They may have their own interpretation, but the writers are the ones who actually understand the characters they created.

Your argument might work, if this was only a film. The problem is, it's an adaptation from a novel.

The new home of Welcome to Planet Bob: http://kingofbob.blogspot.ca/

reply