MovieChat Forums > Bravo Two Zero (1999) Discussion > Why not take a Land Rover?

Why not take a Land Rover?



Just cant understand why they didnt take a land rover.............

reply

too noisey maybe - he explains it a bit in the book but it has been over two years since i read it

reply

They weren't sure about the terrain.

"I won't say a single solitary slovo unless I have my lawyer here. I know the law, you bastards"

reply

Read the books relating to the missione, not just one, but as many as possible.
The whole thing is shrouded in secrecy and there are various versions.
It is a catalogue of errors from start to finish, and there is no shortage of questions and fiction.
Of course there should have been transport.

reply

The decision to not use vehicles was made by the unit itself because first of all only-short wheel base landrovers were available which are basically useless for mission that's supposed to be carried out from a fixed observation position, of course if the dick in charge of the operation hadn't cocked up the LZ at the start of the mission it might have went differently

reply

The essence of a mission like that is secrecy. It's going to be a bit difficult maintaining secrecy if you're tearing around the scenery in a Land Rover.

In any case The Toyota Land Cruiser is much more reliable.

reply

Read "Eye of the storm" by Peter Ratcliffe. This is an acount which is not inflated with Rambo bs.

In fact Land Rovers were used. There were several SAS teams inside Iraq which consisted of three or four Land Rovers armed with everything from machine guns to light anti tank and anti air weapons, and a Mercedes Unimog truck as a carrier for more ammo and other stuff. These units drove and operated at night (no, they they didn't leave too many tyre marks as the Iraqi desert consists mainly of stone, not sand) and took cover throughout the day between rocks and within dried-out river beds, covered by camouflage nets. The Scud launcher vehicles the SAS was hunting operated in the same way.

Bravo Two Zero and one or two other teams were sent into areas that were too flat to hide vehicles throughout the day so small teams on foot were deployed.

reply

Interesting. Thanks for the info.

reply


just watching this (SAS:The Real Story): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDcziF3osVg&playnext_from=SL

the nco explains they were offered/told to take a vehicle but mcnabb refused. as he was patrol commander they went with his plan.
______________________
Eric C 4 Prez

reply

McNabb made the right choice. They barely got down in one piece anyway, having to tow a landrover with them would have been difficult.

And as has been mentioned, the area wasn't suitable. It would have been (and was) tough enough to hide themselves let alone a vehicle.

reply

They where Surpose to take motorbikes that was the idea but mac nab turned them down flat it . Your given your op but its up to you to make plans on how best to carry it out , they were offered bikes but mac nab turned them down it was his first op and he wanted to make a good impression to the dismay of most of his team but it all when to *beep* anyway !!

reply

I ment *beep* not beep !!!!!! Oh *beep* it's done it again what the *beep* is going on stop it *beep* *beep* *beep* shut ha ha got ya *beep* oh you bastar.... D bleep that you sneaky *beep* oh *beep* *beep* *beep* *beep* *beep* *beep* *beep* oh come on get me get just one in just a little one *beep* please how about. *beep* no well *beep* not to bad ok *beep* it I give up *beep* you bastard stop it

reply

In the book Andy said they considered taking vehicles but they would have had needed to take two (to accommodate all 8 of the patrol). They were told the terrain would be mainly flat and therefore it would have been nigh impossible to hide two land rovers (or vehicles of any sort) out of sight of the enemy.

reply