Major Mike Norman - cameo?


Inspired by another post elsewhere, and remembering how good this film was, I recently bought the DVD version, and it's still every bit as good as I remember it.

Looking in the credits and also confirmed here, I noticed that Major Mike Norman (OC Naval Party 8901 and military advisor for the film) has a cameo as "FIDF Stalwart". Does anyone have any idea in which scene('s) he appears?

I was thinking he's in the scene with the two FIDF guys on the football pitch, with a thermos and a box of sandwiches - at 1hr 20mins in. I think Norman is the man who says he'll go off to telephone HQ - as I think the other FDIF man in the scene is a character listed as "Butcher" who appears at the very start (as a Butcher, surpringly enough).

Any thoughts? Opinions? Or even better, does anyone know the answer?

reply

Hi , I am the writer/director of the film . Thanks for the kind comments. And yes, all your assumptions were correct.

reply

Wow, how cool is that! The movie was nicely done, I loved it!

What was it like workin with Bob Peck and the real Maj. Mike Norman? :)

reply

I stumbled across this conversation this evening. I remember the original broadcast of this and I happened to record it on VHS at LP quality, I ended up watching it repeatedly and adored it. Suffice to say the VHS tape did not last forever so some years later I was thrilled to see a DVD release and purchased it. I had an issue with the sound (there was this constant whistle) but I was more concerned to find that it appeared to be a shorter cut of the original. I genuinely long to be able to watch the full length version again. Is there ANY way of obtaining this?

Kind regards and huge thanks for your work.

reply

Thanks, Trev, for your very kinds words!
Alas, the BBC has been very difficult indeed about us doing a restoration of the film where I was going to show it in my original 2 hr 12 minute version as well. We have a distributor ready to foot a reasonable bill, but the Beeb are not being reasonable :-)
So, for the foreseeable future, nothing doing.
Stuart Urban
@stuart_urban
www.stuarturban.com

reply

I wish you luck in your battle with the BBC and really hope this film gets the treatment it deserves. I just viewed it for the first time last night, and was utterly captivated by it. Great script and direction, wonderful casting, and really heartfelt. This film surely warrants restoration and a return to its full length--I'll be among the first to purchase a copy when and if this happens. In the meantime, thanks for a really good film!

reply

Thanks for your kind words and support.

Actually, we are doing some behind the scene moves which the BBC is being more helpful on, I am glad to say.

Perhaps there WILL be a restoration and re-release.

Watch the Twitterspace for news @stuart_urban !

reply

Thanks very much for your response, and for the update.

Initially, I came by this film on the basis of its starring Ian Richardson--I've been an admirer of his for years, and have been trying to view as many of his works on film as I can come by--(unfortunately, a good bit of his work is still not available in the US in NTSC format, so I'm thankful for region-free DVD players and Amazon UK) so I was pleased to see he was surrounded by a cast and direction that were worthy of his talent, and I was also intrigued by the presentation of the material.

As a young American adult when the conflict occurred, I saw nothing more than US media coverage of it in those pre-cable days, so this film was a bit of an eye-opener, giving a good depiction of the UK POV in a very even-handed treatment. It was also blessedly free of the sort of macho chest-beating that American productions sometimes fall prey to when depicting war and combat, but gave a very good idea of how harsh the invasion really was--something we got very little sense of in this country at the time: the result was that best of things, a most enjoyable and informative contemporary history lesson, really engagingly presented.

Again, all luck with the restoration project--do keep us posted, as I'm sure there are others besides myself who'd be happy to see this in its full form.

reply