You can always tell stupid dawn of the internet age kids on comments like this.
It's already stupid to try and act like stuff is new when all of fiction rips off of stuff in the past, there are no exceptions, yet people on here try and act liek SWAT KATS war original when it was just the same as all the years before it.
People like half-assed arguments saying how Flintstones and Jetsons were the same show because they played out the same way and that characters changes, setting changes, etc all meant nothing. Same kind of stupid arguments come at saying Scooby Doo, Josie, Jabberjaw, etc.
Now here we are acting like SWAT Kats was new? Hell no show plays out just the same as all the other super hero and action shows HB did for years. You want to throw *beep* arguments saying the above were the same, then how the hell is SWAT KATs different from Space Ghost and Herculoids? Heroes beat the hell out of bad guys. That's all the premise is, clearly all the differences in characters, setting and all mean nothing and SWAT Kats was recycling plots just the same as all the others.
Plus half the characters in this show are "ripping off" Characters from other media. Not even the idea of humanoid KATS was new to SWAT Kats. It ripped off a Rankin bass show that did it in the 80s. It wasn't novel or clever. It was a basic idea that they used to change the characters. No different from using a talking dog or a talking shark.
And what the hell kind of **** is it about the picture. They still cut corners in the 90s as they did for years. The only difference was under a Turner Watchdog era they had more money to spend on certain projects and had fewer projects then when they sold cartoons to all three major networks every season most of the time competing with themselves. When that weight is off your shoulder you get a little more money, but still SWAT KATS was hardly that much better than anything else of the time.
I refuse to argue on IMDB until the general populous actually uses their brains
reply
share