Why protect Evie?


They makes such a fuss about protecting Evie from Imhotep instead of the Americans who are needed for Imhotep to regenerate and become all-powerful...

reply


Why protect Evie?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRzsUVXXMyE

reply

"Instead of the Americans who are needed for Imhotep to regenerate and become all-powerful"

reply

OK, Bluto isn't enough...

Evie was knowledgeable about Egyptology, something the Americans weren't. Ultimately, if they were to stand a chance at all against Imhotep, they would need her knowledge of the ancient Egyptians and customs, plus she knew about the Book of the Dead and how to read hieroglyphs.

Plus, Rick worked for Evie after she saved his life. Why not put his efforts into protecting her?

Also, the Americans were adventure seekers and sportsmen who had guns and would seem to be less vulnerable than a librarian to anyone. Would one man with a gun be able to protect three guys with guns??

And you totally missed the point that ultimately, nothing Rick or anyone could have done would have stopped Imhotep from sucking them all dry, including the Americans. Rick was trying to protect Evie but it didn't matter - the only reason Imhotep didn't kill Evie was because he needed her to be alive.


reply

They sacrificed their lives so Evie could take a nap instead of her trying her hardest to make up for her fatal mistake of reading the book...

It never seemed to cross their minds how the Americans could be protected. Instead they were having a laugh, playing with their guns and drinking booze, even though they were the key to Imhotep's regeneration and their friend had just been sucked dry. Even if they felt the need to protect Evie, it was dumb they didn't even barricade themselves with her inside the room.

I love this movie, but it's just silly how they're so obsessed with protecting Evie, when protecting the Americans should have been their priority while she went out to find out how to stop Imhotep. She was actually much safer being away from them anyway.

reply


You are clearly overthinking this. As I said in my previous post, there was nothing that could be done to protect the Americans from Imhotep, and more importantly, the Americans wouldn't be of much use anyway. Guns, booze, and bravado apparently have little effect on mummies with an attitude.

Evie was the key, which is the answer to the question why Rick found it important to protect her (leaving out his growing feelings for her for now).

Without Evie, Rick would have been unable to stop Imhotep. Rick made the right call considering it was Evie whose knowledge of all things Egyptian enabled Rick to defeat Imhotep.



reply

"You are clearly overthinking this."

Are we back on IMDb or something? That excuse was always just as useless as saying "it's just a movie!" I'm just a fan discussing a detail after having seen the movie dozens of times. And it's simply the truth that the gang protecting Evie while she was taking a nap instead of the Americans who were needed for Imhotep's regeneration, was not the smartest or most logical thing to do. First and foremost, he was after them, Evie could've tried to figure things out while they were being protected. I especially don't get why Evie, as the expert, didn't mention it.

reply

I'm just a fan discussing a detail after having seen the movie dozens of times.


Which is the very definition of "overthinking". You could have read the group's collective response and said "yeah, I guess that might explain it".

Look, if we really want to, we can search for and point out a lot of things that should have been done differently, not only in this film, but in virtually every movie ever made.

But let's look at this like it was a window allowing us to view a historical event. Could things have been done differently? Of course. There was no playbook for Rick, Evie, Jonathan, the Americans or their expert Egytologist to follow when it came to dealing with a cursed mummy who was in the process of rejuvenating himself. In fact, Rick used the lessons learned from this encounter in the sequel, and even then the sequel's playbook didn't provide a bullet proof plan.

Getting back to picking on inconsistencies in any film, I always wondered how the rehydrated Imhotep had magical mystical powers over both man and nature after he came out of the box, but had bupkis when they easily captured him and stuffed him in the box. If that would have been your question, I would have agreed.

But you asked about protecting Evie specifically, and I gave you the answer: Evie, mistakes and all, was the key and the best hope for Rick to defeat Imhotep, which is what actually happened! He made the right choice.

Once again, the Americans were of no use and are only in the movie to fill out the story and provide both comical and dramatic interest, which they did. If Rick spent more time trying to protect the Americans, which he couldn't have anyway!, than he did protecting Evie, a whole different set of events would have needed to transpire to stop Imhotep and it would be a different movie.


reply

"Which is the very definition of "overthinking". "

Again, it's an useless excuse, because it suggests people on a movie board shouldn't discuss details in a movie that aren't logical. Just because a detail doesn't stand out at first, doesn't automatically mean it makes sense.

"Look, if we really want to, we can search for and point out a lot of things that should have been done differently, not only in this film, but in virtually every movie ever made"

And the problem with that is? If you're a fan, it's fun to discuss details. Doesn't mean you're trashing the movie.

"You could have read the group's collective response and said "yeah, I guess that might explain it"."

And what's the "collective response"? You guys are not all saying the same thing. I'm fully aware Rick cared more about Evie, but that still doesn't explain why none of them realized it was much more dangerous to leave the Americans unprotected. Giving the Americans priority wouldn't have meant a certain death for Evie.

I know the answer you provided, but just because you disagree with me, doesn't mean I have to agree with you. Especially since I've now realized Evie was in much greater danger staying near the Americans.

" I always wondered how the rehydrated Imhotep had magical mystical powers over both man and nature after he came out of the box, but had bupkis when they easily captured him and stuffed him in the box."

To be fair, I don't think the movie makes clear what exactly these powers are. But if you want to start a thread about this, hey, just go ahead!

The movie wouldn't necessarily have been that different with a simple acknowledgement that the Americans needed protection to avoid Imhotep from regenerating instead of making the protection of Evie the priority.

reply

"Which is the very definition of "overthinking". "

Again, it's an useless excuse, because it suggests people on a movie board shouldn't discuss details in a movie that aren't logical.


No one said you couldn't ask a question or discuss it. But when you get an answer that would explain your question, constantly dismissing an answer that is logical is overthinking.

And to summarize my answer to your original question: Evie was an important knowledge base to defeat Imhotep and the Americans were not. Further, Rick could not have stopped Imhotep from killing the Americans anyway. I mean really, it's hard to argue against that unless you just want to be a "right fighter".

" I always wondered how the rehydrated Imhotep had magical mystical powers over both man and nature after he came out of the box, but had bupkis when they easily captured him and stuffed him in the box."

To be fair, I don't think the movie makes clear what exactly these powers are. But if you want to start a thread about this, hey, just go ahead!


His powers were on display: he could turn himself into sand and blow in the wind, he could wave his hand and throw people against walls, he could command the winds to take down an airplane, he could overpower and suck the fluids out of anyone he wanted. But he had no such powers in the flashback sequences. When the pharaoh's guards grabbed him after he stabbed the pharaoh, he went without struggle and allowed them to cut out his eyes, tongue, other organs and stuff him in a box.

But if I asked: "Hey, why did Imhotep have no supernatural powers when he killed the pharaoh yet was almost a God when he was resurrected?" Someone might have suggested (although not shown) that perhaps his original curse upon his death along with the power of the passage read from the Book of the Dead gave him the unexplained powers in his second life. At that point, I might say: "yeah, I guess that makes sense even if there was no exposition explaining it. Thanks."

reply

"But when you get an answer that would explain your question, constantly dismissing an answer that is logical is overthinking."

Just because I don't think the answers have been satisfying, doesn't mean I automatically dismiss every answer. Don't you think I considered several explanations before posting this?

Sure, Evie's knowledge is important, but my point still stands. She was not in any immediate danger. At that moment their priority should've been to delay Imhotep's regeneration as much as possible, while she figured out how to beat him. Putting her near the Americans was even more reckless.

"But he had no such powers in the flashback sequences."

Well, ofcourse not, he was still an immortal human back then. He had no powers of his own. Ardeth's voice-over in the beginning stated he'd gain "strength of ages, power over the sands, and the glory of invincibility" upon the release from his sarcophagus.

reply


Well, ofcourse not, he was still an immortal human back then. He had no powers of his own. Ardeth's voice-over in the beginning stated he'd gain "strength of ages, power over the sands, and the glory of invincibility" upon the release from his sarcophagus.


But why *him*. Why did none of any of the other mummies, priests, guards etc. gain these same powers?

reply

Because he was the only one condemned to the Hom-Dai curse.

reply

Thanks. That makes sense.

reply

No problem.👍

reply

"And you totally missed the point that ultimately, nothing Rick or anyone could have done would have stopped Imhotep from sucking them all dry, including the Americans. Rick was trying to protect Evie but it didn't matter - the only reason Imhotep didn't kill Evie was because he needed her to be alive."

That is the correct answer.

reply

Nope.

"Instead of the Americans who are needed for Imhotep to regenerate and become all-powerful"

Evie had no clue how to stop him at that point, so protecting the Americans would've given her the time to figure it out.

reply

Don't know what movie you watched. The Americans were nothing but grave robbers who knew nothing of Egyptology, curses, ancient texts, etc. There were only a handful of people who knew anything about this in this film: Evie, the Egyptologist the Americans hired, Beni, and Rick. You were given the correct answer. Evie had knowledge and the Americans had guns. Notice the guns had no effect?

reply

Don't know what post you read. I never even suggested that the Americans knew anything about Egyptology.

Nope, the answers given do not explain why Rick doesn't care whatsoever about protecting the Americans "who are needed for Imhotep to regenerate and become all-powerful". Have a nice day.

reply

" I never even suggested that the Americans knew anything about Egyptology. "

Then what use would they be? Their guns had no effect on the mummy LOL.

reply

I mean, I guess I could just copy-and-paste this again:

"Instead of the Americans who are needed for Imhotep to regenerate and become all-powerful"

reply

you could copy and paste again, but its still wrong. There was nothing Rick could have done to protect the Americans as we saw quite clearly. The mummy wanted the Americans but he also wanted Evie. Even without the Americans the mummy had power. At least Evie had knowledge. As the movie turns out, it was knowledge that helped Rick defeat the mummy. I see reading the rest of the threads you are one of those posters who aren't interested in answers, you just think you found a plot hole and started this thread under the cover of a question.

reply

Evie's knowledge was not able to help protect the Americans, so their priority at that moment should've been to protect them as best as possible to avoid all hell breaking. So I'm definitely right.

I NEVER claimed I found a plot hole, it's simply a detail I don't find logical. Your reply seems typical of someone who's just pissed because their explanation isn't automatically accepted.

I posted it as a question, because it's exactly what I thought when I watched this scene. I'm open to a reasonable explanation, but obviously I already tried to think of one before I posted this and discussing the topic further I only noticed more issues.

I already explained why I don't find the suggested explanations satisfying. You're free to agree with them, but I certainly don't have to.

reply



You're wasting your time (as I did). He's like a dog with a bone he won't let go of despite the answer being so obvious. As you said:

There was nothing Rick could have done to protect the Americans as we saw quite clearly.


Exactly. This is a serious case of the OP overthinking the story. Rick ultimately defeats Imhotep with Evie's help, so what's the problem?. Isn't that whole point and plot of the story?

Since the reason the Americans were killed and Evie was not was because Imhotep wanted the Americans dead and Evie alive, putting more effort to save one over the other would have had no effect on the story.

No matter what Rick did, the Americans were going to die by Imhotep's hand and Evie was going to live because Imhotep wanted to use her to resurrect Anck-Su-Namun.





reply

Absolutely. Rick couldn't have known about the mummy's power. He figured that Evie needed his help more than the gun toting Americans did. And you're right about Rick not being able to save either Evie or the Americans. They would all be dead if the mummy wanted that. The only reason Evie didn't die is b ecause the mummy wanted her alive. I won't repsond to the poster again. He is like a dog with a bone.

reply

"Rick couldn't have known about the mummy's power."

Lol, now that's a lie. They had just come back from the museum where the Medjai guys explained to them exactly what Imhotep's powers and plans were.

"The only reason Evie didn't die is b ecause the mummy wanted her alive."

Did you even watch this film? Imhotep wanted her dead, he just needed to kill the Americans first to do so. And that's exactly why their safety should've gotten priority.

reply

"You're wasting your time (as I did). He's like a dog with a bone he won't let go of despite the answer being so obvious."

And you're so stubborn you fail to understand what I keep saying to you (and the other poster) again and again.

"putting more effort to save one over the other would have had no effect on the story."

See, missing the point again.

"No matter what Rick did, the Americans were going to die by Imhotep's hand and Evie was going to live because Imhotep wanted to use her to resurrect Anck-Su-Namun."

And again.

Once more, Imhotep needs the Americans to fully regenerate and become all-powerful. If Rick wants to save Evie and himself, the most logical thing would be to make their safety a priority. At least it would buy them time to figure out a way to defeat them for good.

(And I'm not a "he", by the way)

reply

"Once more, Imhotep needs the Americans to fully regenerate and become all-powerful. If Rick wants to save Evie and himself, the most logical thing would be to make their safety a priority."

I don't understand why such a simple concept is beyond you. Despite you saying otherwise, nothing Rick could have done would have saved the Americans. Nothing.

Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.

Since this is sticking in your craw, how do you think Rick could have saved the Americans from the mummy's wrath?

You are a stubborn tool. I purposely didn't respond to you the last two times you replied to me, so I would appreciate it if you didn't respond to me in the future. It's hard to win an argument with an intelligent person, it's impossible to win an argument against an idiot.

reply

"I don't understand why such a simple concept is beyond you. Despite you saying otherwise, nothing Rick could have done would have saved the Americans. Nothing."

Good lord, more proof that you still fail to understand ANYTHING I said. First, it's a lie they couldn't be saved. If they had found the Book of Amun-Ra earlier, they could've defeated Imhotep and saved them all. Second, I didn't argue whatsoever that Rick could've saved them. The point is that they needed to stop Imhotep from fully regenerating or at least postpone it until they had found a way to defeat him. If Rick had been as fatalistic as you, he wouldn't even have gone after the Egyptologist, but just left town with Evie or something. But he actually did want to stop Imhotep from fully regenerating, he just didn't make a very logical choice in his effort to do so.

"it's impossible to win an argument against an idiot.

Well yeah, if I have to explain a very simple thing over and over again to said idiot...

If you don't like me responding to you, there's always the ignore button.

reply


LOL, I told you not to argue with him Sue!!! Total waste of time and gray matter.



reply

Lol, that's funny coming from someone who needed me to understand something that was literally said in the movie!

Now just keep talking to your sock puppet.😆

reply

You did and i didin't listen!! He responded twice so I couldn't help myself. I won't make the mistake of responding to this mummy dummy again.

reply

Lol, you still failed to understand anything, huh? 🤣

Just keep talking to your sockpuppet!

reply

O'Connell was falling for Evie and Jonathan was her brother. Their feelings were making their priorities.

reply

Okay, but it wasn't the smartest and most logical thing to do. And why would the Americans agree to it?

reply

Because the Americans think that they're more than a match for any damn mummy with vast supernatural powers, that's why.

Evie at least had the sense to let other people do the fighting.

reply

Evie also had the sense to read from the book, which ultimately got all those people killed!

reply

Everybody in that place were basically guilty of disturbing the horrors of Hamanoptra. In fact, arguably, since Rick had seen first-hand the supernatural on the site, he should be considered pretty (ir)responsible for everything that happened.

Sensibly, actually, is the idea that "we're all in this together" and not pointing fingers.

PaladinNJ is right: Rick and Jonathan had personal reasons to protect Evie; plus, they had reasons for disliking the Americans.

Add to that the fact that the Americans were armed and were physically stronger than Evie, and the assumption would be that they'd be able to fight or run with more success. Yes, it's silly to assume that their .32 calibre revolvers and athletic prowess would help against Imhotep, but it would be difficult to re-wire your brain to think that way (even if pointed out to one, one would still instinctively believe Evie would be more helpless).

As a final point: while Imhotep draining the Americans and gaining power was dangerous, obtaining Evie was a goal he wanted to accomplish. If it came down to Imhotep being able to resurrect Anuk-Sunamon or recovering his power, I think he'd choose the former. This means that protecting Evie gives you a (very limited) amount of leverage over Imhotep and his ghoulies. And, on that note, regarding his threat level, if he kills Evie and resurrects Anuk-Sunamon, there are now *two* supernatural horrors walking the earth, so keeping him from obtaining that goal is tactically advantageous on a couple of levels.

reply

Yes, I'm fully aware that Rick and Jonathan cared a lot more about Evie than the Americans, but that was never my point. While obtaining Evie was a goal Imhotep wanted to accomplish, he wasn't able to do anything with her unless he was fully regenerated. So even if they had utterly despised the Americans, their priority should've been to protect them. Doing so would also have meant protecting Evie.

reply

I know what you mean, and I don't say you're wrong. A dispassionate approach to strategy might have had them prioritizing differently, but Mr. Spock wasn't in charge. In fact, nobody was really "in charge", and there was a small amount of jockeying for leadership between the two groups. Rick sorta slouches into the role a bit, but if anything, Evie was the team leader for their "side", which would (at least subconsciously) get them thinking Evie needed more protecting as well.

That said, while Imhotep wasn't invincible and almighty prior to regeneration, he certainly wasn't helpless, and if he was frustrated by being unable to get to the Americans, he might have acquired Evie. And, again, his acquiring Evie would unleash a second undead terror.

So, summarizing, it's not like I think you're wrong. If priority were given to Evie or the Americans, it probably should have logically gone to the Americans. But I think there were understandable reasons as to why they didn't go that route.

But, if I recall correctly, didn't they basically consolidate their efforts anyway? They mostly stick together. At one point, Americans are defending Evie, so they're kinda prepared either way.

reply

"They mostly stick together. At one point, Americans are defending Evie, so they're kinda prepared either way."

As I said in another post, I think it would've made more sense if they had barricaded themselves with Evie inside her room. Instead, the Americans seemed not at all concerned about themselves (having a laugh, playing with their guns and drinking booze), even though earlier on one of them shared his distress over Imhotep being after them specifically.

reply

I'm sorry; I clearly missed the other post, or forgot that specific point. Sorry for the re-hash.

One more door wouldn't have made much of a difference; they were already as fortified as they could get, I think. I suppose being in the room would have made a very small difference, but not much. Plus, I highly doubt proper, British Evie would agree to allowing all those cowboys in her room.

At any rate, it's still within character for the Americans to do the Wild West equivalent of chivalry and want to barricade the young lass to defend her rather than hide and cower, no matter how sensible. I suspect, in their minds, they were in a defensible position, and they were "ready" for the monster.

reply

"One more door wouldn't have made much of a difference; they were already as fortified as they could get,"

Meh, the door to the hallway wasn't even locked.

The Americans might think themselves cowboys, but I think it was a mistake for Rick to order they give priority to Evie's safety instead of their own, especially since it put Evie in even bigger danger. Considering that the whole gang had been responsible for unleashing a terrible evil upon the world, they should've gotten together to discuss what would be the smartest thing to do.

reply

They'd probably more just want a doorway at all. They think through their guns, so they'd want a bottleneck. They don't need to lock the door? They didn't think of it? These guys clearly didn't have tactical minds. Again, I'm not disputing your logic or strategy, I'm saying that these people didn't have the heads for it. They're treasure hunters. They're gunslingers. They aren't chess players.

And, again, Rick gave orders to protect Evie because he'd (consciously or subconsciously) consider her a "softer" target, plus he was kinda soft on Evie himself. It's not a question of stone cold tactics, but stone cold fox. Logic wasn't the motive.

reply

The thing is that logic should've been the motive as they knew better at that point.

reply

Again: I'm not disputing the logic or the fact that it should have been employed. I'm just saying that character motivation, human action, doesn't always follow pure-reason method, and it didn't do so here.

reply

Sure, but I don't see why character motivation and human action didn't follow a more reasonable method in this case.

reply

Because that's not how people behave. Martha Stewart was the guru goddess of a $400,000,000 empire and went to jail because she was avoiding a loss of $45,000.

Some scripts have characters act in such an irrational way that it has one yelling at the TV, but well-written scripts don't have rational characters (all the time). Django Unchained won Best Screenplay (not that the Oscars are the sole arbiters of artistic merit) and contained the moment, "I couldn't resist". The character made an irrational decision, but one in-step with his character and his arc.

Breaking Bad is one of the best-written shows of all time, but when Walt gives Jesse specific instructions about a plastic bin, Jesse ignores those instructions and there are disastrous (and hilarious) consequences. Jesse's ignorance is part of his character.

In The Mummy, Rick is never portrayed as the smartest guy in the room, and while he's no dummy, he prioritizes Evie because that's what his character would do.

reply

I think those close to Martha were probably not surpised.

Rick is not the the only character in the movie. And if Evie's safety was his main priority, he definitely shouldn't have left her anywhere near the Americans.

reply

Were Martha's actions entirely rational?

reply

What's your point? Because one person acts irrational, I shouldn't be surprised a whole group of other people suddenly acts irrational?

Again, those close to Martha were probably not surpised.

reply

My point is that human behaviour isn't always predicated on the perfectly logical solution. Often times, other factors dictate action. Mr. Spock or an advanced strategic A.I. would come up with a different strategy and plan than Rick O'Connell.

reply

In real life there's usually a pattern. But this is a movie and since everybody is fully aware what Imhotep wants to do and Burns' death shows that the hotel/fort isn't safe at all, it is indeed surprising that all of them are more concerned with protecting Evie than taking extra measures to protect the Americans. Like I said, we just have to agree to disagree to what extent this movie is able to justify that behavior.

reply

I suppose we will have to ultimately just not understand one another on this point. I really do not see what is inconstent with their characters. Rick demonstrates his care for Evie on several occasions, along with other gunslinger-y traits that would indicate he'd follow that course of actions.

reply

It's not like Rick ONLY cares about protecting Evie. He does want to go out and find the Egyptologist because he understands they need to stop Imhotep from regenerating, but he is not concerned about what would be best for the Americans. In fact, he first tells them to go with him. He's a man with a plan, and that's not at all a good plan.

As for the Americans, they're too scared to go out (so not as brave as they made everyone believe), but take no measures to protect themselves. That does not seem logical to me.

reply

I concur. Rick has other priorities, but his concern for Evie is obviously a high/top priority, which is a good character development for him since up until that time he mostly cared about himself.

I don't disagree that his planning skills aren't super-sharp, but they wouldn't be. He's a seat-of-the-pants kind of flyer and doesn't do a lot of tactics and logistics. That, too, is in keeping with his character.

Yes, the Americans are scared, but they are even worse at strategy and long-term thinking than Rick. They don't take measures in the way you're speaking of because they already have defenses planned. Namely: they have guns. That's about as far forward as they think. The one dude practices his quick-draw against the ceramic organ pot and clearly thinks he's hot-stuff with his weapon. That's his idea of "perimeter secured".

They also drink heavily, which is another coping mechanism.

reply

They weren't drunk when Rick left them behind after they were too scared to go outside or decided it was a good idea to go back to the same place their friend was killed. But even if you forgive the Americans for acting stupid, it's not logical for Rick to leave Evie alone with wannabe cowboys without giving them some sort of advice to better protect themselves. Their safety was a concern to all of them, heck, even the fate of the entire world depended on it. And Evie peacefully taking a nap while of this was going on is just mindboggling.

reply

I thought that "fight the monster" was implied and I don't think a lot of strategy talks would have helped the film.

At a certain level, characters who operate in 100% logical ways wind up like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrI6SyXRWSE

reply

I only recall talk about no one going in or out Evie's room.

I didn't say they had to act 100% logically, but on the one hand you have Rick leaving Evie behind to go look for the Egyptologist and on the other hand he doesn't seem to care whatsoever about the safety of the Americans. This seems especially odd coming after 2 scenes that explain Imhotep is after the American party and should be stopped from fully regenerating.

reply

Yeah, he says, "She doesn't come out, and no one goes in, right?" and they reply, "Right". His tone and the affirmation that they would watch the door implies that they will stay and guard Evie.

As far as I'm concerned, he seems to act 100% in-character, and he is trying to cover as many bases as he can with the limitations he has, to the best of his knowledge and ability.

Imhotep is after the Americans, but he's also after Evie, and it's been explained that he also wants to kill her to bring to life another undead monster, so it seems pretty six-of-one/half-a-dozen-of-another to me.

reply

Like I said, Rick seems to understand that saving the Egyptologist to stop Imhotep from regenerating is a priority. So telling the Americans to come with him or to keep an eye on Evie instead of expressing concern for their safety when it's so essential to all of them, doesn't seem to be in line with that. Especially since I don't see that any of them were safer staying at the hotel/fort without any extra precautions.

Anyway, I enjoyed discussing this with you, but it does seem we've become stuck on the issue.

reply

Yup; ships in the night.

Stay groovy.

reply

reply

You nailed it. Evie's sweet and cute, Jonathan cared about his sister and Rick wanted to peruse her library stacks (if you know what I mean...)

On top of that, the Americans and Our Heroes were at loggerheads almost from minute one. They drew guns on each other in the underground of the City of the Dead. No love lost there, and everything to lose with Evie.

reply

Doesn't explain at all why the Americans would agree to it.

reply

I seem to recall them basically joining forces, at which point they all were defending each other.

Most of the Americans were also high-machismo types. You think the Bourbon guy would have a thought process other than, "Me and my six-guns're gunna protect the little lady, and I'd like to see any boogymans get by them!"? The only American who didn't seem to have this mindset was the scholar, and he went full "every man for himself" and ran off alone. That action is less justifiable than anything Rick or Jonathan did.

reply

Because Evie's adorable.

reply

I don't know, I thought the Americans were more my type.

reply

Not everyone is into gay gangbangs with americans ... and surely not the main character ...

reply

And not everyone is a lesbian???

reply

Not even for Rachel Weisz?

reply

Maybe over Omid Djalili, but no, not the Americans.

reply

Omid Djalili is awesome. He was really great on Black Books.

reply

I just re-watched the scene in the film in the city where O'Connell leaves Evie locked in the room.

The reason he locks the inner door isn't defense, it's to prevent Evie from leaving since she wants to go mummy-hunting with Rick.

He orders the Americans to stay and guard her, so he's actually got all the people he needs to defend in one place - with one notable exception. Given that he can't be in more than one place at once, keeping them together is a better idea, isn't it? It's at least a reasonable one. Safety in numbers, etc.

The only person in need of defense who isn't there is the Egyptologist, which is the guy Rick and Jonathan are off to find. He's actually leaving Evie (defended by the Americans) so he can protect one of the guys with the jars and prevent Imhotep from regenerating.

reply

I know, the determination of Rick makes it very easy to go along with it. But Rick making the protection of Evie the priority is the problem here. Keeping them together in a place other than the hotel would've been far more reasonable. Even barricading the room would've been more reasonable. Delaying Imhotep's regeneration would've been the most reasonable thing to do. Risking their lives to protect the woman who brought the guy back to life, that's a little less reasobable.

I think that at this point we have agree to disagree to what extent this movie is able to justify the characters' actions in this regard. Don't get me wrong, I don't consider this a plothole or even a very important issue. But I'm afraid I still don't find it very logical and I think the script could've done a bit betrer. 

reply

He was delaying the regeneration. They knew the Egyptologist was missing so Rick was going to find him so that he could prevent Imhotep's regeneration. So, they were trying to keep together in a place; they had to split up to find the missing person.

Where else but the hotel should they go? I'm genuinely asking, because they didn't have access to a fort, and I'm assuming that they didn't have a lot of contacts in the city where they could stay. They couldn't ask local police or soldiers to help them out because who would believe them. They could have gone to the museum, I suppose, but would that have been safer than the hotel?

I do not dispute the logic. I keep saying that. But the characters have personalities that would act this way, so I would personally consider that very good writing.

reply

They could've gone to another hotel, Evie's living quarters or indeed the museum. Just a place Imhotep or Beni wouldn't immediately be aware of.

"But the characters have personalities that would act this way"

What exactly is in each of their personalities that they all think protecting Evie and having her stay near the Americans is the best way to stop Imhotep from regenerating? The fact that Rick wanted to save the Egyptologist makes it even more strange, since he seems to be fully aware what the issue is.

reply

Rick was falling in love with Evie and Jonathan really cared about his sister. That's what makes them act that way. Rick (and the Americans) have a kind of cowboy chivalry that would make them act this way.

And, again: Rick secured the closest thing they had to a fort (protecting Evie and the other Americans) and then went to get the Egyptologist. So, he's aware of the issue, and is trying to prevent Imhotep from regenerating.

What is he doing that is out of character?

reply

Rick did not seem like a man without a plan. Leaving Evie near some guys Imhotep wanted to kill was a dumb move. The hotel was not secured whatsoever.

One American was already dead because this woman stole their book and read from it. Are they really that eager to risk their lives protecting her? And first the one guy is nervous about the mummy being after him, but after his friend dies he suddenly doesn't seem to care anymore.

Evie has nothing to say on the matter?

reply

Imhotep also wanted to abduct Evie and kill her to resurrect his girlfriend. Should Rick have left her undefended? Would any place be "secured"? At least in a hotel, Imhotep in the lobby would produce a reaction.

Somebody had to get the Egyptologist, and Rick wasn't the type to sit around. Somebody had to stay and guard the room. Rick told them to stay. Who else could he have called on to protect Evie?

Evie did. She continued to object while Rick physically picked her up and locked her in the room.

reply

"Should Rick have left her undefended?"

It should not have been the priority at that moment.
The hotel or fort or wherever they were was certainly not secured, since the first American already got killed there.

Rick cares enough about the Egyptologist's safety to leave Evie alone with the Americans whom he doesn't advise to move to an unknown location, barricade the door or even lock it. No, initially he told them to go with him which was not smart at all. And these guys were too scared to go with Rick, so it boggles my mind they didn't take it upon themselves.

Evie wanted to go mummy hunting, apparently she had no opinion on what should be their next move even though she was the one who insisted that Imhotep must be stopped from regenerating. Not even a sense of guilt that made her advise the Americans to protect themselves as best they could.

reply

Nowhere would be secure, so there's no point in them packing up and moving hotels. We also don't know the big picture (ie, how many hotels there are, what the vacancies are, etc.).

So, Rick's plan was to lock Evie in a room (so she wouldn't go running all over the city into who-knows-what trap), then tell most of their available forces (for lack of a better term) to guard the room. He then goes with one man (well... Jonathan) for backup to find the missing member of the group to prevent Imhotep's survival.

He can't tell them to go to a location at random because he needs to find them later, not to mention the lot of them moving around would attract attention (Benni might be watching the hotel, for instance), and if there's a better alternative, I don't know what it would be.

Evie wanted to go dashing around with Rick, but her strategies, foolish or wise, were ignored and she was put into the room.

Now, that's what did happen. I'm not understanding what the glaringly irrational part was. Rick's setting up a defense? His going out to find the last guy who can be drained by Imhotep?

Maybe I could figure out what I'm missing by phrasing this question differently: if you were Rick, with the same resources and situation, what would you do?

reply

There are safer places than the hotel/fort where the other American just got killed. And certainly not Evie's quarters. At least it would throw Imhotep off for a while. The museum would've been a better place. Why did they even go back in the first place?

It was not very logical to leave her alone with two Americans who were Imhotep's target in a place that was already shown not to be safe. He could just as well have taken her with him so he could protect her himself. The least he could've done is tell the Americans to get some better guns.

reply

Just to clarify, then: your recommended strategy is for the Americans to get better guns and go to the museum while Rick, Jonathan, and Evie look for the Egyptologist?

reply

I wouldn't have gone back to the hotel/fort in the first place.

Maybe Evie could stay at the museum to figure out a way to defeat Imhotep. But if the Americans insisted on staying at the fort, I would've definitely advised them to find a safer place and barricade themselves. That was actually my first thought when I recently rewatched that scene.

reply

Holy shit, the cognitive dissonance in this thread is mind boggling. Why is this such a mind stumper for people?

"instead of the Americans who are needed for Imhotep to regenerate and become all-powerful..."

But she was an expert! LOL

reply