Fay Grim


Can anyone recommend the sequel. From what I've read it sounds like a different kind of film with the only similarity being certain characters. Is it any good?


"Don't leave us in the dark!"

reply

Fay Grimm is a great little film... well made, nice production qualities... an entertaining gem with the lovely Paker Posey delighting throughout.

It is one of those fun films that returns more to the viewer/renter than it costs to view it, so it lands squarely into the category of "how did this not get a sustained wide release?"

Posey does a heck of job pulling off thigh-high leather boots and trench coat, too. (see imdb photo)


On a side note --- Fay Grim solidifies my thought that Parker Posey and Mary-Louise Parker would be a good match in a movie together... perhaps as sisters.

reply

Is it a similar film to Henry Fool? Same genre, tone etc?




"Don't leave us in the dark!"

reply

It really isn't the same genre or tone, and I'm sorry to say that Fay Grim kind of ends up souring Henry Fool a little for me.

It's as if Leonardo da Vinci decided to come back to the Mona Lisa and started adding new details. Maybe he gives her some eye make-up and a hat, puts some jewelry around her neck and adds airplanes into the sky. Maybe he adds in a word balloon and has Lisa saying "OMG LOL!!!1!"

Now, he's the artist, and that's his right, but all I can think when I look at the new and improved Mona Lisa is that the original was just so much better.

reply

As I suspected. Hartley's recent films have not impressed me. He seems to have lost his originality and idiosyncracies. Very unfortunate. Thanks for the warning.



"Don't leave us in the dark!"

reply

I can't recommend Fay Grim as a sequel to Henry Fool. I was so excited when it was being released, that first viewing was one of the harshest let downs I've ever experienced...as a standalone film it might be more impressive, but I'm so in love with the characters that I hated to watch them go through everything that takes place in this film, and while at times it was interesting and amusing to see them in the genre of an indie espionage thriller with a slight comedic edge, ultimately it's very sour and doesn't really revolve around the same atmosphere of HF, which was more delicate, intimate, and character driven. In FG they seem hollow and more like puppets acting to further a plot. I think FG would have been easier to take if it was a cast of original characters only loosely connected to the Henry Fool world.

reply

Oh God! I really don't want to watch it now.




"Don't leave us in the dark!"

reply

Some people don't mind it at all. You should still try to watch it for yourself. But that was just my experience :-/

reply

Well, My friend has bought the dvd so I'll probably borrow it eventually but my expectations are pretty low. I really loved Henry Fool so I should give it a try. I hate being disappointed by directors who were once special.



"Don't leave us in the dark!"

reply