MovieChat Forums > From Hell (2001) Discussion > Johnny Depp inspired the hunt for the 'r...

Johnny Depp inspired the hunt for the 'real' Jack the Ripper


A new book to be published this week claims to have pinponted once and for all the true identity of Jack the Ripper – a revelation made in part thanks to a 2001 film starring Johnny Depp.

It is claimed a 23-year-old Polish immigrant called Aaron Kosminski was responsible for terrorising London's East End in 1888, leaving a trail of at least five vicious and bloody murders in his wake.

In the book Naming Jack The Ripper – to be published in Australia this week by Pan Macmillan – the British author Russell Edwards names Kosminski as the Ripper after having evidence found at one of the crime scenes analysed using DNA technology.

Mr Edwards bought at auction the shawl believed to have belonged to one of the victims, Catherine Eddowes, and asked leading crime scene DNA expert Dr Jari Louhelainen to have it analysed. The shawl, it was found, contained DNA from both Ms Eddowes and her killer.

Mr Edwards says Kosminski was on a list of police suspects but there was never enough evidence to bring him to trial.

He says, however, that the DNA samples can now prove that Kosminski was "definitely, categorically and absolutely" the responsible for the East End killing spree.

"I've got the only piece of forensic evidence in the whole history of the case," he told the London Independent newspaper.

"I've spent 14 years working on it, and we have definitively solved the mystery of who Jack the Ripper was.

"Only non-believers that want to perpetuate the myth will doubt. This is it now – we have unmasked him."

It is believed a police officer called Amos Simpson took the shawl from near the body of Eddowes on the night of her death. Simpson gave the shawl to his wife, but she never wore it. It was passed down through the family until it was finally auctioned off.

Mr Edwards says he was already investigating the Jack the Ripper legend when he found out about the auction.

"I knew I wanted to buy the shawl and was prepared to pay a great deal of money for it," he writes in his book. "I hoped somehow to prove that it was genuine. Beyond that, I hadn't considered the possibilities.

"I certainly had no idea that this flimsy, badly stained, and incomplete piece of material would lead to the solution to the most famous murder mystery of all time: the identification of Jack the Ripper."

He says he was nothing more than an "armchair detective" when he started out.

"When my involvement in the 126-year-old case began," he writes. "I was just another armchair detective, interested enough to conduct my own extensive research after watching the Johnny Depp film From Hell in 2001. It piqued my curiosity about the 1888 killings when five – possibly more – prostitutes were butchered in London's East End."

It took Mr Edwards more than three years to analyse the shawl, which in more than 120 years had never been washed.

"Before buying it, I spoke to Alan McCormack, the officer in charge of the Crime Museum, also known as the Black Museum. He told me the police had always believed they knew the identity of the Ripper," he writes in the book, parts of which have been published in the London Daily Mail.

"Chief Inspector Donald Swanson, the officer in charge of the investigation, had named him in his notes: Aaron Kosminski, a Polish Jew who had fled to London with his family, escaping the Russian pogroms, in the early 1880s."

Mr Edwards says police had always believed Kosminski – who worked as an East End barber and later died in a mental asylum – to be "one of the three most credible suspects".

"What is certain is he was seriously mentally ill, probably a paranoid schizophrenic who suffered auditory hallucinations and described as a misogynist prone to 'self-abuse' – a euphemism for masturbation," writes Mr Edwards.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/johnny-depp-inspired-the-hunt-for-the-real -jack-the-ripper-20140908-10dpay.html#ixzz3CfiNWZip

reply

So long as we're agreed it's the Russians fault

reply

[deleted]

I call bullshìt.

reply

It is bull. The DNA on this shawl was matched with the mitochondrial type. This is the same type that Patricia Cornwell used to claim Walter Sickert was the Ripper, which has also been discredited. I'm not a scientist & its far too complicated for me, but it is no where near 100% conclusive.

The shawl can easily be explained away. Catherine Eddowes was arrested for drunkenness earlier that night she was killed. This shawl was not listed among her possessions at that time, nor was it listed in the official police file at the time her body was found.

One story to explain this is PC Amos Simpson found the body first, & took the shawl away before PC Edward Watkins found her. For one thing, Amos Simpson was part of the Metropolitan Police. Mitre Square was not in Met territory. He was also not in the city at the time.

This also makes the Ripper's time to have completed the mutilations & escape without being seen much shorter to the point of ridiculousness, especially if you believe he killed Stride as well. I also find it hard to believe a police officer would discover a horribly mutilated body, just take the shawl & leave immediately without staring in horror & shock & not alerting anyone.

Russell Edwards made a theory that Simpson obtained permission from a senior officer to take the bloody shawl home to his wife as a gift before it could be cataloged in the police file. Now, apart from the fact it is would make such a morbid gift, the police were already heavily criticised in the newspapers for not catching the Ripper. Had this gotten out, journalists would have gone berserk, especially as Sir Charles Warren had ordered the erasure of the graffiti in Goulston Street before it could be photographed. There is no way a senior police officer would just allow a piece of evidence to be taken by a junior officer as a gift for his wife. Its another bogus explanation that can be discredited.

And lets get to Russell Edwards himself. The credibility of him "solving" the case 100% becomes clear once you look at his greedy motivations. He used to operate the "Official" Jack the Ripper store in Whitechapel (it has closed down since). He would sell tacky junk like yoyos & top hats/capes, chocolates etc. Very tasteless & exploitative considering the subject matter. And its funny how he criticised the Jack the Ripper Museum in Whitechapel that opened earlier this year as being exploitative. Guess exploiting the subject for financial gain is only acceptable when he is doing it.

He has refused to let the shawl get further testing by other scientists, & has now decided to sell it for several million pounds. For that money, I'd want the object to be damn sure 100% proven authentic. This shawl is not even close to being that.

Edwards is a bottom feeding leech only after the money & glory. It is funny how one can go into a lot of detail explaining away his theories & DNA rubbish, & all he can respond with is "you just want the myths to continue." This is what he has said about people that don't believe his crap. He is full of it.

Kosminski may well have been the Ripper, but not for the crap Edwards has come up with.

reply

Johnny depp was terrible in this. I love Johnny but not in this role no. Dear god, and what was the point in turning abberline into a druggie???????? Very insulting to the real guy. This version is terrible apart from Ann who is married to Albert. She’s great.

reply