MovieChat Forums > He Got Game (1998) Discussion > Murderer set free for a week???

Murderer set free for a week???


No way that would happen in real life. So what if he has an ankle monitor?

reply

I think the circumstances were taken into account. He didn't intend to kill her. He caused her to fall down and hit her head, but he didn't fire a gun at her chest. It could be described as an accidental murder.

I know who I am! I'm a dude playing a dude disguised as another dude!

reply

to be honest I'm surprised he didn't get manslaughter in stead of murder

reply

He did get manslaughter right? I think his sentence was 10 - 15 years right? I don't know what life is in NY

reply

Our government can make anything happen "in real life". Murderers have been pardoned. Remember, they made it look like he had food poisoning. Even the prison staff thought he was at the hospital. They framed him as an escapee because he didn't make the deadline to get Jesus to sign to "Big State". That was the deal. I don't know if any governor, or congressman, etc., has ever done anything like this just to get a high profile athlete to commit to their alma mater, but you'd better believe they could do it.

reply

I actually think the whole flick was slightly surreal, even down to given the colleges generic names like Big State and Tech U. It was Lee laughing at the system. In addition, I'll venture a point I haven't heard raised: Didn't anyone else get the impression that the warden was just toying with Jake? And Jake went for it out of desperation? I mean, come on: A governor is gonna care enough about some poor black inmate in for manslaughter to cut a deal with him? No way. That's fairy tale land...

reply

sounds like fairy tale but the government is capable of things we would never dream of. people in the gov't are human too and I am sure they are abusive of their authority.

reply

[deleted]

I think the generic names were because no real university wanted to be shown resorting to the bribery that we see.

_______
The sun is shining... but the ice is slippery.

reply

I actually think the whole flick was slightly surreal


Agreed, that whole scene there looked silly. Oh yeah, the governor loves basketball so much that he is gonna free a murderer so he can convince his son to go to the gov's fav' university. Totally.

To me, it seemed as credible as the government using an senile spy in the name of Sean Connery and an awkward chemist in the name of Nic Cage to go free hostages on Alcatraz or them sending testosterone-filled oil rig worker in space to blow up an asteroid. You accept it because it's a movie and because maybe boobies, but you're not fooled.

even down to given the colleges generic names like Big State and Tech U


Oh.... so that's what it was, huh? LOL, i was googling some of the university names while watching this and i didn't understand why i never got any clear answer/hit. Now i know. Yeah, i'm not from the US so all those names are pretty much meaningless, that's why.


People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefsī²

reply

Spike Lee was pointing out how far these colleges and coaches and boosters and agents go to recruit the top high school kids. They've done all this and worse. Probably not releasing a felon from prison, but I'm sure they would if they thought it would work.

reply

This is definitely possible (albeit, in a far-fetched situation and this was only a movie), but Lucky Luciano (for example) got a 50 year sentence commuted by the governor at that time after only 10 years and was released.

... and then he continued to run a mafia organization and committed a slew of additional crimes.

Mark me down for one more, Boardreader!

reply


Laura Bush never even did time, so anything is possible


They'll hang you as sure as 10 dimes will buy a dollar

reply

Murderers and rapists get pardoned and then they go out and commit more crimes. This is why I'm all for the death penalty.

You want to play the game, you'd better know the rules, love.
-Harry Callahan

reply

There should preferably be no death penalty. It's easier said than done and that would work better in low crime, high trust societies like Japan and formerly some countries in Europe. Maintaining such a high civilization state of development should be a top priority for any leadership.

It should only be employed in order to instill fear and serve as a preventative measure. But if it's ever used, which is nothing to be celebrated, it should be reserved only for the worst of the worst, like ringleaders of criminal organizations, genocidal maniacs, or excessive cruelty; there's certainly an ever evolving debate to be had on the matter of when precisely it could be applied. If you start being excessively lenient in a place like Mexico, for example, I doubt that drug cartel leaders would be especially eager to return the favor. They've basically taken over the country and has experience not shown that the situation is a disaster?

And lastly, most people who have committed crimes are not criminals. They're human beings. Those who have suffered discrimination must never be punished excessively. They've already been punished by their hitherto circumstances. There's a lot of injustice and exploitation in the world which officially or unofficially goes around justice. More understanding and consideration is needed before playing God with people's lives.

reply

Japan might be a super safe country, but low crime it is not. Basically half of the country is run by the Yakuza.

reply