MovieChat Forums > Elizabeth (1999) Discussion > A question about Geoffrey Rush's charact...

A question about Geoffrey Rush's character...


Was he supposed to be homosexual?
The film is kind of vague on a lot of things but I felt this was especially unclear.
Like in the beginning when he cuts the young guys throat, why was the guy going to kill him? Was he a male prostitute who resented Walsingham?
What's more though is later during a party scene the camera seems to bounce back a forth between Walsingham & Elyot whose young & handsome & I just found it kind of random.
Also, why does John Ballard(Daniel Craig) kill Elyot on the beach?

Just curious for some insight from someone who knows more about the actual history.

reply

I've always wondered about the boy in the room. It seemed odd he would be there, especially in a state of undress, unless they were having a go of it. But it was never addressed again, or his sexuality when he comes to court, so I couldn't tell you.

With Elyot, however, I think the reason he keeps looking at him at the party was to signify his ability to spot weakness and opportunity in others. He saw someone he could employ as a spy/agent in Norfolk's camp. That's why he was killed later, as obviously the priest found out about it somehow.

reply

Definitely got that vibe. I assumed the young man he was with had been hired to assassinate Walsingham and had made the attempt during/post-seduction.

It's never stated explicitly, but I think it's heavily implied enough to be true. I also think this is the reason Walsingham manages to rise above a lot of the court BS - he isn't mooning over the new queen, he isn't distracted by courtly lovers because he has to get his jollies on the sly...

reply

Exactly true. I think the real historian is gay. But I concur with your observations. It is also part of the reason he is so hated as he is impossible to manipulate and is very cold, calculating, and really loves his country and is married to his Queen.

reply