MovieChat Forums > Out of Sight (1998) Discussion > What was So Darned Great About Jay Lo's ...

What was So Darned Great About Jay Lo's Role


Everyone seemed to gush over her role. Come on, she was pulled along by the rest of the cast, the script and the director.

reply

Not really. She's excellent here, playing squarely against her male co-stars with a character who is very much their equal. She plays her role intelligently, with touches of humour and a wry understanding of her motivations. She's more than up to the challenges of a well-written and smart script, and actually raises Clooney's game through being verbally and physically articulate enough to take the upper hand in their exchanges. Of course, it's written that way in places, but a lesser actress would have struggled to find the natural rhythm of the dialogue met with delicate touches and an assertiveness that's key to the role. Everything about her performance works and fits perfectly with what Clooney and the rest of the cast does.

NOW TARZAN MAKE WAR!

reply

I agree completely. Loved JLo in the movie, she was perfect. I'm shocked so many people are dumping on her performance here. I really enjoyed everything about this movie.

reply

I get the feeling she delivered exactly what they wanted.

I suppose if you thought she would steal the show, you might be disappointed, but she would have had a hard time stealing it from Zahn and Cheadle anyway, so...

reply

I saw this last night for the first time (!) and was very impressed with her performance.
The only thing that bugged me was that her clothes and makeup were a little too perfect (but that wouldn't have been her fault).

reply

The only thing that bugged me was that her clothes and makeup were a little too perfect (but that wouldn't have been her fault).

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The only reason this didn't bother me was because she, in the film always carried herself as someone that took care of herself.

She didn't look Kim Kardashian I spend 4 hours on make-up. But she did look like a woman that woke up an hour early to get her make-up together. I'm not hating on that.



I don't let anyone hot-comb out my HAIRitage!

reply

^ This.

At the time she wasn't J Lo, she was a promising up and coming actress coming off a Golden Globe nomination for Selena and a strong femme fatale effort in U-Turn. She had no music career, she wasn't the face of a multi national $330 million fashion and cosmetics brand. She had no Diva reputation. She was a young Latino dancer who'd worked her ass off to get some film roles and had been on a tear for about three years. It's not like she's ever been some wallflower stick figure type.

I saw this movie and knew that both her and Clooney were going to be massive stars. On top of Lopez's performance being an excellent one for all the reasons listed above, it was also given by someone with genuine star quality, a quality we hadn't really seen in her earlier peeformances which were equally well received.

Probably a rant, but i can't stand it when people project later baggage to diminish obviously great work.

reply

[deleted]

Karen’s moral code as a federal marshal is shown brilliantly throughout the entire film, as she processes what she should do for her occupation as a thrill-seeking fed and what she should do for her own sexual needs as a thrill-seeking woman. Throughout the first two acts of the film, it is constantly hinted that she’s a woman with an emotionally masochistic sex drive, as proven by a past relationship with a criminal, as well as her uncontrollable urge to stay in a flirtatious companionship with a married federal agent (played here by Michael Keaton). The performance of Lopez is a tour-de-force of subtlety, where even Karen’s knack for sarcasm and bullheadedness is still matched with a vulnerability. She’s a gorgeous woman trying to work her ass off in a male-dominated workplace (not unlike Clarice Starling in The Silence of the Lambs), but also fails to truly push to the side this strong personal response to suave men that misbehave. This may also be why, at her age, such a beautiful woman as herself has found herself still single and in constant heartache over her short-ended relationships. When confronted by her father (Dennis Farina) concerning her relationship with the married Keaton, she kicks the conversation to the curb, avoiding the pain and keeping her cool as the strong-minded workwoman.

2015 BUZZER FILM FESTIVAL
http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000005/nest/251196500

reply

it must have been the ass



so many movies, so little time

reply

fersure

What are they doing? Why do they come here?
Some kind of instinct, memory, what they used to do.

reply

Considering most of her shots are dialogue-free, Lopez is really very good here. It might be her best performance - but, it doesn't succeed in making that character more realistic. We needed more information about her recklessness to go along with what we're asked to go along with.

But you shouldn't confuse mistakes in the writing for a bad performance.


Et ses mains ourdiraient les entrailles du prêtre
Au défaut d'un cordon pour étrangler les rois

reply

Why do people on here keep ruining fantasy with the intrusion of reality?

reply