WHAT WAS SO BAD???

I gotta agree,I think this film is slated unfairly. The first film was fantastic and any sequel to a good movie has a lot to live up to and clearly this film didnt hit the mark..but it was still good! Beats Devils Rejects hands down.

Quentin Tarantino wrote From Dusk Till Dawn not Rodriguez.

I have only seen it once, but I barely remember.

Danny Trejo is in it. He's in all three of them.

Captain Quint of the Orca, all the reasons that you say this was so bad just have to do with who's in it and who directed it, etcetra. I think it had a good story, good suspense, and good thriller qualities. Why doesn't anyone else agree?

jackssmirkingrevenge13.....those where the dumbest reasons ever to hate a movie....no where in your post did you give a valid reason.....so what rodregaz didn't dirrect t or anything.....it was still good.....the whole campbell thing is stupid yes but it doesnt affect the movie unless thats your main reason to see it (which it was one of mine because I thought he was the star but whatever) And the titty twister being back has been discussed over and over again...it could be in the past.....they could have rebuilt it....could be 2 titty twisters....you never know......so either stop trying to sound smart and think of a valid reason or just shut up.

http://www.petitiononline.com/htdc1993/petition.html

"Rodriguez did not write or direct"? How is that an argument for whether or not the film is good? He didn't write or direct the Lion King either. Maybe he could have done better than Scott Spiegel, maybe not, but now you just sound like a kid who hates Casino Royale for not featuring any gadgets. Whether or not the previous cast was in or not also has no saying in whether or not a sequel is good, although I won't argue with the fact that the cast in FDTD2:TBM sucks (still, I've got a thing for Robert Patrick, but that's beside the point).

Okay one, Danny Trejo was in this movie, so yes, one of the original cast was in it, second the Titty Twister is in here because just like the third one, it's a prequel. I really doubt you watched the movie.

GetITpapi is a dumbass.

The Titty Twister did NOT get destroyed in the first film. Sunlight came in through bullet holes and caused some of the vampires inside to explode but the building was left standing and could have been easily remodeled but it wasn't even close to having been destroyed.

Victory is Mine!!!

Rodriguez did not write or direct

none of the original cast had even the tiniest of cameos

Bruce Campbell was billed, but died quickly

oh yeah! the Titty Twister was back, that thing got destroyed in the first one

But still it deserves atleast a 5+ rating. 3.5 rating. Come on it's not that bad.

"Plus, the elevator scene involing the bats chewing on the lawyers was disturbing. I still get the chills thinking about it"

Isn't that the point of a horror movie?

Oh, yeah, Bruce had too little part, but it was quite funny:-). I dunno why exactly, but I really liked this movie. I didn't expect much and I was positively surprised.

Of course, it's a B-movie as hell, but who cares. It made me laugh, it made me scared, the plot was...well...not that smart, so I think the movie couldn't be better!

And the chapter itself is my GOOOOOOOD Robert Patrick(I luv u, I luv u, I luv u)!!! Ehee...sorry for beeing childish, but I can't help myself:-))). He has sooo many really badbadbad movies, so maybe I was too happy to see him in something wasn't that dummy, that I'm not being objective now. But, well... who cares?

8 out of 10. (7 stars for Robert and Bruce and 1 for...uhmmm...the rest of the movie that I don't remember;-)).

The things that killed this movie:

-A timeline is never made clear.
-Instead of just beating the crap out of the cops they fire guns at them for 5 minutes.
-When Luther bites C.W., Buck comes in and there is no blood on the floor or anything.
-Bitten people turn into vampires way too quickly.
-The Titty Twister is only in the movie once and absolutely nothing happens there.
-Too many bat attacks, and they are very fake and stupid.

Some parts were coolm, though, such as their talk about *beep* films and when Jesus is talking about his friend whose sister was acting in porn. The rest blows.

"Actually, when Peter blows his horn, I shall be playing the tuba."
-Ambrose Bierce

if this film was happening simultaneously than why does the titty twister look completely different to the titty twister in the first film?




-right turn clyde

Most of the tunes in the movie were some of the well known surf-rock guitar classics by Dick Dale. The one you are refering to is "The Wedge".

Go here:
http://www.dickdale.com

[deleted]

I didn't like this movie because it goes nowhere, the setup leaves a lot to be desired, the vampires kills just seem generic, and well the plot all in all just felt lacking. It's not for lack of trying, they really attempted to make this as stylistic as the first but they just failed in my eyes.

I bought the dvd last weekend and now I've watched it about 4 times. I think its great. Its different to the first one and the effects are a bit deliberately cheesy but its still a very enjoyable B movie.
It also the best heist movie I've seen in a long time with some great sleasy B movie characters. Far better than the characters in the Oceans films for example imho.
Get it on Dvd and watch it with an open mind, if you like exploitation horror b movies you'll probably like it.
Go Jaws Go!!!! Goood Boyyyyy!!!!