MovieChat Forums > Resident Evil (2002) Discussion > Please help me understand this movie...

Please help me understand this movie...


I love the Resident Evil games. I own every game of the main series, and still play them on a regular basis. I also enjoy the occasional zombie movie, so I decided to by the RE movie trilogy on DVD. I enjoyed all three movies, especially Extinction, but to me the first one doesn't make any sense. Maybe I'm missing something, but this has been bothering me ever since I watched the movie.

So the Red Queen was designed to contain viral outbreaks. Basically, it worked perfectly. It may have been cruel, but it did completely contain the virus within the hive. Umbrella programmed her to do this. So why the hell does the same Umbrella then send in their secret service, breaking quarantine and releasing the virus?

Second question, why didn't the Red Queen just send a report to Umbrella's higher-ups about the events? It could've said that the virus got released, and she killed everyone in order to contain the virus. Then all of this could've been easily prevented. Did Umbrella really not know what happened inside the hive? I still have no idea what that team was doing there exactly. The only thing they seemed to know was that Red Queen went homicidal. They went in, and went straight to her chamber to shut her down. What exactly was their intention? Why did they shut her down, as it seems even an idiot would know that was going to be a bad idea.

Another question, why didn't the Red Queen just gas the team as soon as they came in, like she did with the employers moments earlier? Why did she even give them the chance to shut her down? And why was Alice hit by a different nerve gas, one that for some reason erased her memory, instead of killing her? I mean, what's the point of erasing the memory of the head of security? How is that gonna help?

Why create a super expensive, state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, pretty much designed to contain outbreaks, if you're just gonna shut her down after it does exactly what it was supposed to do?

I know, many questions, but I'd really like at least some sort of explanation for it. Thanks in advance!

reply

[deleted]

Easiest answer?
It was made by and written by a team of no talent ass clowns who couldn't care less about intregrity to the source material.
And plot holes are the least of their worries when they are pumping out generic garbage.

reply

hahahahahaha!!!! 110% true

reply

Lots of butt hurt game nerds in this thread. Only using their brains until they reach the conclusion that THEY want. and that conclusion is always "THIS MOVIE SUCKS!! PAUL ANDERSON IS A HACK!!"

1. The Red Queen was NOT programed to kill people. She saw the outbreak begin and made a personal choice to kill everyone and seal off the Hive. She didn't contact Umbrella because that raises the possibility of the virus getting out, as she said "I don't deal in chance."

2. She didn't kill anyone with poison gas, it was just Halon, a gas meant to extinguish fires.

3. Umbrella knew the Red Queen wasn't programed to kill people, so they assumed someone infiltrated the hive and changed her programing. "outside interference is a possibility." They were half right.

4. The team sent to shut her down knew they were developing viral weapons, but the T-virus was still in the "Research and Development" stage as the Red Queen stated. Nobody knew about the zombies until now.

5. The shutting doors at the end were a fail safe, but still, why would a corporation NOT want to salvage what they can from the Hive? Save a few employees, recover some data, find out if an enemy has infiltrated their lab, maybe? you know, like Matt, the environmentalist out to expose their entire operation? or do you people really need your hands held on every little detail?

reply

Good post.

"I am like Cryptonite to men. Cryptonite dipped in cellulite!"

reply

[deleted]

1. So you are telling us you didn't watch the beginning of the movie?Okay.

2. There were no fires, and yes she did kill people with gas.You would know this if you watched the beginning.

3. No one reprogramed the red queen. I'm starting to doubt you watchead the movie at all.

4. So company that hires people for Research and development doesn't know what their people research and develop?That's bad writing 101.

5. Why not?The same reason they shut down the hive as a last resort. Up to this point i'm conviced you did watch the movie but your brain was off.Too bad )=

reply

It has been a long time since Ive seen it, but I thought it was all to test out umbrella's bio weapon against the survivors and the SS.

reply

One line that always makes me laugh is when Spence locks them in the room, and Matt says, "HE SHOT THE LOCKING MECHANISM OUT!" The locking mechanism? Uh, what does that even mean? And why would "shooting it out" automatically lock them in? And if shooting it out (presumably making it not work) would lock them in, why would frying the Red Queen's circuits unlock the door?

hehe, I actually love this movie, but when you think about these little details, the logic of so many scenes just crumbles away.

reply

Old post, I know, but: truck /train brakes. When there's air flowing (power), they work. Once the system fails, they lock-up (to prevent accidents). There should have been a LOT more thought /work put into it.. I guess that the good thing is that someone will still be able to film a cool movie, without repeating previous stories (you know, a much better one :))

reply

I just got done rewatching this, so I think I can maybe shed some light on these questions.

|Why did the Umbrella Corp. send their secret squad to break quarantine?

-They don't know WHY they're in quarantine.The mission is to ascertain what happened. They probably didn't think it would be as bad as it was, and so they sent in their team to investigate and maybe even set things straight. Umbrella certainly couldn't go to the government for help, they had to mop this mess up themselves. The probably thought it was a smaller infection, perhaps of something else they were working on, and that the Red Queen over reacted.

|Why didn't the Red Queen send a status/situation report to the Umbrella's Corp. higher up's?

-I don't know exactly why on this, but it WAS 2002. Maybe they couldn't get cable down that far to get the internet out or something. It probably couldn't transmit through satellite since it was underground. Maybe, for safety reasons, Red Queen couldn't access communication lines by herself. I certainly wouldn't want to give her access to the internet.

|Why didn't the Red Queen gas the team as soon as they came in?

-As was said before, they weren't infected. The gas was a way to control the infection, not just to kill people. Also, like it said, "I didn't expect any of you to make it this far." Red Queen figured they'd be zombie chow long before they were a threat, or at least wouldn't make it to the blast doors in time.

|Why was Alice's nerve gas different? And why erase her memory?

-The gas in the Hive was to kill those infected, preventing them from escaping and taking the virus into the world. It was drastic measures. Memory loss isn't always an effect of the nerve gas, but it can be one. It was, as said before, probably to prevent her from prematurely accessing the hive and releasing those trapped.

|Why create a super expensive, state-of-the-art artificial intelligence, pretty much designed to contain outbreaks, if you're just gonna shut her down after it does exactly what it was suppose to do?

-The computer did her job, but they needed to know why. She was keeping all the doors locked, and so they couldn't do any sort of recon until they had unfettered access. They also seemed to be under the assumption that the Red Queen may have malfunctioned. But I assume they never intended for quarantine to be permanent. Like I said above, they couldn't go to any government for help, so they would eventually have to fix the mess themselves. They had far too much invested in the Hive to just seal it away and shrug their shoulders. The business end of Umbrella wanted it back up and running ASAP most likely.

Also, remember that the team is our line of information of why Umbrella is doing things, and the team is obviously not fully briefed on the Hive. Taking laboratories instead of using normal halways to get to the main chamber was kind of a strange route to me, and when they ended up being flooded (more on that later) they went through the "dining hall." It obviously was much more than that, and they had no idea. Clearly Umbrella was hiding many things from them, so the hows and whys of their reasons for entry might never be truly revealed. For all we know, Umbrella sent them in to see just what would happen, for fun.

On the Water flooding the "sealed room," I suspect that was lack of knowledge on the writer or director's part, which is forgivable in some instances, especially back in 2002. However, it could also be that because they were underground, the room would normally connect to the rest of the airflow. In the event of an Outbreak or Fire, personel would shut down the lab and it would seal completely, keeping the air inside, since the occupants would be protected in their suits till they could clean the room. When the outbreak happened, there was no one to inact sealing protocol or something, so the Red Queen had to declare some kind of emergency to get everything shut down and finally seal the rooms (too late, though.)

Anyway, yeah. I know this is late and this is long, but having just seen the movie a few minutes ago, I thought I'd go ahead and answer this as best I could. Hope I helped!

By the way, most of these are just speculations. Its an entertaining movie and I wouldn't get too wrapped up in minute details. It kills the viewing experience.

"The Square Root of Nine is Three!"

reply

The problem here is you are giving the writers credit when they deserve none. It's pretty clearly established that Umbrella in the movies is the equivalent of Monsanto, Microsoft, and Google combined, and they have their own private army - with plenty of nukes to go along with it.

Obviously Umbrella doesn't need the gubmints help and as you can see in the later movies, they killed the entire world and survived.

Also you're buying the god awful story at face value. Umbrella would have known what happened and how and why - that's why there are 16,000 cameras and an AI and a laser hallway, etc. BTW - the government invented the internet. There's no shadow of a doubt that it was easily possible in 2002 or whenever the Hive was built in the story to get high speed ridiculous fiber a half mile underground. It's existed in the real world in comparable areas, underground, for long before this movie was made.

Don't attempt to explain - everything in this movie and the 4 other movies is god awfully written pulp.

reply

Agreed, 99% that such a company with (virtually!?) unlimited resources would've done things (a lot) differently. Clueless writers pretending to know how to write Science Fiction. Only, the network thing: the only (truly) secure network is a self-contained one.. It's a well known fact, since the beginning of time. :)

reply

Part of the job for the Red Queen was to contain any contamination that could be harmful to the outside world.

reply

Based on just the information we are given in this movie, it doesn't make very much sense. Umbrella knew that they were developing the T Virus and they knew what it did because Red Queen told us that. Even if for some reason they didn't know it would create the zombies, they had already used it to create the Licker prior to the outbreak of the film. So the idea that they wouldn't know what happened doesn't add up. Even if they had no idea of the nature of the outbreak they still knew that it had the possibility of being related to the Tvirus and put in place plans to quarantine the facility, even if Red Queen wasn't supposed to kill everyone.

The Team talks about how they don't know if the quarantine is genuine and suspect that it might be someone infiltrating the lab. Since the outbreak was caused by sabotage and someone did really infiltrate the lab, Umbrella probably knew that much and that was the one of the main reasons, if not the sole reason, that they team was sent in to investigate what happened.

I haven't seen the other movies but I know that they involve the character of Albert Wesker who in the games is an infiltrator to Umbrella who purposely wants to release the virus upon the world and wipe out humanity. Umbrella also likes to send people to fight against their monsters just to see how effective they are at killing people, which is the plot of the first game. If either or both of those was shown in the films it would make much more sense. That also supports the reason that the team says they only have an hour until the lab is sealed, when it was already sealed and would have stayed that way if they never went in the first place. That makes sense if Umbrella wanted to send them in but never intended on letting them leave and wanted to keep the place sealed afterwards.

reply

Basically all of your questions have the same answer - because these idiots don't know anything about how to write, or Resident Evil. I would point out one thing though - The Red Queen wasn't designed to contain outbreaks. She was the AI that ran the entire Hive. Her job was to run the hive, every day, for eternity until it went offline.

Literally not one single word in the entire script made any sense nor was it proof-read by anyone who understood the RE universe, nor any other "consultant" for that matter. Realistically, Red Queen would have reported the biohazard outbreak to Umbrella HQ immediately. It then would have reported a second time with the results of the quarantine.

This is, of course, aside from the games themselves in which - and the movie attempts to touch on this but failed miserably - the labs are set to self destruct if there is an outbreak, thus neutralizing the virus. No concern about quarantine, necessarily - just eradication.

The premise for why the team went in at all is flimsy, and really non-existent. Not to mention the second movie "I want to know what went on down there." All of that information, like you said, is clearly recorded by the AI and sent to the right people - at least it seems that way to the viewer because it follows that a facility this high-tech can handle some basic 1999 network functions.

reply

Again, I'm posting answers to old @55 threads, heh. Yeah (!), I wish they handled it differently - like, with some intelligence for example. :-/

reply

The Red Queen killed Umbrella employees so Umbrella send a squad with a mission to disable her. They didn't know about leak of T-Virus and what happend. This is a reason why they re-opened The Hive and lead to the events of Apocalypse.

reply

The simplest answer to your question is that the film doesn't make sense, so the best advice is: don't even try to make sense of it, because that way insanity lies. The only way to enjoy it is just to go with the flow and disengage all critical faculties.

Basically, it's as if Paul Anderson (the writer / director) mashed together half-remembered elements of the first, second, and third games, tossed in a bunch of random stuff that he liked from other films (e.g. Cube), stirred the whole melange together, and hoped it would all gel on the strength of visual style alone.

The "Red Queen" A.I., which is so integral to the first film, has no basis in the games. It's seemingly a mash-up of various "evil computer" elements from films of the past, e.g. HAL 9000 from 2001, WOPR from WarGames, Mother from Alien, etc. And, of course, it's always "creepier" when it's an evil little girl, right? So let's make it that! Honestly, I think the decision-making was on that level.

Case in point: would a corporation really give their miraculous A.I. that controls the entire facility the appearance, voice, and personality of a little girl? It's not exactly a persona that commands much in the way of authority or gravitas. No, it's a little girl because evil little girls are a horror-movie standard - it's as simple as that. Real-world logic is not a factor in this script.

Ultimately, the film is an illogical "cut-up" of borrowed bits and pieces from disparate sources - some from the games, many not - and all of them chosen purely for their visual impact, with little or no concern about narrative coherence.

reply