How did they do the lion scene at the start of the movie? When jackie chan is running away from it and it like half a foot away from getting him?
-----
Hint: If you do not want to look mentally handicap, use the [quote ] tag.
Is this in the U.S. version of the movie, because I don't remember that? Maybe it's only in the uncut original version.
shareIt was an amazing scene.
shareit wasnt a real tiger,it was sammo hung in a tigersuit
sharehere is a screenshot of the scene, its only in the uncut version (2 hour version). That screen is jackie running up the tree while the lion jumping up after him after he was being chased on the ground.
http://img282.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=904000521_WhoAmI.avi_snapsh ot_00.16.41_2012.09.30_17.50.48_122_552lo.jpg
-----------
Dont be lazy, use the [quote ] [/ quote] tag.
> Dont be lazy, use the [quote ] [/ quote] tag.
Now you are trying to use ANOTHER form of shaming language to make people conform to YOUR quotation preferences?
Why?
Are you a control freak? Why do you want people to do that (still non-working) quote-tag stuff so desperately?
At least be user-friendly about it and show people the correct, WORKING version (if they copypaste what you suggested, it won't work, so what's the point of using it? They would have to figure out how to fix it anyway, so you may just as well leave the [] out and speak only about "the quote-tag". And you are still missing a hyphen, too (I think))!
Tell me, what's the connection between laziness and having different preferences about quotation than you? Or do you admit you are just trying to use shaming tactics to get people to OBEY your desperation?
That's pretty pathetic, man. You will never get people to obey you, people have their preferences! That's like trying to convert someone who loves orange color to love grey instead. You'll never be able to do it!
If anything, your continuous insistence (with bad grammar), together with your manipulation tactics (shaming language) only reinforces my determination to keep my independent quotation styles. Even if I would have otherwise once considered what you so clumsily demand.. eh, suggest, now I am convinced to NEVER do it. Just so you will never get the pleasure.
But in any case, I, like most other people, will choose their quotation preferences based on their individual selection-making process, and there's nothing you can do about it. At best, you will only succeed in annoying people (with bad grammar and shaming tactics), at worst, someone might get pissed off enough that they will find you and give you some pretty heavy lectures that you will remember the rest of your life.
My suggestion; don't try to change people's choices - I don't even know why you would want to! Why would you care WHAT people use to quote? Don't you have enough real problems, that you have to invent fabricated ones by messing with other people's choices and then trying to shame them if they don't conform to your ridiculous demands - eh, suggestions..?
I don't usually ask this, but ..
What's wrong with you?
It was done with superimposing and green screen, Jackie and the lion were never in the same scene actually.
share"Hint: If you do not want to look mentally handicap, use the [quote ] tag. "
I think you mean "mentally handicapped", which is not a real term anyway, because handicap is always physical.
And whatever type, method or way of quoting others someone uses, has nothing to do with their mental faculties any more than your choices of what type of underpants you wear. It's just a matter of taste.
I could have quoted you like this:
> Hint: If you do not want to look mentally handicap, use the [quote ] tag.
This was the old BBS-style. Also, your tag has a mistake in it - you are not supposed to leave a space after the word "quote", otherwise it doesn't work. Yes, I know why you did it that way - if you did it properly, it would -become- a quote, and not show as a command. But why not just say "the quote-tag" instead of even using the []? I also think you are missing a hyphen before the word "tag".
In any case, if using quotation marks was good enough for Mark Twain and all those legendary authors in human history, it should definitely be good enough for humble pseudo-realtime, unofficial IMDb forum discussions.
And/or, if the old BBS-style was good enough for all those excellent people that used to have long and meaningful, even sophisticated and deep discussions in the old Bulletin Board Systems, it should dámn well be good enough for everyone, especially you people who can't seem to even grasp the basic english grammar, although english is the most easy language in the world (after telepathy, perhaps).
Grow up, and stop telling others how they should do things - no one is going to look mentally handicap [sic] just because they don't conform to YOUR quotation preferences.
If YOU do not want to look like a retarded mongoloid, perhaps you can admit I am right, hmm?
(And before anyone attacks me because of my choice of words, I have just watched "Extras" and "The Office", as well as some of Gervais's live comedy stuff, and certain things just struck me as hilarious - the word 'mongoloid' is pretty funny in itself, and since I don't mean any offense, no one should be offended)
Lastly, I hope you see the irony of using bad grammar when trying to explain to others how NOT to look like you have mental problems..